La perspectiva tecnosocial feminista como antídoto para la misoginia online
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22325/fes/res.2021.64Palabras clave:
misoginia online, disposiciones tecnosexuales, realidades híbridas, violencia sexual y de género online, discriminación contra las mujeresResumen
Este artículo revisa las principales aportaciones de la perspectiva tecnosocial feminista frente a la violencia sexual y de género en entornos digitales (a lo que denominamos “misoginia online”). Para ello se realiza una revisión de las contribuciones producidas en el ámbito de las ciencias sociales, referidas a la misoginia onlineoccidental, principalmente las publicadas en lengua inglesa y española,con el fin de ofrecer una panorámica de las posturas actuales y sus estudios más representativos. Además, ponemos especial atención en el modo que la perspectiva tecnosocial feminista y su concepto de “disposición tecnosexual” (affordance tecnosexual) encuentran correspondencia con el análisis crítico de los entornos digitales. Ilustramos esta relación con ejemplos que muestran cómo el diseño de estos entornos puede predisponer a reificar determinadas relaciones de género y poder, entendidascomo parte de un contexto más amplio de discriminación estructural y sistemática contra las mujeres.
Citas
Alldred, P. y Biglia, B. (2015). Gender-Related Violence and Young People: An Overview of Italian, Irish, Spanish, UK and EU Legislation. Children & Society, 29(6), 662-675.
Allen, A. L. (1988). Uneasy Access: Privacy for women in a free society. Totowa: Rowman & Littlefield.
Allen, A. L. (1999). Gender and privacy in cyberspace. Stanford Law Review, 52, 1175-1200.
Balka, E. (1992). Womantalk Goes On-Line: The Use of Computer Networks in the Context of Feminist Social Change, unpublished Ph.D dissertation, Simon Fraser University (en línea). https://www.google.com/search?client=safari&rls=en&q=%EF%80%AD+Balka,+E.+(1992).+Womantalk+Goes+On-Line:+The+Use+of+Computer+Networks+in+the+Context+of+Feminist+Social+Change,+unpublished+Ph.D+dissertation&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8
Balka, E. (1993). Women's Access to On-Line Discussions about Feminism. Electronic Journal of Communication, 3(1), Disponible e-mail: comserve@vm.its.rpi.edu.
Balsamo, A. (2000). Teaching in the belly of the beast: feminism in the best of all places. En K. Sawchuk, J. Marcessault (Eds.), Wild science: feminist cultural studies of science, technology and medicine (pp. 185–214). New York: Routledge.
Banet-Weiser, S. y M. Miltner, K. M. (2016). #MasculinitySoFragile: culture, structure, and networked misogyny. Feminist Media Studies, 16(1), 171-174. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2016.1120490
Benston, M. L. (1983). For Women the Chips Are Down'. En J. Zimmerman (Ed.), The Tecnological Woman: Interfacing With Tomorrow (pp. 44-54). New York: Praeger.
Benston, M. L. (1988). 'Women's Voices/Men's Voices: Technology as Language'. En C. Kramarae (Ed.), Technology and Women's Voices: Keeping in Touch (pp.15-28), London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Bernard, E. (1982). The Long Distance Feeling: A History of the Telecommunications Workers Union. Vancouver: New Star Books.
Bernard, E. (1983). Technological Impact: The Hidden Bias in Machine Design. Proceedings of the First National Conference for Women in Science and Technology. Vancouver: SWIST.
Biglia, B., y Cagliero, S. (2019). Abordajes y ‘respuestas’ de las universidades catalanas frente a las violencias LGTBIQ+ fóbicas. Quaderns de psicologia. International journal of psychology, 21(2), e1532-e1532.
Bonet-Martí, J. (en prensa). Los antifeminismos como contramovimiento social: perspectivas teóricas y debates actuales. Teknokultura. Revista de Cultura Digital y Movimientos Sociales, 18 (1).
Bucher, T. (2012). Want to be on top? Algorithmic power and the threat of invisibility on Facebook. New Media & Society, 14, 1164–1180. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1461444812440159
Burgess, J., Matamoros-Fernández, A. (2016). Mapping Sociocultural Controversies across Digital Media Platforms: One Week of #gamergate on Twitter, YouTube, and Tumblr. Communication Research and Practice, 2(1), 79–96. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/22041451.2016.1155338
Bush, C.G. (1983). Women and the Assessment of Technology: To Think, to Be, to Unthink, to Free. En J. Rothschild (Ed.), Machina Ex Dea: Feminist Perspective on Technology (pp. 151-170), New York: Pergamon.
