Proximidad y Funciones Urbanas en las Ciudades Mediterráneas Españolas: perspectivas desde la Ciudad de 15 Minutos
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37230/CyTET.2025.226.10Palabras clave:
Ciudad de 15 Minutos, Proximidad, Ciudades mediterráneas, Movilidad activaResumen
Este artículo analiza la distribución espacial de los entornos de proximidad en Barcelona, Valencia, Palma de Mallorca y Granada desde la perspectiva de la ciudad de 15 minutos. La ciudad de 15 minutos es un concepto de planificación urbana que postula poder alcanzar las necesidades diarias en 15 minutos a pie o en bicicleta (Moreno et al., 2021). La investigación aborda la falta de análisis empírico en España sobre este concepto. Se emplea la estimación de tiempos mínimos de acceso a pie a 25 destinos cotidianos en una malla ortogonal de 100x100 metros. Los resultados indican que las zonas altamente accesibles se asemejan más a una ciudad de 5 minutos, especialmente para servicios educativos. La baja accesibilidad en algunas áreas comporta déficits significativos en acceso a destinos básicos, generando dependencia del automóvil y segregación social. Además, los servicios públicos se distribuyen más uniformemente que los privados. Estos hallazgos contribuyen a entender las dinámicas urbanas específicas de cada ciudad y proporcionan herramientas para adaptar políticas públicas.
Descargas
Citas
ABDELFATTAH, L., DEPONTE, D. & FOSSA, G. (2022): The 15-minute city as a hybrid model for Milan. (Italy) TeMA- Journal of Land Use, Mobility and Environment, 71–86. https://hdl.handle.net/11311/1198473
ALBERTI, F. & RADICCHI, A. (2022): The Proximity City: A comparative analysis between Paris, Barcelona and Milan. (Italy) Techne-Journal of Technology for Architecture and Environment, 23, 69–77. https://doi.org/10.36253/techne-12151
ALLAM, Z. (2022): Unpacking the ‘15-Minute City’ via 6G, IoT, and Digital Twins: Towards a New Narrative for Increasing Urban Efficiency, Resilience, and Sustainability. (Switzerland) Sensors, 22(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/s22041369
ALLAM, Z., BIBRI, S. E., CHABAUD, D. & MORENO, C. (2022): The Theoretical, Practical, and Technological Foundations of the 15-Minute City Model: Proximity and Its Environmental, Social and Economic Benefits for Sustainability. (Switzerland) Energies, 15(16), 6042. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15166042
ALLAM, Z., NIEUWENHUIJSEN, M., CHABAUD, D. & MORENO, C. (2022): The 15-minute city offers a new framework for sustainability, liveability, and health. (UK) The Lancet Planetary Health, 6(3), e181–e183. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2542-5196(22)00014-6
ALVES, F. B., CRUZ, S. S. , RIBEIRO, A., SILVA, A. B., MARTINS, J. P. & CUNHA, I. R. P. F. D. (2020): Walkability index for elderly health: a proposal. (Switzerland) Sustainability, 12(18), 7360. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12187360
ARIAS, A. (2018): Turisme i gentrificació: apunts des de Barcelona. (Spain) Papers: Regió Metropolitana de Barcelona: Territori, estratègies, planejament, 60, 130-139. https://raco.cat/index.php/PapersIERMB/article/view/339245
BANDINI, S. & GASPARINI, F. (2021): Social and active inclusion of the elderly in the city through affective walkability. (Japan) The Review of Socionetwork Strategies, 15(2), 557-573. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12626-021-00091-8
BARRETT, G. (1996): The transport dimension. In M. Jenks, E. Burton, & K. Williams (Eds.), The compact city: A sustainable urban form? (pp. 171–180). (UK) E & FN Spon.
BARTER, P. A. (2000): Transport Dilemmas in Dense Urban Areas: Examples from Eastern Asia. In M. JENKS & R. BURGESS (Eds.), Compact Cities: Sustainable Urban Forms for Developing Countries (pp. 271–284). (UK) Spon Press.
