Is Precariousness Equal for all Temporary Workers? Differences and Similarities between Social Classes
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22325/fes/res.2017.11Keywords:
flexibility, non-standard work, labour transitions, permanent contract, unemploymentAbstract
The article places itself in the debate about whether non-standard paid work has spread to all the social classes in an equal fashion or if, on the contrary, professionals, managers and high-grade technicians have not found themselves subject in equal measure to the typical employment relations of manual workers. In order to seek into this issue, we analyze the likelihood of moving from a fixed-term contract to 1) a permanent contract, 2) unemployment, 3) inactivity, 4) being an employer or self-employed, or 5) continuing on a fixed-term contract. The data come from the Spanish Labour Force Survey between 2010 and 2013. The results indicate that there are some significant differences between the social classes and that, as such, temporary work is not equal for everybody. In particular, the risk of becoming unemployed is higher for those who work at the bottom of the structural ladder.Downloads
Published
2017-05-01
How to Cite
Muñoz-Comet, J., & Martínez-Pastor, J.-I. (2017). Is Precariousness Equal for all Temporary Workers? Differences and Similarities between Social Classes. Spanish Journal of Sociology, 26(2). https://doi.org/10.22325/fes/res.2017.11
Issue
Section
Articles
License
In the event that your manuscript is accepted for publication in Revista Española de Sociología, it will be understood that the authors access to:
• The transfer of the copyright of the article to Revista Española de Sociología.
• The assignment to the Revista Española de Sociología of the rights of commercial exploitation of the article to third parties both in the offset and digital formats, as well as to the search engines and platforms that may serve as intermediaries for the sale or knowledge of the article.