Calala Fondo de Mujeres (2020). Las violencias machistas en línea hacia activistas. Datos para entender el fenómeno. Barcelona: Calala Fondo de Mujeres.
Cerva, D. (2020). Activismo feminista en las universidades mexicanas: la impronta política de las colectivas de estudiantes ante la violencia contra las mujeres. Revista de la educación superior, 49(194), 137-157. https://doi.org/10.36857/resu.2020.194.1128
Chess, S., Shaw, A. (2015). A conspiracy of fishes, or, how we learned to stop worrying about# GamerGate and embrace hegemonic masculinity. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 59(1), 208-220. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2014.999917
Citron, D. K. (2009). Law’s expressive value in combating cyber gender harassment. Michigan Law Review, 108(3), 373–415.
Citron, D. K. (2014). Hate Crimes in Cyberspace. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
Cooley, M. (1980). Architect or Bee? Boston: South End Press.
Dragiewicz, M., Burgess, J., Matamoros-Fernández, A., Salter, M., Suzor, N. P., Woodlock, D., Harris, B. (2018). Technology facilitated coercive control: domestic violence and the competing roles of digital media platforms. Feminist Media Studies, 18(4), 609-625. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2018.1447341
Ellul, J. (1954). La technique ou l'enjeu du siècle. Paris: Armand Colin.
European Women’s Lobby (2017). #HerNetHerRights. Mapping the state of online violence against women and girls in Europe. Bélgica: European Comission. (en línea). https://www.womenlobby.org/IMG/pdf/hernetherrights_resource_pack_2017_web_version.pdf
Figueroa-Sarriera, H. (2017) Imaginarios de sujeto en la era digital: post (identidades) contemporáneas. Quito, Ecuador: Ediciones CIESPAL.
Filipovic, J. (2007). Blogging While Female: How Internet Misogyny parallels "Real-World" Harassment. Yale Journal of Law and Feminism, 19(1), 295-303.
Fox, N. J. y Aldred, P. (2018). The materiality of Memory: affects, Remembering and foof decisions. Cultural Sociology, 13(1), 20-36. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1749975518764864
Agencia de los Derechos Fundamentales de la Unión Europea (2014). Violencia de género contra las mujeres: una encuesta a escala de la UE. Bélgica: Agencia de los Derechos Fundamentales de la Unión Europea. (en línea). https://fra.europa.eu/sites/default/files/fra-2014-vaw-survey-at-a-glance-oct14_es.pdf
Gehl, R. (2014). Power/freedom on the dark web: A digital ethnography of the Dark web Social Network. New Media & Society, 18(7), 1219-1235.
Gigerenzer, G. (1991). From tools to theories: A heuristic of discovery in cognitive psychology. Psychological Review, 98, 254-267.
Gigerenzer, G. (2001). Digital computer: Impact on the social sciences. En N. J. Smelser y P. B. Baltes (Eds.), International encyclopedia of the social and behavioral sciences (Vol. 6, pp. 3684-3688). Amsterdam: Elsevier. Gillespie, T. (2010). The politics of “platforms”. New Media & Society, 12(3), 347-364.
Gillespie, T. (2017). Governance of and by platforms. SAGE Handbook of Social Media, 254- 278. (en línea). http://culturedigitally.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/GillespieGovernance-ofby-Platforms-PREPRINT.pdf
Ging, D. (2017). Alphas, Betas, and Incels: Theorizing the Masculinities of the Manosphere. Men and Masculinities, 10. (en línea). https://doi.org/10.1177/1097184X17706401.
Ging, D., Siapera, E. (2018). Special issue on online misogyny. Feminist Media Studies, 18(4), 515-524.
Gómez Gabriel, N. (2020). Primitivismo digital. Tinder y la cosmología neoliberal en la captura del amor romántico. Teknokultura. Revista De Cultura Digital y Movimientos Sociales, 17(2), 169-177. https://doi.org/10.5209/tekn.68542
González Pérez, G. (2019). Escraches en redes feministas universitarias: una estrategia contra la violencia de género hacia las mujeres. Comunicación y Medios, 40, 170-182. http://dx.doi.org/10.5354/0719-1529.2019.53974
Gordo, A. Rivera, J., Díaz-Catalán, C., García, A. (2019). Jóvenes en la encrucijada digital. Itinerarios de socialización y desigualdad en los entornos digitales. Madrid: Ediciones Morata.