BARTZOKAS-TSIOMPRAS, A. & BAKOGIANNIS, E. (2022): Quantifying and visualizing the 15-Minute walkable city concept across Europe: A multicriteria approach. (UK) Journal of Maps, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/17445647.2022.2141143
BOCCA, A. (2021): Public space and 15-minute city. A conceptual exploration for the functional reconfiguration of proximity city. (Italy) TeMA-Journal of Land Use, Mobility and Environment, 14(3), 395–410. https://doi.org/10.6093/1970-9870/8062
BOTH, A., GUNN, L., HIGGS, C., DAVERN, M., JAFARI, A., BOULANGE, C. & GILES-CORTI, B. (2022): Achieving “Active” 30 Minute Cities: How Feasible Is It to Reach Work within 30 Minutes Using Active Transport Modes? (Switzerland) ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi11010058
BREHENY, M. (1996): Centrists, decentrists and compromisers: Views on the future of urban form. (UK) In The compact city: A sustainable urban form (pp. 13–35). http://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=ZAeZti784w4C&oi=fnd&pg=PA10&dq=Centrists,+d ecentrists+and+compromisers:+Views+on+the+future+of+urban+form&ots=1Sex0M44xz&sig=I_G yZQdhpZIJTACGBEkC2r_Oz9Q
BURGESS, R. (2000): The compact city debate. In M. JENKS & R. BURGESS (Eds.), Compact Cities: Sustainable Urban Forms for Developing Countries (pp. 9–24). (UK) Spon Press.
BURTON, E. (2000): The Compact City: Just or Just Compact? A Preliminary Analysis. (UK) Urban Studies, 37(11), 1969–2006. https://doi.org/10.1080/00420980050162184
CASARIN, G., MACLEAVY, J. & MANLEY, D. (2023): Rethinking urban utopianism: The fallacy of social mix in the 15-minute city. (UK) Urban Studies, 004209802311691. https://doi.org/10.1177/00420980231169174
CASELLI, B., CARRA, M., ROSSETTI, S. & ZAZZI, M. (2021): From urban planning techniques to 15-minute neighbourhoods. A theoretical framework and GIS-based analysis of pedestrian accessibility to public services. (Italy) European Transport/Trasporti Europei, 85. https://doi.org/10.48295/ET.2021.85.10
CORREA-PARRA, J., VERGARA-PERUCICH, J. F. & AGUIRRE-NUÑEZ, C. (2020): Towards a Walkable City: Principal Component Analysis for Defining Sub-Centralities in the Santiago Metropolitan Area. (Switzerland) Land, 9(362). https://doi.org/10.3390/land9100362
DA-SILVA, D. C., KING, D. A. & LEMAR, S. (2020): Accessibility in practice: 20-minute city as a sustainability planning goal. (Switzerland) Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU12010129
DE-LA-CRUZ-MERA, A. (2019): La agenda urbana española. (Spain) Cytet Monográfico 2019, 51(202), 675-686. https://recyt.fecyt.es/index.php/CyTET/issue/view/3774/548
DELBOSC, A. & CURRIE, G. (2011): The spatial context of transport disadvantage, social exclusion and well- being. (UK) Journal of Transport Geography, 19(6), 1130–1137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2011.04.005
DI-MARINO, M., TOMAZ, E., HENRIQUES, C. & CHAVOSHI, S. H. (2023): The 15-minute city concept and new working spaces: A planning perspective from Oslo and Lisbon. (UK) European Planning Studies, 31(3), 598–620. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2022.2082837
DING, P. & FENG, S. (2022): How school travel affects children’s psychological well-being and academic achievement in China. (UK) International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(21), 13881. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192113881
FAJARDO-MAGRANER, F. (2020): Nuevos enfoques en el estudio de la accesibilidad a los servicios públicos. Un estudio aplicado a los centros que imparten el segundo ciclo de educación infantil en la ciudad de valencia. Tesis. (Spain) Valencia: Universitat de València.
