Gender, class and emancipation: A feminist reading of Erik Olin Wright’s work
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22325/fes/res.2021.41Keywords:
Class, gender, intersectionality, real utopias, Erik WrightAbstract
Erik O. Wright's work can be interpreted as an attempt to renovate sociological Marxism, a tradition that has maintained an ‘unhappy marriage’ with feminism, to use Hartmann’s well-known expression. This paper aims to examine Wright's work from a feminist perspective. In particular, it discusses Wright's theoretical reflection on two problems: on the one hand, the intersection of class and gender in contemporary capitalism; and, on the other, the route to women’s emancipation, paying special attention to his idea of a genderlessness society and to the potential effects of ‘real utopias’ such as equal non-transferrable parental leaves. The aim of the article is not only to review Wright's work from a feminist perspective, but to explore the ways through which his contribution connects with dilemmas and debates of contemporary feminism.
References
Acker, J. (1973). Women and Social Stratification: A Case of Intellectual Sexism. American Journal of Sociology, 78(4), 936-945.
Ackerman, B. A., Alstott, A. y Van Parijs, P. (2006). Redesigning distribution: Basic income and stakeholder grants as alternative cornerstones for a more egalitarian capitalism. Londres: Verso.
Albright, K. (2008). In Families or as Individuals? Theoretical and Methodological Problems in the Incorporation of Women in Class Analysis. Sociology Compass, 2(5), 1672-1689. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9020.2008.00156.x
Baxter, J. y Wright, E. O. (2000). The Glass Ceiling Hypothesis: A Comparative Study of the United States, Sweden, and Australia. Gender & Society, 14(2), 275-294. https://doi.org/10.1177/089124300014002004
Bowles, S. y Gintis, H. (1998). Recasting egalitarianism: New rules for communities, states, and markets. Londres: Verso.
Brighouse, H. y Wright, E. O. (2009). Strong Gender Egalitarianism. En J. C. Gornick y M. Meyers (eds.), Gender equality: Transforming family divisions of labor (pp. 79-92). Londres: Verso.
Burawoy, M. (2020). A Tale of Two Marxisms. New Left Review, 121, 66-98.
Caínzos, M. (2020). Desigualdad persistente, pero no un techo de cristal. Sobre género y autoridad en el trabajo. Trabajo presentado en Jornadas en Homenaje a Erik Olin Wright, Madrid.
Campillo, I. y Sola, J. (2020). La teoría de los recursos de poder: una revisión crítica. Revista Española de Investigaciones Sociológicas, 170, 19-34. http://dx.doi.org/10.5477/cis/reis.170.19
Cohen, J. y Rogers, J. (1995). Associations and democracy. Londres: Verso.
Delphy, C. (1984). Close to Home: A Materialist Analysis of Women's Oppression. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.
Folbre, N. (2009). Reforming Care. En J. C. Gornick y M. Meyers (eds.), Gender equality: Transforming family divisions of labor (pp. 111-128). Londres: Verso.
Fraser, N. (2013). Fortunes of Feminism. From State-Managed Capitalism to Neoliberal Crisis. Londres: Verso.
Fung, A. y Wright, E. O. (2003). Deepening Democracy: Institutional Innovations in Empowered Participatory Governance. Londres: Verso.
Gastil, J. y Wright, E. O. (2019). Legislature by Lot. Transformative Designs for Deliberative Governance. Londres: Verso.
Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice. Psychological Theory and Women's Development. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Goldthorpe, J. H. (1983). Women and Class Analysis: In Defense of the Conventional View. Sociology, 17(4), 465-488. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038583017004001
Goldthorpe, J. H. (1984). Women and Class Analysis: A Reply to the Replies. Sociology, 18(4), 491-499. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038584018004002
Gornick, J. C. y Meyers, M. (2009). Gender equality: transforming family divisions of labor. Londres: Verso.
Hartmann, H. I. (1979). The Unhappy Marriage of Marxism and Feminism: Towards a more Progressive Union. Capital & Class, 3(2), 1-33.
Haslanger, S. (2012). Resisting Reality: Social Construction and Social Critique. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Heath, A. y Britten, N. (1984). Women’s Jobs do Make a Difference: A Reply to Goldthorpe. Sociology, 18(4), 475-490.
Hernando, A. (2012). La fantasía de la individualidad: sobre la construcción sociohistórica del sujeto moderno. Buenos Aires: Katz.
Hochschild, A. (2009). La mercantilización de la vida íntima. Apuntes de la casa y el trabajo. Buenos Aires: Katz.
Huber, E. y Stephens, J. (2000). Partisan Governance, Women's Employment, and the Social Democratic Service State. American Sociological Review, 65(3), 323-342. https://doi.org/10.2307/2657460
Krippner, G. (2019). Comment on Michael Burawoy’s “Erik Olin Wright: A Tale of Two Marxisms”. Trabajo presentado en Erik Olin Wright Festschrift, Madison.
