For the right to live, the path of violence
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18042/hp.2024.AL.02Abstract
The article demonstrates the call to violent action of the anarchists of the Mexican Liberal Party. Positioned as reformists, who influenced the 1917 Constitution, the anarchists were transformed and placed at the service of the State. In this writing, based on its publication Regeneración, the reasons why only with the violent disappearance of the bourgeoisie, authorities and clergy, freedom would be achieved and anarchy would be established in the world are addressed. Love would prevail, without the enemy defenders of private property. The three monsters of humanity had to be eliminated, the war was to the death, without negotiations or half measures. However, this stance, which was maintained for a decade, was successfully transformed by Enrique Flores Magón, in later years, carried out memory building actions that minimized the objective expressed in Regeneración and achieved the inclusion in the revolutionary teleology as the social precursors of the Mexican revolution, leaving aside the issue of violence as a call to the world proletariat.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Marco Antonio Samaniego López
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors whose contributions are accepted for publication in this journal, accept the following terms:
a. The authors retain their copyright and guarantee to the magazine the right of first publication of their work, which will be simultaneously subject to the Creative Commons Attribution License Attribution-Noncommercial-No derivative works 4.0 Spain, which allows third parties to share the work as long as its author and its first publication is indicated.
b. Authors may adopt other non-exclusive license agreements to distribute the version of the published work (e.g. deposit in an institutional repository or archive, or published in a monographic volume) provided the initial publication in this journal is indicated.
PLAGIARISM AND SCIENTIFIC FRAUD
The publication of work that infringes on intellectual property rights is the sole responsibility of the authors, including any conflicts that may occur regarding infringement of copyright. This includes, most importantly, conflicts related to the commission of plagiarism and/or scientific fraud.
Plagiarism is understood to include:
1. Presenting the work of others as your own.
2. Adopting words or ideas from other authors without due recognition.
3. Not using quotation marks or another distinctive format to distinguish literal quotations.
4. Giving incorrect information about the true source of a citation.
5. The paraphrasing of a source without mentioning the source.
6. Excessive paraphrasing, even if the source is mentioned.
Practices constituting scientific fraud are as follows:
1. Fabrication, falsification or omission of data and plagiarism.
2. Duplicate publication.
3. Conflicts of authorship.