FERRÉ-CURTIDO, P. & MIGUÉ-LORENZO, S. (2018): Evaluación de la accesibilidad y la longitudinalidad de la Atención Primaria de Granada mediante Primary Care Assessment Tools (PCAT). (Spain) Journal of Healthcare Quality Research, 33(3), 121-129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhqr.2018.02.001
FERRER-ORTIZ, C, MARQUET, O., MOJICA, L. & VICH, G. (2022): Barcelona under the 15-Minute City Lens: Mapping the Accessibility and Proximity Potential Based on Pedestrian Travel Times. (Switzerland) Smart Cities, 5, 146–161. https://doi.org/10.3390/smartcities5010010
GAGLIONE, F. (2022): Urban accessibility in a 15-minute city: A measure in the city of Naples, Italy.(Italy) Transportation Research Procedia, 60 (Query date: 2022-11-23 14:23:32), 378–385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2021.12.049
GIL-SOLÁ, A. & VILHELMSON, B. (2018): Negotiating proximity in sustainable urban planning: A Swedish case. (Switzerland) Sustainability (Switzerland), 11(1), 12–14. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11010031
GIL-SOLÁ, A., VILHELMSON, B. & LARSSON, A. (2018): Understanding sustainable accessibility in urban planning: Themes of consensus, themes of tension. (UK) Journal of Transport Geography, 70(May), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2018.05.010
GLOCK, J.-P. & GERLACH, J. (2023): Berlin Pankow: A 15-min city for everyone? A case study combining accessibility, traffic noise, air pollution, and socio-structural data. (Belgium) European Transport Research Review, 15(1), 7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12544-023-00577-2
GOWER, A. & GRODACH, C. (2022): Planning Innovation or City Branding? Exploring How Cities Operationalise the 20-Minute Neighbourhood Concept. (UK) Urban Policy and Research, 40(1), 36–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/08111146.2021.2019701
GUZMAN, L. A., ARELLANA, J., OVIEDO, D. & MONCADA-ARISTIZÁBAL, C. A. (2021): COVID-19, activity and mobility patterns in Bogotá. Are we ready for a ‘15-minute city’? (The Netherlands) Travel Behaviour and Society, 24, 245–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tbs.2021.04.008
HANANEL, R. & BERECHMAN, J. (2016): Justice and transportation decision-making: The capabilities approach. (UK) Transport Policy, 49, 78–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2016.04.005
HANDY, S. (2020): Is accessibility an idea whose time has finally come? (USA) Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 83, 102319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2020.102319
HOLLE, V., CAUWENBERG, J., DYCK, D., DEFORCHE, B., WEGHE, N. & BOURDEAUDHUIJ, I. (2014): Relationship between neighborhood walkability and older adults’ physical activity: results from the Belgian environmental physical activity study in seniors (bepas seniors). (USA) International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-014-0110-3
HOSFORD, K. (2022): Is the 15-minute city within reach? Evaluating walking and cycling accessibility to grocery stores in Vancouver. (USA) Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 14(Query date: 2022-11-23 14:23:32). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2022.100602
HOU, L. & YUNGANG, L. (2017): Life circle construction in China under the idea of collaborative governance: A comparative study of Beijing, Shanghai, and Guangzhou. (Japan) Geographical Review of Japan Series B, 90(1), 2–16. https://doi.org/10.4157/geogrevjapanb.90.2
KENT, J. L. & MULLEY, C. (2018): Transport disadvantage, social exclusion, and subjective wellbeing: The role of the neighbourhood environment—Evidence from Sydney, Australia 1. (USA) Journal of Transport and Land Use, 11(1), 31–47. https://doi.org/10.5198/jtlu.2018.1008
KESAROVSKI, T. & HERNÁNDEZ-PALACIO, F. (2022): Time, the other dimension of urban form: Measuring the relationship between urban density and accessibility to grocery shops in the 10-minute city. (UK) Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, 0(0), 239980832211032. https://doi.org/10.1177/23998083221103259