McCall, L. (2005). The Complexity of Intersectionality. Signs, 30(3), 1771-1800.
Nussbaum, M. (8 de octubre de 1992). Justice for Women! The New York Review of Books. Recuperado de https://www.nybooks.com/articles/1992/10/08/justice-for-women/
Okin, S. M. (1991). Justice, Gender, and the Family. Nueva York: Basic Books.
Orloff, A. (2009). Should feminists aim for gender symmetry? Why a dual-earner/dual-caregiver society is not every feminist's utopia. En J. C. Gornick & M. Meyers (eds.), Gender equality: Transforming family divisions of labor (pp. 129-160). Londres: Verso.
Phoenix, A. y Pattynama, P. (2006). Intersectionality. European Journal of Women’s Studies, 13(3), 187-192. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350506806065751
Roemer, J. E. (1989). Teoría general de la explotación y de las clases. Madrid: Siglo XXI.
Roemer, J. E. (1996). Equal shares: Making market socialism work. Londres: Verso.
Sandel, M. (1984). The Procedural Republic and the Unencumbered Self. Political Theory 12(1), 81-96. http://www.jstor.org/stable/191382
Seidman, G. (2020). Class, gender and utopian community: In memory of Erik Olin Wright. Trabajo presentado en Congreso Transforming Capitalism Through Real Utopias, Coimbra (Portugal).
Shalev, M. (2009). Class Divisions among Women. En J. C. Gornick & M. Meyers (eds.), Gender equality: Transforming family divisions of labor (pp. 255-282). Londres: Verso.
Sola, J. (2020). Las utopías reales de Erik Olin Wright: ¿una reconstrucción científica del socialismo utópico? Trabajo presentado en Jornadas en Homenaje a Erik Olin Wright, Madrid.
Stanworth, M. (1984). Women and Class Analysis: A Reply to John Goldthorpe. Sociology, 18(2), 159-170. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038584018002001
Weldon, S. (2006). The Structure of Intersectionality: A Comparative Politics of Gender. Politics & Gender, 2(2), 235-248. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X06231040
Wright, E. O. (1979). Class Structure and Income Determination. Nueva York: Academic Press
Wright, E. O. (1983). Clase, crisis y Estado. Madrid: Siglo XXI.
Wright, E. O. (1987). Rethinking, Once Again, the Concept of Class Structure. En E. O. Wright, U. Becker, J. Brenner, M. Burawoy, V. Burris, G. Carchedi…, P. Van Parijs, The Debate on Classes (pp. 260-347). Londres: Verso.
Wright, E. O. (1989). Women in the Class Structure. Politics & Society, 17(1), 35-66. https://doi.org/10.1177/003232928901700102
Wright, E. O. (1993). Explanation and Emancipation in Marxism and Feminism. Sociological Theory, 11(1), 39-54.
Wright, E. O. (1994a). Clases. Madrid: Siglo XXI.
Wright, E. O. (1994b). Interrogating Inequality: Essays on Class Analysis, Socialism and Marxism. Londres: Verso.
Wright, E. O. (2000). Class counts: Comparative studies in class analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wright, E. O. (2005). Approaches to Class Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wright, E. O. (2011). In defense of genderlessness. En A. Gosseries & P. Vanderborght (eds.), Arguing about justice (pp. 403-413). Lovaina: Presses universitaires de Louvain.
Wright, E. O. (2014). Construyendo utopías reales. Madrid: Akal.
Wright, E. O. (2015). Understanding class. Londres: Verso.
Wright, E. O. (2019). How to be an anticapitalist in the twenty-first century. Londres: Verso.
Wright, E. O. (2020). Christmas-January 12th [en línea]. Recuperado de https://www.caringbridge.org/visit/erikolinwright/journal
Wright, E. O., Baxter, J. y Bikelund, G. E. (1995). The gender gap in workplace authority: A cross-national study. American Sociological Review, 60 (3), 407-35. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2096422?seq=1
Wright, E. O. y Baxter, J. (2000). The Glass Ceiling Hypothesis: A Reply to Critics. Gender & Society, 14(6), 814-821. https://doi.org/10.1177/089124300014006008
Wright, E. O. y Rogers, J. (2011). American society: How it really works. New York: W. W. Norton & Company..
Wright, E. O., Shire, K., Hwang, S.-L., Dolan, M. y Baxter, J. (1992). The non-effects of class on the gender division of labor in the home: A Comparative Study of Sweden and the United States. Gender & Society, 6(2), 252-282.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Revista Española de Sociología
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
• The transfer of the copyright of the article to Revista Española de Sociología.
• The assignment to the Revista Española de Sociología of the rights of commercial exploitation of the article to third parties both in the offset and digital formats, as well as to the search engines and platforms that may serve as intermediaries for the sale or knowledge of the article.
