Postwar crossroads and Eugenio D'Ors' first stay in Argentina
Keywords:
Argentina, España, Intelectuales, Eugenio d'OrsAbstract
Attempting to make a contribution to a hardly explored field of study, this paper considers two closely related issues. On the one hand, the study of the influence of Eugenio d’Ors among Argentine intellectuals in the early decades of the twentieth century. In the context of the first years of postwar Europe, the Russian Revolution and the university reformist process in Argentina, it analyzes the experience of Colegio Novecentista, the productions of its members and networks of sociability established between them as part of the reformism and anti-positivist movement. On the other hand, it studies the visit of Eugenio d’Ors to Argentina and Uruguay that took place during the second half of 1921. Within this framework, it tries to examine how Argentine intellectuals fields were articulated in relation to the proposals of the Catalan thinker during his classes, lectures and public conferences. In the intertwining of the two subjects this text intends to articulate a comparative approach to some responses held to face the «crisis of conscience» after the Great War in Argentina and Spain, characterized by the conjunction of the criticisms of liberalism and positivism, vitalism and youthism.Downloads
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2016 Maximiliano Fuentes Codera
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors whose contributions are accepted for publication in this journal, accept the following terms:
a. The authors retain their copyright and guarantee to the magazine the right of first publication of their work, which will be simultaneously subject to the Creative Commons Attribution License Attribution-Noncommercial-No derivative works 4.0 Spain, which allows third parties to share the work as long as its author and its first publication is indicated.
b. Authors may adopt other non-exclusive license agreements to distribute the version of the published work (e.g. deposit in an institutional repository or archive, or published in a monographic volume) provided the initial publication in this journal is indicated.
PLAGIARISM AND SCIENTIFIC FRAUD
The publication of work that infringes on intellectual property rights is the sole responsibility of the authors, including any conflicts that may occur regarding infringement of copyright. This includes, most importantly, conflicts related to the commission of plagiarism and/or scientific fraud.
Plagiarism is understood to include:
1. Presenting the work of others as your own.
2. Adopting words or ideas from other authors without due recognition.
3. Not using quotation marks or another distinctive format to distinguish literal quotations.
4. Giving incorrect information about the true source of a citation.
5. The paraphrasing of a source without mentioning the source.
6. Excessive paraphrasing, even if the source is mentioned.
Practices constituting scientific fraud are as follows:
1. Fabrication, falsification or omission of data and plagiarism.
2. Duplicate publication.
3. Conflicts of authorship.