«For the amusement of Godoy and the Queen …»: On the virtue of Queen Marie Louise and the legitimacy of Charles IV of Spain
Keywords:
Marie Louise of Parme, Charles IV, Manuel Godoy, Ferdinand VII, French Revolution, Ferdinand’s party, the image of the monarchy, public opinion, opposition, XVIII-XIX centuriesAbstract
This essay studies four aspects of the tarnished reputation of Marie Louise of Parme, Queen of Spain. Firstly, it identifies the causes of the deterioration of her public image, namely long-term historical processes, the particular political circumstances of Charles IV’s reign, and the personal way in which Marie Louise performed her role as consort. Secondly, it analyses the misogynist tone of the attacks levelled against her, taking into account the evident French influences but also highlighting the Spanish historical precedents (previous Queen-consorts of Spain had often been lampooned by the enemies of the King). Thirdly, this article uses a wide variety of unpublished or little-known sources in order to gain an overview of the criticisms of Marie Louise during her husband’s reign. Finally, it considers the effects of these rumours and satires on the legitimacy of both the King and the Absolutist System.Downloads
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2016 Antonio Juan Calvo Maturana
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors whose contributions are accepted for publication in this journal, accept the following terms:
a. The authors retain their copyright and guarantee to the magazine the right of first publication of their work, which will be simultaneously subject to the Creative Commons Attribution License Attribution-Noncommercial-No derivative works 4.0 Spain, which allows third parties to share the work as long as its author and its first publication is indicated.
b. Authors may adopt other non-exclusive license agreements to distribute the version of the published work (e.g. deposit in an institutional repository or archive, or published in a monographic volume) provided the initial publication in this journal is indicated.
PLAGIARISM AND SCIENTIFIC FRAUD
The publication of work that infringes on intellectual property rights is the sole responsibility of the authors, including any conflicts that may occur regarding infringement of copyright. This includes, most importantly, conflicts related to the commission of plagiarism and/or scientific fraud.
Plagiarism is understood to include:
1. Presenting the work of others as your own.
2. Adopting words or ideas from other authors without due recognition.
3. Not using quotation marks or another distinctive format to distinguish literal quotations.
4. Giving incorrect information about the true source of a citation.
5. The paraphrasing of a source without mentioning the source.
6. Excessive paraphrasing, even if the source is mentioned.
Practices constituting scientific fraud are as follows:
1. Fabrication, falsification or omission of data and plagiarism.
2. Duplicate publication.
3. Conflicts of authorship.