A pacted transition? The five pacts of the Portuguese double transition (1974-1982)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18042/hp.2024.AL.09Abstract
The Portuguese transition has been reviewed by several political scientists and a part of the literature devoted to transitions to democracy since the 1970s. However, it remains difficult to understand and explain its success. This is what the present article purports to do, retrieving some of these contributions and linking them to a historio[1]graphical approach anchored in recent studies on Portuguese political history. In this sense, it reclaims the idea of a double transition taking place in Portugal between 1974 and 1982 and draws attention not only to the two pacts signed in 1975 and 1976, but also to three other pacts which we believe were decisive to the success of the Portuguese transition.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 David Castaño
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors whose contributions are accepted for publication in this journal, accept the following terms:
a. The authors retain their copyright and guarantee to the magazine the right of first publication of their work, which will be simultaneously subject to the Creative Commons Attribution License Attribution-Noncommercial-No derivative works 4.0 Spain, which allows third parties to share the work as long as its author and its first publication is indicated.
b. Authors may adopt other non-exclusive license agreements to distribute the version of the published work (e.g. deposit in an institutional repository or archive, or published in a monographic volume) provided the initial publication in this journal is indicated.
PLAGIARISM AND SCIENTIFIC FRAUD
The publication of work that infringes on intellectual property rights is the sole responsibility of the authors, including any conflicts that may occur regarding infringement of copyright. This includes, most importantly, conflicts related to the commission of plagiarism and/or scientific fraud.
Plagiarism is understood to include:
1. Presenting the work of others as your own.
2. Adopting words or ideas from other authors without due recognition.
3. Not using quotation marks or another distinctive format to distinguish literal quotations.
4. Giving incorrect information about the true source of a citation.
5. The paraphrasing of a source without mentioning the source.
6. Excessive paraphrasing, even if the source is mentioned.
Practices constituting scientific fraud are as follows:
1. Fabrication, falsification or omission of data and plagiarism.
2. Duplicate publication.
3. Conflicts of authorship.