KHAVARIAN-GARMSIR, A. R., SHARIFI, A., HAJIAN-HOSSEIN-ABADI, M. & MORADI, Z. (2023): From Garden City to 15-Minute City: A Historical Perspective and Critical Assessment. (Switzerland) Land, 12(2), 512. https://doi.org/10.3390/land12020512
KISSFAZEKAS, K. (2022): Circle of paradigms? Or “15-minute” neighbourhoods from the 1950s. (UK) Cities, 123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2022.103587
LEVINE, J., GRENGS, J., SHEN, Q. & SHEN, Q. (2012): Does Accessibility Require Density or Speed? (USA) Journal of the American Planning Association, 78(2), 157–172. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944363.2012.677119
LI, C., XIA, W. & CHAI, Y. (2021): Delineation of an Urban Community Life Circle Based on a Machine- Learning Estimation of Spatiotemporal Behavioral Demand. (China) Chinese Geographical Science, 31(1), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11769-021-1174-z
LI, Z., ZHENG, J. & ZHANG, Y. (2019): Study on the Layout of 15-Minute Community-Life Circle in Third-Tier Cities Based on POI: Baoding City of Hebei Province. (China) Engineering, 11(09), 592–603. https://doi.org/10.4236/eng.2019.119041
LOADER, I. (2023): 15-minute cities and the denial(s) of auto-freedom. (UK) IPPR Progressive Review, 30, 56-60. https://doi.org/10.1111/newe.12330
LOBNER, N., SEIXAS, P. C., DIAS, R. C. & VIDAL, D. G. (2021): Urban Compactivity Models: Screening City Trends for the Urgency of Social and Environmental Sustainability. (Switzerland) Urban Science, 5(4), 83. https://doi.org/10.3390/urbansci5040083
LOGAN, T. M., HOBBS, M. H., CONROW, L. C., REID, N. L., YOUNG, R. A. & ANDERSON, M. J. (2022): The x-minute city: Measuring the 10, 15, 20-minute city and an evaluation of its use for sustainable urban design. (UK) Cities, 131, 103924. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2022.103924
LU, M. & DIAB, E. (2023): Understanding the determinants of x-minute city policies: A review of the North American and Australian cities’ planning documents. (UK) Journal of Urban Mobility, 3, 100040. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urbmob.2022.100040
MARCHIGIANI, E. & BONFANTINI, B. (2022): Urban Transition and the Return of Neighbourhood Planning. Questioning the Proximity Syndrome and the 15-Minute City. (Switzerland) Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(9). https://doi.org/10.3390/su14095468
MARQUET, O. (2015): Redescubrir la proximidad urbana. Componentes socioespaciales de la movilidad cotidiana sostenible en Barcelona. (Spain) Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.
MARQUET, O., MACIEJEWSKA, M., DELCLÒS-ALIÓ, X. VICH, G., SCHIPPERJIN, J. & MIRALLES-GUASCH, C. (2020): Physical activity benefits of attending a senior center depend largely on age and gender. A study using GPS and accelerometry data. (UK) BMC Geriatrics, 20, 134. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-020-01527-6
MARQUET-SARDA, O. & MIRALLES-GUASCH, C. (2014): The use of proximity in Barcelona. An analysis through daily travel times. (Spain) Ciudades, 17(1), 99–120.
MARQUET, O. & MIRALLES-GUASCH, C. (2015): The Walkable city and the importance of the proximity environments for Barcelona’s everyday mobility. (UK) Cities, 42, 258–266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2014.10.012
MARQUET-SARDA, O. & MIRALLES-GUASCH, C. (2016): Introducing urban vitality as a determinant of children’s healthy mobility habits: A focus on activity engagement and physical activity. (UK) Children’s Geographies, 14(6), 656–669. https://doi.org/10.1080/14733285.2016.1157572
MIRALLES-GUASCH, C. & MARQUET-SARDA, O. (2013): Dinámicas de proximidad en ciudades multifuncionales. (Spain) CyTET Ciudad y Territorio, Estudios Territoriales, XLV (177), 503–512.
MORENO, C. (2020): Vie urbaine et proximité à l’heure du COVID-19? (France) Éditions de l’Observatoire 170.
