Territorialist landscape plans: analysis of the degree of consistency with the analytical methodology for the identity project of the territory
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37230/CyTET.2021.209.03Keywords:
Piano di Indirizzo Territoriale della Regione Toscana, Piano Paesaggistico Territoriale della Regione Toscana, Analytical methodology, Adaptation, Lansdcape planAbstract
This article aims to assess the degree of consistency between the landscape plans developed by the territorialist school and the analytical methodology for the identity project of the territory. This analytical methodology is grounded on three pillars that are identified in a first section. The structures of Piano di Indirizzo Territoriale della Regione Toscana and of Piano Paesaggistico Territoriale della Regione Puglia, both developed by following the territorialist presumptions, are analysed afterwards. Special attention is paid to convergencies and divergencies between the plans’ sections and the phases in which the analytical methodology is thought to be divided. A synthesis of the comparative analysis of both instruments allows us to make a proposal to systematize the interventions on the landscape adjusted to the territorialist theoretical assumptions.
Downloads
References
Butler, A. (2016): Dynamics of integrating landscape values in landscape character assessment: the hidden dominance of the objective outsider. Landscape Reseach, vol. 41, n.º 2: 239-252. https://doi.org/10.1080/01426397.2015.1135315
Butler & Berglund, U. (2014): Landscape Character Assessment as an approach to understanding public interests within the European Landscape Convention. Landscape Research, vol. 39, n.º 3: 219-236. https://doi.org/10.1080/01426397.2012.716404
Choay, F. (2008): Del destino della città, Florencia, Italia, Alinea.
Codice dei beni culturali e del paesaggio (2004): Codice dei beni culturali e del paesaggio, aprobado por el Decreto Legislativo del 22 de enero de 2004, n. 42, con arreglo al art. 10 de la Legge de 6 de julio de 2002, n. 137 (G.U. n. 45 del 24 de febrero de 2004, n. 28).
De Europa, C. (2001): Convención Europea del Paisaje. Florencia 20.X.2000. Ciudad y Territorio Estudios Territoriales (CyTET), vol. 33, n.º 128: 353-357. Recuperado a partir de https://recyt.fecyt.es/index.php/CyTET/article/view/75037
Dematteis, G. & Magnaghi, A. (2018): Patrimonio territoriale e coralità produttiva: nuove frontiere per i sistemi economici local. Scienze del Territorio, n.º 6: 12-25. https://doi.org/10.13128/Scienze_Territorio-24362
Maggio, M. (2014): Invarianti strutturali nel governo del territorio, Florencia, Italia, Firenze University Press.
Magnaghi, A. (2000): Il progetto locale, Turín, Italia, Bollati Boringhieri.
Magnaghi, A. 2001): Una metodologia analitica per la progettazione identitaria del territorio. En A. Magnaghi (Coord.): Rappresentare i luoghi: metodi e technique (pp. 13-51), Florencia, Italia, Alinea.
Magnaghi, A. (2005): “Presentazione: Il ritorno dei luoghi nel progetto”. En A. Magnaghi, (Coord.): La rappresentazione identitaria del territorio. Atlanti, codici, figure, paradigmi per il progetto locale (pp. 7-18), Florencia, Italia, Alinea.
Magnaghi, A. (Coord.) (2010): Montespertoli: le mappe di comunità per lo statuto del territorio, Florencia, Italia, Alinea.
Magnaghi, A. (2012): “Le ragioni di una sfida”. En A. Magnaghi (Coord.): Il territorio bene comune (pp. 11-30), Florencia, Italia, Firenze University Press.
Magnaghi, A. (Coord.) (2016): La pianificazione paesaggistica in Italia: stato dell’arte e innovazioni, Florencia, Italia, Firenze University Press.
Marson, A. (2015): The Path of Approval of the Landscape Plan of the Tuscany Region. Il Ponte, vol. 71, n.º 1: 63-73.
_____ (2019): The Case of Landscape Planning in Italy. Ri-vista: Ricerche per la progettazione del paesaggio, vol. 17, n.º 2: 16-24. https://doi.org/10.13128/rv-8311
Martínez de Pisón, E. (2009): Los paisajes de los geógrafos. Geographicalia, n.º 55: 5-25.
Mata-Olmo, R. & Ferrer-Jimenez, D. (2021): La protección, gestión y mejora del paisaje en España. Ciudad y Territorio Estudios Territoriales (CyTET), vol. LIII, n.º 207: 189-214. https://doi.org/10.37230/CyTET.2021.207.12.
Merino del Río, R. (2020): Criteria for Designing Cultural Itineraries as a Strategy for Restoring the Dynamics of Cultural Landscape Formation. Ri-vista: Research for Landscape Architecture, vol. 18, n.º 2: 238-263. https://doi.org/10.13128/rv-8093
Merino del Río, R. (2021): Del paisaje cultural al patrimonio territorial, y viceversa: una conversión necesaria para un proyecto de paisaje desde el patrimonio. Ciudades, n.º 34: 191-205. https://doi.org/10.24197/ciudades.24.2021.191-205
Pedroli, B., Pinto-Correia, T. & Cornish, P. (2006a): Landscape – What’s in It? European Landscape Research at a Turning Point. Landscape Ecology, vol. 21, n.º 3: 313. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-005-5226-z
Pedroli, B., Pinto-Correia, T. & Cornish, P. (2006b): Landscape — What’s in It? Trends in European Landscape Science and Priority Themes for Concerted Research. Landscape Ecology, vol. 21, n.º 3: 421-30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-005-5204-5
PIT Toscana (2015): Piano di indirizzo territoriale con valenza di Piano Paesaggistico della Regione Toscana, aprobado en virtud de las deliberaciones del Consejo de Gobierno regional n. 37 de 27 de marzo de 2015 (BURT n. 28 de 20 de mayo de 2015).