Gray, C. H. (1996). Technohistory: Using the History of American Technology in Interdisciplinary Research. Malabar-Florida: Krieger.
Gray, C. H., Figueroa-Sarriera, H., y Mentor, S. (Eds.). (2020). Modified: Living as a Cyborg. Nueva York/Londres: Routledge.
Hackworth, L. (2018). Limitations of “Just Gender”: The Need for an Intersectional Reframing of Online Harassment Discourse and Research. En J. R. Vickery, T. Everbach (Ed.), Mediating Misogyny: Gender, Technology, and Harassment (pp. 50-70). London, UK: Palgrave
Macmillan. Haraway, D. (1991). A Cyborg Manifesto: Science, Technology, and Socialist-Feminism in the Late Twentieth Century. En D. Haraway, Simians, Cyborgs and Women: The Reinvention of Nature (pp.149-181). New York: Routledge.
Hardaker, C. (2010). Trolling in asynchronous computer-mediated communication: From user discussions to theoretical concepts. Journal of Politeness Research, 6(2), 215–242.
Hardaker, C. & McGlashan, M. (2015). “Real men don't hate women": Twitter rape threats and group identity. Journal of Pragmatics, 91, 80-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2015.11.005
Hayles, K. (1999). Toward embodied virtuality. En K. Hayles (Ed.), How we became posthuman: Virtual bodies in cybernetics, literature, and informatics: Chapter 1 (pp. 1-24). Chicago: University of Chicago.
Hess, A., Flores, C. (2016). Simply more than swiping left: A critical analysis oftoxic masculine performances on Tinder Nightmares. New media & Society, 20(3), 1085-1102. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1461444816681540
Hine, C. (2008). Virtual ethnography: modes, varieties, affordances. En N. G. Fielding, R. Lee, G. Blank (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of online research methods (pp. 257-270). Londres: Sage.
Human Rights Council (2018). Report of the Special Rapporteur on violence against women, its causes and consequences on online violence against women and girls from a human rights perspective (en línea). https://www.ohchr.org/en/issues/women/srwomen/pages/srwomenindex.aspx
Irwin, S.O. (2016). Digital Media: Human–Technology Connection. Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield.
Jane, E. (2012). Your a Ugly, Whorish, Slut. Feminist Media Studies, 14(4), 531-546. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2012.741073
Jane, E. A. (2014a). “Back to the kitchen, cunt”: speaking the unspeakable about online misogyny. Continuum: Journal of Media & Cultural Studies, 28(4), 558–570.
Jane, E. A. (2014b). “Your a ugly, whorish, slut”: Understanding E-bile. Feminist Media Studies, 14(4), 531-546.
Jane, E. A. (2016). Online misogyny and feminist digilantism. Continuum: Journal of Media & Cultural Studies, 30(3), 284-297. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10304312.2016.1166560
Jane, E. A. (2017). Feminist Digilante Responses to a Slut-Shaming on Facebook. Social Media + Society, 3(2), 1-10. (en línea). https://doi.org/10.1177%2F2056305117705996
Jenkins, H. (2006). Convergence Culture: Where Old and New Media Collide. New York: New York University Press.
Jenkins H., Ford, S., and Green, J. (2013). Spreadable Media: Creating Value and Meaning in a Networked Culture. New York: New York University Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262036016.003.0012
Jenson, J. y Castell, S. (2013). Tipping Points Marginality, Misogyny and Videogames. JCT: Journal of Curriculum Theorizing, 29(2), 72-85.
Karpf, A. (1987). Recent Feminist Approaches to Women and Technology. Radical Science Journal, 19, 158-170.
Kramarae, C. (1988). Tecnology and Women's Voices: Keeping in Touch, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Linn, P. (1987). Gender Stereotypes, Technology Stereotypes. Radical Science Journal, 19, 127-15.
Mantilla, K. (2013). Gendertrolling: Misogyny adapts to new media. Feminist Studies, 39(2), 563–570.