MORENO, C., ALLAM, Z., CHABAUD, D. ,GALL, C. & PRATLONG, F. (2021): Introducing the “15-Minute City”: Sustainability, Resilience and Place Identity in Future Post-Pandemic Cities. (Switzerland) Smart Cities, 4, 93– 111. https://doi.org/10.3390/smartcities4010006
NEWMAN, P. & KENWORTHY, J. R. (1989): Gasoline consumption and cities. (USA) Journal of American Planning Association, 55(1), 24–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944368908975398
NOWOROL, A. , KOPYCINSKI, P., HALAT, P., SALAMON, J. & HOLUJ, A. (2022): The 15-Minute City-The Geographical Proximity of Services in Krakow. (Switzerland) Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(12). https://doi.org/10.3390/su14127103
PAJARES, E., BÜTTNER, B., JEHLE, U, NICHOLS, A. & WULFHORST, G. (2021): Accessibility by proximity: Addressing the lack of interactive accessibility instruments for active mobility. (UK) Journal of Transport Geography, 93, 103080. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2021.103080
PAPAS, T., BASBAS, S. & CAMPISI, T. (2023): Urban mobility evolution and the 15-minute city model: from holistic to bottom-up approach. (Italy) Transportation Research Procedia, 69(2), 544-551. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2023.02.206
PEREIRA, R. H. M., SCHWANEN, T. & BANISTER, D. (2017): Distributive justice and equity in transportation. (UK) Transport Reviews, 37(2), 170–191. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2016.1257660
PITARCH-GARRIDO, M. D. & ALBERTOS-PUEBLA, J. M. A. (2011): Sostenibilidad social en espacios metropolitanos. Análisis de accesibilidad a la oferta de servicios públicos en el área metropolitana de Valencia. (Spain) Servicios, globalización y territorio: V Congreso Geografía de los servicios (pp. 289-310).
PITARCH-GARRIDO, M. D. & FAJARDO-MAGRANER, F. (2019): Vulnerabilidad territorial y accesibilidad a los servicios de proximidad para las personas mayores en la ciudad de Valencia. (Spain) Revista de Estudios Andaluces, 38, 83-100. https://doi.org/10.12795/rea.2019.i38.05
PITARCH-GARRIDO, M. D., SALOM-CARRASCO, J. & FAJARDO-MAGRANER, F. (2018): Detección de barrios vulnerables a partir de la accesibilidad a los servicios públicos de proximidad. El caso de la ciudad de Valencia. (Spain) Anales de Geografía de la Universidad Complutense, 38(1), p. 61.
PIZARRO, A.N., RIBEIRO, J.C., MARQUES, E.A., MOTA, J. & SANTOS, M.P. (2013): Is walking to school associated with improved metabolic health? (UK) International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 10(12). https://doi.org/10.1186/1479-5868-10-12
POT, F. J., VAN-WEE, B. & TILLEMA, T. (2021): Perceived accessibility: What it is and why it differs from calculated accessibility measures based on spatial data. (UK) Journal of Transport Geography, 94, 103090. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2021.103090
POZOUKIDOU, G. & CHATZIYIANNAKI, Z. (2021): 15-minute city: Decomposing the new urban planning Eutopia. (Switzerland) Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(2), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13020928
PROFFITT, D. G., BARTHOLOMEW, K., EWING, R. & MILLER, H. J. (2019): Accessibility planning in American metropolitan areas: Are we there yet? (UK) Urban Studies, 56(1), 167–192. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098017710122
SAMSON, C. & FREUDENDAL-PEDERSEN, M. (2022): Restructuring urban planning to facilitate sustainable consumption. (Switzerland) Frontiers in Sustainability, 3, 918546. https://doi.org/10.3389/frsus.2022.918546
SÁNCHEZ-GONZÁLEZ, D. (2009): Geografía del envejecimiento vulnerable y su contexto ambiental en la ciudad de Granada: Discapacidad, dependencia y exclusión social. (Spain) Cuadernos Geográficos, 45, 107-135. https://revistaseug.ugr.es/index.php/cuadgeo/article/view/759
SONG, G., HE, X., KONG, Y., LI, K., SONG, H., ZHAI, S. & LUO, J. (2022): Improving the Spatial Accessibility of Community-Level Healthcare Service toward the “15-Minute City” Goal in China. (Switzerland) ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 11(8). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi11080436
SORIA, J. (2011): Modelo de umbrales para la evaluación ambiental de la movilidad urbana. Tesis. Departamento de Urbanística y Ordenación del Territorio. (Spain) Granada: Universidad de Granada.
STANLEY, J. & STANLEY, J. (2014): Achieving the 20-minute city for Melbourne: Turning our city upside down. (Issue August, pp. 1–25). (Australia) Bus Association Victoria.
