How to control German power? Mendès France, Mitterrand and European integration
Keywords:
German unification, German rearmament, EDC, FranceAbstract
Since the end of World War II, there were two moments when France had to face a dramatic increase of German power: the first one corresponded to Pierre Mendès France’s tenure as Prime Minister, who had to deal with German rearmament; the second moment was coincident with François Mitterrand’s presidency, when the question of German unification was again on the table. Traditionally, it has been asserted that French attitude concerning these problems had been merely reactive and incapable of exerting any significant influence on the course of events. However, during the last years a new literature has emerged which emphasizes the importance of French contribution to the evolution of institutional continental architecture. In this article, there has been implemented a comparative study on the reaction of both French leaders and their influence on European integration. Its conclusions are closer to the latter view, because Mendès France was decisive to enhance the Anglosaxon compromise in the defence of the continent, with a division of labour between the European Communities and NATO. For his part, Mitterrand’s action helped to anchor united Germany in Europe more closely, even though his ability to influence the events was narrower. Finally, France evidenced in both moments its reluctance towards federalism, and preferred intermediate solutions. These solutions provided Paris with a certain autonomy of action, a result that was coherent with its objective of preserving its world power status.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2016 Javier Lion Bustillo
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors whose contributions are accepted for publication in this journal, accept the following terms:
a. The authors retain their copyright and guarantee to the magazine the right of first publication of their work, which will be simultaneously subject to the Creative Commons Attribution License Attribution-Noncommercial-No derivative works 4.0 Spain, which allows third parties to share the work as long as its author and its first publication is indicated.
b. Authors may adopt other non-exclusive license agreements to distribute the version of the published work (e.g. deposit in an institutional repository or archive, or published in a monographic volume) provided the initial publication in this journal is indicated.
PLAGIARISM AND SCIENTIFIC FRAUD
The publication of work that infringes on intellectual property rights is the sole responsibility of the authors, including any conflicts that may occur regarding infringement of copyright. This includes, most importantly, conflicts related to the commission of plagiarism and/or scientific fraud.
Plagiarism is understood to include:
1. Presenting the work of others as your own.
2. Adopting words or ideas from other authors without due recognition.
3. Not using quotation marks or another distinctive format to distinguish literal quotations.
4. Giving incorrect information about the true source of a citation.
5. The paraphrasing of a source without mentioning the source.
6. Excessive paraphrasing, even if the source is mentioned.
Practices constituting scientific fraud are as follows:
1. Fabrication, falsification or omission of data and plagiarism.
2. Duplicate publication.
3. Conflicts of authorship.