The Cuadernos de la Gaya Ciencia and the nietzschean leftism in Spain of the transition
Keywords:
Contemporary spanish philosophy, nietzscheanism, sociology of philosophy, reviewsAbstract
In this paper we present a research about the journal Los Cuadernos de la Gaya Ciencia, published in Spain between 1975 and 1976. Our approach uses a sociophilosophical methodology (Pierre Bourdieu, Randall Collins) in order to explore the historical context where this journal was born. Secondly, we place Los Cuadernos in the field of the Spanish philosophical journals in order to understand his singularity. At the same time, we make some remarks about the social origin of the journal’s contributors. Finally we focus in the contents, taking account of the main arguments, philosophical figures and intellectual trends invoked in the journal’s articles. In this way, we point specifically to the political subtext suggested by the journal essaysDownloads
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2016 Francisco José Vázquez García
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors whose contributions are accepted for publication in this journal, accept the following terms:
a. The authors retain their copyright and guarantee to the magazine the right of first publication of their work, which will be simultaneously subject to the Creative Commons Attribution License Attribution-Noncommercial-No derivative works 4.0 Spain, which allows third parties to share the work as long as its author and its first publication is indicated.
b. Authors may adopt other non-exclusive license agreements to distribute the version of the published work (e.g. deposit in an institutional repository or archive, or published in a monographic volume) provided the initial publication in this journal is indicated.
PLAGIARISM AND SCIENTIFIC FRAUD
The publication of work that infringes on intellectual property rights is the sole responsibility of the authors, including any conflicts that may occur regarding infringement of copyright. This includes, most importantly, conflicts related to the commission of plagiarism and/or scientific fraud.
Plagiarism is understood to include:
1. Presenting the work of others as your own.
2. Adopting words or ideas from other authors without due recognition.
3. Not using quotation marks or another distinctive format to distinguish literal quotations.
4. Giving incorrect information about the true source of a citation.
5. The paraphrasing of a source without mentioning the source.
6. Excessive paraphrasing, even if the source is mentioned.
Practices constituting scientific fraud are as follows:
1. Fabrication, falsification or omission of data and plagiarism.
2. Duplicate publication.
3. Conflicts of authorship.
