Socialist theatre in Portugal. From the founding of the Socialist Party of Portugal to the Estado Novo (1875-1933)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18042/hp.2024.AL.12Abstract
This article analyzes the theater written to be performed —without considering, therefore, the dramatic texts, which are literary exercises— by the socialist workers of Portugal between 1875, date of the founding of the Socialist Party, and 1933, when the Estado Novo was institutionalized. Our work is based on the consul[1]tation of newspaper sources, on the theatrical works that were printed and on critical bibliography on the subject, and its objective is to inscribe this dramaturgy in the history of Portuguese socialism describing its impact as a response to the challenges of industrial capitalism.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Beatriz Peralta García
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors whose contributions are accepted for publication in this journal, accept the following terms:
a. The authors retain their copyright and guarantee to the magazine the right of first publication of their work, which will be simultaneously subject to the Creative Commons Attribution License Attribution-Noncommercial-No derivative works 4.0 Spain, which allows third parties to share the work as long as its author and its first publication is indicated.
b. Authors may adopt other non-exclusive license agreements to distribute the version of the published work (e.g. deposit in an institutional repository or archive, or published in a monographic volume) provided the initial publication in this journal is indicated.
PLAGIARISM AND SCIENTIFIC FRAUD
The publication of work that infringes on intellectual property rights is the sole responsibility of the authors, including any conflicts that may occur regarding infringement of copyright. This includes, most importantly, conflicts related to the commission of plagiarism and/or scientific fraud.
Plagiarism is understood to include:
1. Presenting the work of others as your own.
2. Adopting words or ideas from other authors without due recognition.
3. Not using quotation marks or another distinctive format to distinguish literal quotations.
4. Giving incorrect information about the true source of a citation.
5. The paraphrasing of a source without mentioning the source.
6. Excessive paraphrasing, even if the source is mentioned.
Practices constituting scientific fraud are as follows:
1. Fabrication, falsification or omission of data and plagiarism.
2. Duplicate publication.
3. Conflicts of authorship.
