“The Moral Superiority of the Woman”: about the Racialized Standard of Feminity in Chile
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18042/hp.36.09Keywords:
Moral, femininity, race, nationAbstract
This article problematizes the historical conditions of emergence of the «discourse of moral superiority of women», rhetoric of legitimate femininity in Chile under which there would be a set of «properly feminine» qualities that are here to humanize, renovate and clean the public space and politics. I will argue that the main sociohistorical configurations in which this discourse emerges, correspond to the proliferation of public debates around gender, race and the nation in the late nineteenth and early twentieth century.In the first section of the article I will present the nationalist configuration in which sex-racialized imagery of «national family» would emerge. In the second section, I will discuss some of the discursive practices of othering who answer the call of the civilizing mission, including the racialized figure of «the popular mother» that takes the central place to understand the emergence of the discourse of «the moral superiority of the woman» in Chile at the time. Finally, I will suggest some conclusions proposing a look of bewilderment and denaturation in relation to «the unmarked normal» of the category «woman» in Chile.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2016 Antonieta Vera Gajardo

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors whose contributions are accepted for publication in this journal, accept the following terms:
a. The authors retain their copyright and guarantee to the magazine the right of first publication of their work, which will be simultaneously subject to the Creative Commons Attribution License Attribution-Noncommercial-No derivative works 4.0 Spain, which allows third parties to share the work as long as its author and its first publication is indicated.
b. Authors may adopt other non-exclusive license agreements to distribute the version of the published work (e.g. deposit in an institutional repository or archive, or published in a monographic volume) provided the initial publication in this journal is indicated.
PLAGIARISM AND SCIENTIFIC FRAUD
The publication of work that infringes on intellectual property rights is the sole responsibility of the authors, including any conflicts that may occur regarding infringement of copyright. This includes, most importantly, conflicts related to the commission of plagiarism and/or scientific fraud.
Plagiarism is understood to include:
1. Presenting the work of others as your own.
2. Adopting words or ideas from other authors without due recognition.
3. Not using quotation marks or another distinctive format to distinguish literal quotations.
4. Giving incorrect information about the true source of a citation.
5. The paraphrasing of a source without mentioning the source.
6. Excessive paraphrasing, even if the source is mentioned.
Practices constituting scientific fraud are as follows:
1. Fabrication, falsification or omission of data and plagiarism.
2. Duplicate publication.
3. Conflicts of authorship.



