The watchdog that didn't bark. The spanish bishops and the francoist repression during the spanish Civil War
Keywords:
Spanish Civil War, 1936-1939, catholic Church, spanish bishops, francoist reppresionAbstract
This study examines the stand taken by Spanish bishops towards Francoist repression during the Spanish Civil War. The aim is to establish the extent of the bishops’ collaboration with Francoist repression and the reasons behind their words or silences. Its main sources are ecclesiastical bulletins, and secondarily some collected letters from the Spanish bishops. Thirty of these bulletins were issued in the summer of 1936 and forty-nine in March 1939, just before the end of the war. Twenty three bishops took a stance over the war period on three aspects of their priests’ activities arising from the repression practiced by the insurgents: the provision of good religious conduct certificates to leftists by parish priests, the clergy’s obligation to report on their parishioners to the authorities and their participation in capital cases. The study emphasizes the Spanish bishops’ division into two groups and offers some hypotheses about the silence of half of them. It also shows the connection between the Spanish bishops’ ideological identity with the rebels and a long-lasting anticlericalism that was intensified several months before the war started. Likewise, it exposes for areas a wide variety of differences both for the episcopal statements and the behavior of the clergy.Downloads
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2016 santiago alfonso martínez sánchez
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors whose contributions are accepted for publication in this journal, accept the following terms:
a. The authors retain their copyright and guarantee to the magazine the right of first publication of their work, which will be simultaneously subject to the Creative Commons Attribution License Attribution-Noncommercial-No derivative works 4.0 Spain, which allows third parties to share the work as long as its author and its first publication is indicated.
b. Authors may adopt other non-exclusive license agreements to distribute the version of the published work (e.g. deposit in an institutional repository or archive, or published in a monographic volume) provided the initial publication in this journal is indicated.
PLAGIARISM AND SCIENTIFIC FRAUD
The publication of work that infringes on intellectual property rights is the sole responsibility of the authors, including any conflicts that may occur regarding infringement of copyright. This includes, most importantly, conflicts related to the commission of plagiarism and/or scientific fraud.
Plagiarism is understood to include:
1. Presenting the work of others as your own.
2. Adopting words or ideas from other authors without due recognition.
3. Not using quotation marks or another distinctive format to distinguish literal quotations.
4. Giving incorrect information about the true source of a citation.
5. The paraphrasing of a source without mentioning the source.
6. Excessive paraphrasing, even if the source is mentioned.
Practices constituting scientific fraud are as follows:
1. Fabrication, falsification or omission of data and plagiarism.
2. Duplicate publication.
3. Conflicts of authorship.