Images and ambivalences of Spanish policy toward slavery in Morocco (1880-1930)
Keywords:
Abolitionism, colonialism, slavery, Morocco, stereotypes, classification systemsAbstract
In this study I show the racialist images that Spanish Africanism built about the Black-Africans in Morocco between 1880 and 1930 and the ambivalence of colonial policy toward that population, who mostly lived in a subordinated position or in slavery. The main sources used in this exercise of anthropological history are the Spanish colonial archives. The prevalent stereotype during this period was based on a hierarchical classification system that naturalized the subordinate position of Black-Africans and place them on a lower scale of civilization as compared to other North African populations. The slave trade and the social position they occupied in Morocco led to diversity of opinion among africanists. One the one hand, there were abolitionist views that considered slavery intolerable, while others defined it as respectable, for pragmatic reasons or through a relativistic and comprehensive exercise toward some forms of servitude that were presented as milder as compared to other colonial situations. Following the instauration of the Protectorate in 1912, the colonial administration preferred to adopt this strategic respect of servility in order to not antagonize the local elites; so this administration resisted the pressures of the League of Nations in the early 1920’s and never abolished explicitly slavery, or just hid its presence from the public sphere.Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2016 Josep Lluís Mateo Dieste

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors whose contributions are accepted for publication in this journal, accept the following terms:
a. The authors retain their copyright and guarantee to the magazine the right of first publication of their work, which will be simultaneously subject to the Creative Commons Attribution License Attribution-Noncommercial-No derivative works 4.0 Spain, which allows third parties to share the work as long as its author and its first publication is indicated.
b. Authors may adopt other non-exclusive license agreements to distribute the version of the published work (e.g. deposit in an institutional repository or archive, or published in a monographic volume) provided the initial publication in this journal is indicated.
PLAGIARISM AND SCIENTIFIC FRAUD
The publication of work that infringes on intellectual property rights is the sole responsibility of the authors, including any conflicts that may occur regarding infringement of copyright. This includes, most importantly, conflicts related to the commission of plagiarism and/or scientific fraud.
Plagiarism is understood to include:
1. Presenting the work of others as your own.
2. Adopting words or ideas from other authors without due recognition.
3. Not using quotation marks or another distinctive format to distinguish literal quotations.
4. Giving incorrect information about the true source of a citation.
5. The paraphrasing of a source without mentioning the source.
6. Excessive paraphrasing, even if the source is mentioned.
Practices constituting scientific fraud are as follows:
1. Fabrication, falsification or omission of data and plagiarism.
2. Duplicate publication.
3. Conflicts of authorship.



