Violence vs. representation. Members of the Parliament of 1936, victims of the Spanish civil war
Keywords:
Spanish civil war, repression, violence, representativesAbstract
The paper analyzes the situation of Spanish deputies elected in 1936 after the outbreak of the civil war. Nearly a fifth of them died as a result of the violence that broke out on both sides and the repression that followed after the war ended. The article pays attention to the chronology of the violence that responds to the same patterns that have been observed for the whole of Spanish society. Almost 80% of them were killed in the first forty days of the war. As for the places where the violence occurred must make a distinction as to the reasons that prevailed on both sides. Among the rebels seem to have dominated the idea of using violence as a means of terrorizing and paralyzing the possible resistance of the government related organizations. This was especially visible in Andalusia and, to a lesser extent, in Galicia. In the area loyal to the Government the scene of more violence was Madrid, residence of many representatives. Also draws attention to the high level of violence in Ciudad Real and Toledo, where ideological differences could be accompanied by local political tensions. The article, on the other hand, tries to give a brief personal information of people who suffered such violence.Downloads
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2016 Octavio Ruiz-Manjón
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by-nc-nd/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors whose contributions are accepted for publication in this journal, accept the following terms:
a. The authors retain their copyright and guarantee to the magazine the right of first publication of their work, which will be simultaneously subject to the Creative Commons Attribution License Attribution-Noncommercial-No derivative works 4.0 Spain, which allows third parties to share the work as long as its author and its first publication is indicated.
b. Authors may adopt other non-exclusive license agreements to distribute the version of the published work (e.g. deposit in an institutional repository or archive, or published in a monographic volume) provided the initial publication in this journal is indicated.
PLAGIARISM AND SCIENTIFIC FRAUD
The publication of work that infringes on intellectual property rights is the sole responsibility of the authors, including any conflicts that may occur regarding infringement of copyright. This includes, most importantly, conflicts related to the commission of plagiarism and/or scientific fraud.
Plagiarism is understood to include:
1. Presenting the work of others as your own.
2. Adopting words or ideas from other authors without due recognition.
3. Not using quotation marks or another distinctive format to distinguish literal quotations.
4. Giving incorrect information about the true source of a citation.
5. The paraphrasing of a source without mentioning the source.
6. Excessive paraphrasing, even if the source is mentioned.
Practices constituting scientific fraud are as follows:
1. Fabrication, falsification or omission of data and plagiarism.
2. Duplicate publication.
3. Conflicts of authorship.