The role of collaborative research centres in innovation systems: structural innovations for knowledge production
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22325/fes/res.2019.29Keywords:
knowledge transfer, national innovation system, public-private collaboration, structural holes, university-firmsAbstract
This paper concerns the diversity of actions and policies labelled as “structural innovation” in national systems of innovation and, specifically, to the changing modes of interactions between the public science and the private industry sectors. The study focuses on the emergence and diffusion of organisations encompassing a more stable and formalised environment for science-firms collaboration and knowledge transfer, like Collaborative Research Centres (CRCs). The aim is to understand how CRCs generate structural transformations within innovation systems. Employing survey data about a sample of 128 CRCs settled in Spain, activities and outcomes of the centres are analysed. Findings show that the centres tend to specialise on applied research activities, playing a role of producers of scientific and technical knowledge, instead of knowledge brokers. Therefore, and at least with reference to the case of Spain, this type of structural innovations is likely to cover a “functional hole” between diverse domains of activity, instead of covering a “structural hole” between different sectors.
References
Arnold, E., Clark, J., Jávorka, Z. (2010). Impacts of European RTOs: A Study of Social and Economic Impacts of Research and Technology Organisations. Brighton: Technopolis Group.
Arnold, E., Deuten, J., van Giessel, J. F. (2004). An international review of Competence Centre Pro- grammes. Brighton: Technopolis Group.
Baba, M. (1988). Innovation in university-industry linkages: university organizations and environ- mental change. Human Organization, 47(3), 260-269.
Boardman, C., Gray, D. (2010). The new science and engineering management: cooperative re- search centers as government policies, industry strategies, and organizations. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 35(5), 445-459.
Boardman, C., Gray, D., Rivers, D. (2013). Cooperative Research Centers and Technical Inno- vation: Government Policies, Industry Strategies, and Organizational Dynamics. New York: Springer.
Bozeman, B., Dietz, J. S. (2001). Strategic research partnerships: Constructing policy-relevant in- dicators. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 26(4), 385-393.
Burt, R. S. (2015). Huecos estructurales: la estructura social de la competitividad. Madrid: CIS- Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas.
Clark, J. (2010). Coordinating a conscious geography: the role of research centers in multi-scalar innovation policy and economic development in the US and Canada. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 35(5), 460-474.
Colyvas, J. A., Powell, W. W. (2006). Roads to institutionalization: The remaking of boundaries between public and private science. Research in Organizational Behavior, 27, 305-353.
COTEC (2017). Percepción social de la innovación en España (en línea). http://informecotec.es/ percepcion-innovacion-sociedad-espana, ac- ceso: 24 de agosto de 2017.
Coursey, D. H., Bozeman, B. L. (1989). A typology of industry-government laboratory cooperative research: implications for government laboratory policies and competitiveness. En A. N. Link,
G. Tassey (eds.), Cooperative Research and Development: The Industry - University - Gov- ernment Relationship (pp. 3-20). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.
CREST (2009). Industry led competence centres. Aligning academic/public research with en- terprise and industry needs (en línea). http:// ec.europa.eu/invest-in-research/pdf/down- load_en/illc.pdf, acceso: 24 de agosto de 2017.
Dodgson, M., Hughes, A., Foster, J., Metcalfe, S. (2011). Systems thinking, market failure, and the development of innovation policy: The case of Australia. Research Policy, 40, 1145-1156.
Etzkowitz, H. (2010). The triple helix: university- industry-government innovation in action. New York: Routledge.
Etzkowitz, H., Kemelgor, C. (1998). The role of re- search centres in the collectivisation of aca- demic science. Minerva, 36(3), 271-288.
EUROSTAT (2005). Manual de Oslo. Guía para la recogida e interpretación de datos sobre inno- vación. Comunidad Europea: Tragsa.
Fernández Esquinas, M. (2012). Hacia un programa de investigación en sociología de la innovación. Arbor, 188(753), 5-18.
Fernández-Esquinas, M., Ramos-Vielba, I. (2011). Emerging forms of cross-sector collaboration in the Spanish innovation system. Science and Public Policy, 38(2), 135-146.
Fernández-Zubieta, A., Andújar-Nagore, I., Gia- chi, S., Fernández-Esquinas, M. (2016). New Organizational Arrangements for Public-Private Research Collaboration. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 7(1), 80-103.
Flanagan, K., Uyarra, E. (2016). Four dangers in in- novation policy studies-and how to avoid them. Industry and Innovation, 23(2), 177-188.
Garrett-Jones, S. (2007). Knowledge and cooperation for regional development: the effect of pro- vincial and federal policy initiatives in Canada and Australia. Prometheus, 25(1), 31-50.
Garrett-Jones, S., Turpin, T., Diment, K. (2013). Careers and organisational objectives: managing competing interests in cooperative research centres. En C. Boardman, D. Gray, D. Rivers (eds.), Cooperative Research Centers and Technical Innovation: Government Policies, Indus- try Strategies, and Organizational Dynamics (pp. 79-110). New York: Springer.
