The «Escuela de Estudios Hispanoamericanos»: origins and content of a cultural Enterprise
Keywords:
Catholicism, traditionalism, panhispanism, cultureAbstract
After the interruption of the Civil War, the creation of the «Escuela de Estudios Hispanoamericanos» in 1942 enabled scholars to take up American studies once again in Seville. The cultural project they were engaged in had political implications for its authors –among whom Vicente Rodríguez Casado was particularly noteworthy– due to an intellectual formation immersed in the conservative panhispanic ideal born at the turn of the twentieth century. In spite of the academic tone of the School, connected to CSIC, its cultural vision was to have a marked impact because of its close association with the restorationist interpretation of history espoused by supporters of Catholic traditionalism. The similiarities and differences with other cultural projects at the heart of Francoism was a constant preoccupation of the EEH, to the point of producing serious confrontations to lead the cultural policy in Latin America.Downloads
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2016 Antonio Cañellas Mas
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by-nc-nd/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors whose contributions are accepted for publication in this journal, accept the following terms:
a. The authors retain their copyright and guarantee to the magazine the right of first publication of their work, which will be simultaneously subject to the Creative Commons Attribution License Attribution-Noncommercial-No derivative works 4.0 Spain, which allows third parties to share the work as long as its author and its first publication is indicated.
b. Authors may adopt other non-exclusive license agreements to distribute the version of the published work (e.g. deposit in an institutional repository or archive, or published in a monographic volume) provided the initial publication in this journal is indicated.
PLAGIARISM AND SCIENTIFIC FRAUD
The publication of work that infringes on intellectual property rights is the sole responsibility of the authors, including any conflicts that may occur regarding infringement of copyright. This includes, most importantly, conflicts related to the commission of plagiarism and/or scientific fraud.
Plagiarism is understood to include:
1. Presenting the work of others as your own.
2. Adopting words or ideas from other authors without due recognition.
3. Not using quotation marks or another distinctive format to distinguish literal quotations.
4. Giving incorrect information about the true source of a citation.
5. The paraphrasing of a source without mentioning the source.
6. Excessive paraphrasing, even if the source is mentioned.
Practices constituting scientific fraud are as follows:
1. Fabrication, falsification or omission of data and plagiarism.
2. Duplicate publication.
3. Conflicts of authorship.