PPTR Puglia (2015): Piano Paesaggistico Territoriale della Regione Puglia, adoptado en virtud de las deliberaciones del Gobierno regional n. 1435 de 2 de agosto de 2013 (BURP n. 108 de 6 de agosto de 2013).
Poli, D. (2011): “Rappresentazioni identitarie e processi partecipativi per la salvaguardia del patrimonio territoriale”. En M. Volpiano (Coord.): Territorio storico e paesaggio: conservazione progetto gestione (pp. 55-71), Turín, Italia, L’Artistica Editrice.
Poli, D. (Coord.) (2012): Regole e progetti per il paesaggio: verso il nuovo piano paesaggistico della Toscana, Florencia, Italia, Firenze University Press.
Poli, D. Coord.) (2013): Agricoltura paesaggistica. Visioni, metodi, esperienze, Florencia, Italia, Alinea.
Poli, D. (2015a): “Il patrimonio territoriale fra capitale e risorsa nei processi di patrimonializzazione proattiva”. En B. Meloni (Coord.): Aree interne e progetti d’area (pp. 123-140), París, Francia, Eterotopia.
Poli, D. (2015b): La sfida dei Piani paesaggistici di nuova generazione: il caso toscano. Archivio di Storia dell’Urbanistica e del Paesaggio, n.º 2: 147-152.
Poli, D. (2018): Formes et figures du projet local: La patrimonialisation contemporaine du territoire, París, Francia, Editions Etérotopia.
Poli, D. (2019): Le comunità progettuali della bioregione urbana: un parco agricolo multifunzionale in riva sinistra d’Arno, Macerata, Italia, Quodlibet.
Poli, D. (2020): “La aproximación patrimonial como base del proyecto integrado de territorio”. R. Merino del Río (Trad.). En A. Tejedor, M. Linares, M. López & R. Merino (Coords.): Innovación para la gestión integrada del patrimonio, el paisaje y el turismo (pp. 18-49), Sevilla, Valladolid, Editorial Universidad de Sevilla, Ediciones Universidad de Valladolid.
Quaini, M. (2001): “Introduzione”. En D. Poli: Attraversare le immagini del territorio: un percorso fra geografia e pianificazione (pp. 5-6), Florencia, Italia, All’Insegna del Giglio.
Raffestin, C. (1984): “Territorializzazione, deterritorializzazione, riterritorializzazione e informazione”. En A. Turco (Coord.): Regione e regionalizzazione (pp. 69-82), Milán, Angeli.
Revista, L. (2008): Convenio Europeo del Paisaje. Publicada la ratificación, por parte de España, del Convenio Europeo del Paisaje. Ciudad y Territorio Estudios Territoriales (CyTET), vol. 40, n.º 155: 199-203. Recuperado a partir de https://recyt.fecyt.es/index.php/CyTET/article/view/75847
Santos y Ganges, L. (2002-2003): Las nociones de paisaje y sus implicaciones en la ordenación. Ciudades, n.º 7: 41-68.
Swanwick, C. (2002): Landscape Character Assessment: guidance for England and Scotland. Recuperado a partir de https://www.nature.scot/sites/default/files/2018-02/Publication%202002%20-%20Landscape%20Character%20Assessment%20guidance%20for%20England%20and%20Scotland.pdf.
Troitiño Vinuesa, M.Á. (2011): Territorio, patrimonio y paisaje: desafíos de una ordenación y gestión inteligentes. Ciudad y Territorio Estudios Territoriales (CyTET), vol. 43, n.º 169: 561-569. Recuperado a partir de https://recyt.fecyt.es/index.php/CyTET/article/view/76083
Vidal de la Blache, P. (1894): Atlas général. Histoire el Géographie, París, Francia, Armand Colin.
Vidal de la Blache, P. (1922): Principes de la géographie humaine, París, Francia, Armand Colin.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Rebeca Merino del Río
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Considering the provisions of the current legislation on Intellectual Property, and in accordance with them, all authors publishing in CyTET give -in a non-exclusive way and without time limit- to the Ministry of Transport, Mobility and Urban Agenda the rights to disseminate, reproduce, communicate and distribute in any current or future format, on paper or electronic, the original or derived version of their work under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivative 4.0 license International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), as well as to include or assign to third parties the inclusion of its content in national and international indexes, repositories and databases, with reference and recognition in any case of its authorship.
In addition, when sending the work, the author(s) declares that it is an original work in which the sources that have been used are recognized, committing to respect the scientific evidence, to no longer modify the original data and to verify or refute its hypothesis. Author(s) also declare that the essential content of the work has not been previously published nor will it be published in any other publication while it is under evaluation by CyTET; and that it has not been simultaneously sent to another journal.
Authors must sign a Transfer of Rights Form, which will be sent to them from the CyTET Secretariat once the article is accepted for publication.
With the aim of promoting the dissemination of knowledge, CyTET joins the Open Journal Access (OA) movement and delivers all of its content to various national and international indexes, repositories and databases under this protocol; therefore, the submission of a work to be published in the journal presupposes the explicit acceptance by the author of this distribution method.
Authors are encouraged to reproduce and host their work published in CyTET in institutional repositories, web pages, etc. with the intention of contributing to the improvement of the transfer of knowledge and the citation of said works.