STATE GOVERNMENT OF VICTORIA (2014): Plan Melbourne. Metropolitan Planning Strategy (p. 123). (Australia) State Government of Victoria.
STATE GOVERNMENT OF VICTORIA (2019): 20-Minute Neighbourhoods: Creating a More Liveable Melbourne (pp. 1–48). (Australia) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2019.100773
WAN, J., ZHAO, Y., ZHANG, K., SONG, X., SU, Y., ZHANG, S., SUN, H., WANG, Z, WU, H., LI, M., TANG, X., CAO, Y., ZHANG, L. & YANG, J. (2022): Healthy Community-Life Circles Planning Combining Objective Measurement and Subjective Evaluation: Theoretical and Empirical Research. (Switzerland) International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3999215
WATSON, A., TIMPERIO, A., BROWN, H., BEST, K.& HESKETH, K. (2017): Effect of classroom-based physical activity interventions on academic and physical activity outcomes: a systematic review and meta- analysis. (UK) International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-017-0569-9
WENG, M., DING, N., LI, J., JIN, X., XIAO, H., HE, Z. & SU, S. (2019): The 15-minute walkable neighborhoods: Measurement, social inequalities, and implications for building healthy communities in urban China. (The Netherlands) Journal of Transport and Health, 13(129), 259–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2019.05.005
ZHANG, S., ZHEN, F., KONG, Y., LOBSANG, T.& ZOU, S. (2022): Towards a 15-minute city: A network-based evaluation framework. (UK) Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science. https://doi.org/10.1177/23998083221118570
ZHANG, W., LU, D., ZHAO, Y., LUO, X. & YIN, J. (2022): Incorporating polycentric development and neighborhood life-circle planning for reducing driving in Beijing: Nonlinear and threshold analysis. (UK) Cities, 121, 103488. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2021.103488
ZUO, J., MENG, L., LI, C., ZHANG, H., ZENG, Y. & DONG, J. (2020): Construction of community life circle database based on high-resolution remote sensing technology and multi-source data fusion. (Italy) European Journal of Remote Sensing, 00(00), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/22797254.2020.1763208
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2025 Serena Mombelli
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.
Sin perjuicio de lo dispuesto en la legislación vigente sobre Propiedad Intelectual, y conforme a la misma, el/la los/las autor/a/es/as que publiquen en CyTET cede/n a título gratuito, de modo no exclusivo y sin límite temporal al Ministerio de Transportes, Movilidad y Agenda Urbana los derechos para difundir, reproducir, comunicar y distribuir en cualquier formato actual o futuro, en papel o electrónico, la versión original o derivada de su obra bajo licencia de Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-SinObraDerivada 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), así como para incluir o ceder a terceros la inclusión de su contenido en índices, repositorios y bases de datos nacionales e internacionales, con referencia y reconocimiento en todo caso de la autoría del mismo.
Además, al realizar el envío, el/la los/las autor/a/es/as declara/n que se trata de un trabajo original en el que se reconocen las fuentes que han sido utilizadas en su estudio, comprometiéndose a respetar la evidencia científica y a no modificar los datos originales para verificar o refutar una hipótesis de partida; que el contenido esencial del mismo no ha sido publicado previamente ni se publicará en ninguna otra obra o revista mientras esté en proceso de evaluación en la revista CyTET; y que no se ha remitido simultáneamente a otra publicación.
Los autores deben firmar un Formulario de Cesión de Derechos, que les será enviado desde la Secretaría de CyTET una vez se acepte su artículo para ser publicado.
Con el objetivo de favorecer la difusión del conocimiento, CyTET se adhiere al movimiento de revistas de Open Access (OA) y entrega la totalidad de sus contenidos a diversos índices, repositorios y bases de datos nacionales e internacionales bajo este protocolo; por tanto, la remisión de un trabajo para ser publicado en la revista presupone la aceptación explícita por parte del autor/a de este método de distribución.
Se anima a las/os autoras/es a reproducir y alojar sus trabajos publicados en CyTET en repositorios institucionales, páginas web, etc. con la intención de contribuir a la mejora de la transferencia del conocimiento y de la citación de dichos trabajos.
Enlace a CyTET en Linkedin
Hashtag en Twitter: #RevistaCyTET