Giachi, S. (2016). Organizational Innovations in the Public Science Sector: An International Com- parison of Cooperative Research Programs. European Public & Social Innovation Review, 1(2), 73-82.
Giachi, S. (2017). La evolución de la gobernanza de las políticas de innovación en España: el caso de la colaboración entre ciencia e industria. Po- lítica y Gobernanza. Revista de Investigaciones y Análisis Político, 1, 109-132.
Gray, D. O. (2011). Cross-sector research collabora- tion in the USA: a national innovation system perspective. Science and Public Policy, 38(2), 123-133.
Gray, D. O., Boardman, C., Rivers, D. (2013). The new science and engineering management: cooperative research centers as intermediary organizations dor government policies and industry strategies. En C. Boardman, D. Gray,
D. Rivers (eds.), Cooperative Research Centers and Technical Innovation: Government Policies, Industry Strategies, and Organizational Dynamics (pp. 3-33). New York: Springer.
Henderson, R. M., Clark, K. B. (1990). Architectural in- novation: The reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 9-30.
Howells, J., Edler, J. (2011). Structural innovations: towards a unified perspective? Science and Public Policy, 38(2), 157-167.
Innobarometer (2005), Population Innovation Readiness (en línea). http://ec.europa.eu/ public_opinion/archives/ebs/ebs_236_en.pdf, acceso: 24 de agosto de 2017.
Jacob, M., Hellström, T., Adler, N., Norrgren, F. (2000). From sponsorship to partnership in academy-industry relations. R&D Management, 30(3), 255-262.
Joly, P. B., Mangematin, V. (1996). Profile of public laboratories, industrial partnerships and or- ganisation of R & D: the dynamics of industrial relationships in a large research organisation. Research Policy, 25(6), 901-922.
Karamanos, A. G. (2012). Leveraging micro- and macro-structures of embeddedness in alliance networks for exploratory innovation in biotechnology. R&D Management, 42(1), 71-89.
Lal, B., Boardman, C. (2013). International practice in cooperative research centers programs: Summary of an exploratory study of engineering-focused cooperative research centers worldwide. En C. Boardman, D. Gray, D. Rivers (eds.), Cooperative Research Centers and Technical Innovation: Government Policies, Indus- try Strategies, and Organizational Dynamics (pp. 293-307). New York: Springer.
Larédo, P., Mustar, P. (2000). Laboratory activity profiles: An exploratory approach. Scientome- trics, 47(3), 515-539.
Luukkonen, T., Nedeva, M., Barré, R. (2006). Under- standing the dynamics of networks of excellence. Science and Public Policy, 33(4), 239-252.
Menéndez Viso, A. (2016). The hidden sociality of innovation. En J. Castro Spila, J. Echeverría,
A. Unceta (eds.), Hidden Innovation: Concepts, Sectors and Case Studies (pp. 119-129). Do- nostia: SINNERGIAK Social innovation.
Merchán Hernández, C. (2012). Las relaciones de las empresas con las universidades: estrategias y dinámicas del proceso de cooperación a nivel regional. Arbor: Ciencia, Pensamiento y Cultura, 188(753), 193-209.
Merchán-Hernández, C., Valmaseda-Andia, O., Fernández-Esquinas, M. (2015). The challenges of connecting science-industry in peripheral regions: researchers’ attitudes and organizational and institutional features as determinants. European Planning Studies, 23(12), 2600-2620.
Perkmann, M., Tartari, V., McKelvey, M., et al. (2013): Academic engagement and com- mercialisation: A review of the literature on university-industry relations. Research Policy, 42, 423-442.
Perkmann, M., Walsh, K. (2007). University-industry relationships and open innovation: Towards a research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 9(4), 259-280.
Ponomariov, B., Boardman, C. (2012). Organizational Behavior and Human Resources Management for Public to Private Knowledge Trans- fer. Paris: OECD Publishing.
Rossi, F. (2010). The governance of university-industry knowledge transfer. European Journal of Innovation Management, 13(2), 155-171.
Sanz-Menéndez, L., Cruz-Castro, E. (2005). Ex- plaining the science and technology policies of regional governments. Regional Studies, 39(7), 939-954.
Slatyer, R. O. (1994). Cooperative research centres: The concept and its implementation. Higher Education, 28(1), 147-158.
Trigilia, C. (2007). La costruzione sociale dell’innovazione: economia, società e territorio. Floren- cia: Firenze University Press.
Turpin, T., Fernández-Esquinas, M. (2011). Intro- duction to special issue: The policy rationale for cross-sector research collaboration and contemporary consequences. Science and Public Policy, 38(2), 82-86.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
• The transfer of the copyright of the article to Revista Española de Sociología.
• The assignment to the Revista Española de Sociología of the rights of commercial exploitation of the article to third parties both in the offset and digital formats, as well as to the search engines and platforms that may serve as intermediaries for the sale or knowledge of the article.