Women, feminism and intergenerational relationships in the Canary Islands’ anti-NATO movement
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18042/hp.52.04Abstract
The mobilisation against Spain’s membership in NATO during the first half of the 1980s involved different parties, organisations and individuals committed to pacifism and antimilitarism. This paper, which considers the case of the Canary
Islands, where there was broad support for the No vote in the 1986 referendum, proposes a new approach to the history of pacifism in Spain by focusing on women
and relationships between generations. Based on archival sources and oral testimonies, it analyses tensions between different ways of understanding commitment,
international politics and the role of women and feminism in the pacifist movement, as well as the inheritance and exchanges, common references and mutual learning over three generations of women. Special attention is also paid to their relationships with men of different generations within the anti-NATO movement, as well as to
family networks and genealogies which promoted intergenerational exchanges. Our study sheds light on generational renewal in feminism and pacifism.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Mónica Moreno Seco, Eva Espinar Ruiz
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors whose contributions are accepted for publication in this journal, accept the following terms:
a. The authors retain their copyright and guarantee to the magazine the right of first publication of their work, which will be simultaneously subject to the Creative Commons Attribution License Attribution-Noncommercial-No derivative works 4.0 Spain, which allows third parties to share the work as long as its author and its first publication is indicated.
b. Authors may adopt other non-exclusive license agreements to distribute the version of the published work (e.g. deposit in an institutional repository or archive, or published in a monographic volume) provided the initial publication in this journal is indicated.
PLAGIARISM AND SCIENTIFIC FRAUD
The publication of work that infringes on intellectual property rights is the sole responsibility of the authors, including any conflicts that may occur regarding infringement of copyright. This includes, most importantly, conflicts related to the commission of plagiarism and/or scientific fraud.
Plagiarism is understood to include:
1. Presenting the work of others as your own.
2. Adopting words or ideas from other authors without due recognition.
3. Not using quotation marks or another distinctive format to distinguish literal quotations.
4. Giving incorrect information about the true source of a citation.
5. The paraphrasing of a source without mentioning the source.
6. Excessive paraphrasing, even if the source is mentioned.
Practices constituting scientific fraud are as follows:
1. Fabrication, falsification or omission of data and plagiarism.
2. Duplicate publication.
3. Conflicts of authorship.
