On «men without substance»
Masculinity in the discourse of the ecclesiastical counterrevolution at the beginning of the nineteenth century
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18042/hp.2024.AL.11Abstract
This article analyses the construction of masculinity within the ecclesiastical counterrevolution in the context of the early nineteenth century. The new time opened after 1808 witnessed numerous discursive disputes around the definition of masculinity and the gender order. My aim is to show that the new ideals of liberal masculinity, as well as their vision of the relationship between men and women, were vigorously contested by the reformulations that the reactionary clergy made of the religious masculinity of the Old Regime. From the perspective provided by gender history, I approach this analysis assuming the methodological position according to which the meanings of virility emerge from the conflictive coexistence between disputed gender visions. From the study of the writings of paradigmatic ecclesiastics of the counterrevolution, such as Francisco Alvarado or Rafael Vélez, as well as the press of the period, I will defend that the reactionary clergy identified liberal men and their way of understanding gender relations as immorality and as the causes of the gender disorder in which they observed the nation. To counteract this situation, they tried to underpin the religious content of masculine virtue by reinforcing values of the Catholic tradition such as the containment of passions, the separation between the sexes or the superiority of celibacy over marriage.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Bakarne Altonaga Begoña
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors whose contributions are accepted for publication in this journal, accept the following terms:
a. The authors retain their copyright and guarantee to the magazine the right of first publication of their work, which will be simultaneously subject to the Creative Commons Attribution License Attribution-Noncommercial-No derivative works 4.0 Spain, which allows third parties to share the work as long as its author and its first publication is indicated.
b. Authors may adopt other non-exclusive license agreements to distribute the version of the published work (e.g. deposit in an institutional repository or archive, or published in a monographic volume) provided the initial publication in this journal is indicated.
PLAGIARISM AND SCIENTIFIC FRAUD
The publication of work that infringes on intellectual property rights is the sole responsibility of the authors, including any conflicts that may occur regarding infringement of copyright. This includes, most importantly, conflicts related to the commission of plagiarism and/or scientific fraud.
Plagiarism is understood to include:
1. Presenting the work of others as your own.
2. Adopting words or ideas from other authors without due recognition.
3. Not using quotation marks or another distinctive format to distinguish literal quotations.
4. Giving incorrect information about the true source of a citation.
5. The paraphrasing of a source without mentioning the source.
6. Excessive paraphrasing, even if the source is mentioned.
Practices constituting scientific fraud are as follows:
1. Fabrication, falsification or omission of data and plagiarism.
2. Duplicate publication.
3. Conflicts of authorship.