The Catholic Nation under Liberalism. Perspectives on Religious Unity in Liberal Spain, 1808-1868
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18042/hp.34.07Keywords:
Religious freedom, catholic unity, Spanish liberalism in nineteenthcentury, Spanish nation building-process, religious policy, citizenship in SpainAbstract
The article analyzes the historical meanings of the assertion of the catholic unity of the Spanish nation by the 19th Century liberalism. From the starting point of recent assumptions, which renovate the knowledge of the relationships between religion, politics and the nation, the authors consider the wide range of meanings of the illustrated legacy in the 18th Century and the confessional uniformity, enacted by the sovereign nation that the Constitution of 1812 had outlined. Religious denominationalism didn’t prevent any possibility of individual emancipation. On the contrary, early liberalism tended to mutually reinforce both identities, religious and national. At the same time, early liberals were confident that the new social conditions, enacted by liberal governments, should broaden gradually the operational range for the free individuals. Under queen Isabel II liberals kept hope on this way to the progress in confessional matters. However, the situation in the mid-19th Century led progressive liberals to a new expression of their ideas, that weakened their former postulates concerning individual emancipation and the citizens’ ability to choice.Downloads
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2016 Jesús Millán y García-Varela, Maria Cruz Romeo Mateo
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by-nc-nd/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors whose contributions are accepted for publication in this journal, accept the following terms:
a. The authors retain their copyright and guarantee to the magazine the right of first publication of their work, which will be simultaneously subject to the Creative Commons Attribution License Attribution-Noncommercial-No derivative works 4.0 Spain, which allows third parties to share the work as long as its author and its first publication is indicated.
b. Authors may adopt other non-exclusive license agreements to distribute the version of the published work (e.g. deposit in an institutional repository or archive, or published in a monographic volume) provided the initial publication in this journal is indicated.
PLAGIARISM AND SCIENTIFIC FRAUD
The publication of work that infringes on intellectual property rights is the sole responsibility of the authors, including any conflicts that may occur regarding infringement of copyright. This includes, most importantly, conflicts related to the commission of plagiarism and/or scientific fraud.
Plagiarism is understood to include:
1. Presenting the work of others as your own.
2. Adopting words or ideas from other authors without due recognition.
3. Not using quotation marks or another distinctive format to distinguish literal quotations.
4. Giving incorrect information about the true source of a citation.
5. The paraphrasing of a source without mentioning the source.
6. Excessive paraphrasing, even if the source is mentioned.
Practices constituting scientific fraud are as follows:
1. Fabrication, falsification or omission of data and plagiarism.
2. Duplicate publication.
3. Conflicts of authorship.