Marwick, A. (2016). A new study suggests online harassment is pressuring women and minorities to self-censor. (en línea). https://qz.com/844319/a-new-study-suggestsonline-harassment-is-pressuring-women-and-minorities-to-self-censor/
Massanari, A. (2017). # Gamergate and The Fappening: How Reddit’s algorithm, governance, and culture support toxic technocultures. New Media & Society, 19(3), 329-346.
Massanari, A. L., Chess, S. (2018). Attack of the 50-foot social justice warrior: The discursive construction of SJW memes as the monstrous feminine. Feminist Media Studies, 18(4), 525-542.
McCall, L. (2005). The complexity of intersectionality. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 30(3), 1771–1800.
Ministerio de Igualdad (2019). Macroencuesta de violencia contra la mujer 2019. Madrid: Delegación del Gobierno contra la Violencia de la Mujer. (en línea). https://violenciagenero.igualdad.gob.es/violenciaEnCifras/macroencuesta2015/pdf/Macroencuesta_2019_estudio_investigacion.pdf
Mumford, L. (2010). Technics and civilization. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Nagle, A. (2018). Muerte a los normies. Barcelona: Orciny Press.
Noble, D. F. (1984). Forces of Production: A Social History of Industrial Automation, New York: Knopf.
Noble, D. F. (1999). La Religión de la Tecnología. La divinidad del hombre y el espíritu de invención. Barcelona: Paidós.
Noble, S.U. (2013). Google Search: Hyper-Visibility as a Means of Rendering Black Women and Girls Invisible. InVisible Culture: An Electronic Journal for Visual Culture, 19. http://ivc.lib.rochester.edu/google-search-hyper-visibility-as-a-means-of-rendering-blackwomen-and-girls-invisible/
O’Donell, C. (2014). On Balinese Cockfights: Deeply Extending Play. Games and culture, 9(6), 406-416. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1555412014545783
Parikka, J. (2012). What is Media Archaeology? Cambridge: Polity Press.
Penny, L. (2013). Cybersexism: Sex, gender and power on the internet. London: A&C Black.
Phillips, W. (2015). This is Why We Can’t Have Nice Things: Mapping the Relationship between Online Trolling and Mainstream Culture. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Plant, S. (1997). Zeros+Ones. Digital Women and The New Technoculture. London: Fourth Estate.
Przybylski, L. (2020). Hybrid Ethnography: Online, offline and In Between. London: Sage.
Quodling, A. (2016). Platforms Are Eating Society: Conflict and Governance in Digital Spaces. En A. McCosker, S. Vivienne, A. Johns (Eds.), Negotiating Digital Citizenship: Control, Contest and Culture (pp. 131-146).
Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers. Raman, U., Komarraju, S. A. (2018). Policing responses to crime against women: unpacking the logic of Cyberabad’s “SHE Teams”. Feminist Media Studies, 18(4), 718-733.
Ringrose, J., Harvey, L (2015). Boobs, back-off, six packs and bits: Mediated body parts, gendered reward, and sexual shame in teens' sexting images. Continuum: Journal & Cultural Studies, 29 (2), 205-217.
Sádaba, I. y Gordo, Á. (2010). Del ciborg a la realidad aumentada. Coloquio Gray - Mentor - Figueroa - Sarriera. Minerva: Revista del Círculo de Bellas Artes (13). pp. 74-76. ISSN 1886- 340X. Disponible en http://www.circulobellasartes.com/mediateca/ciborg-realidadaumentada/
Salter, A., Blodgett, B. (2016). Hypermasculinity & Dickwolves: The contentious role of women in the new gaming public. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 56(3), 401–416. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2012.705199
Schäfer, M. T. (2011). Bastard Culture! How User Participation Transforms Cultural Production. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
Serra, L. (2018). Las violencias de género en línea. Píkara Magazine. (en línea). http://lab.pikaramagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/VIOLENCIAS.pdf
Shaw, A. (2014). The Internet Is Full of Jerks, Because the World Is Full of Jerks: What Feminist Theory Teaches Us About the Internet. Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies, 11(3), 273-277.
Shaw, F. (2016). ‘‘Bitch I said hi’’: The Bye Felipe campaign and discursive activism in mobile dating apps. Social Media+Society, 2, 1–10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2056305116672889
Shepherd, T., Harvey, A., Jordan, T., Srauy, S., & Miltner, K. (2015). Histories of hating. Social Media + Society, 1(2), 347-364. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F2056305115603997
Smith, J. (1978). Something Old, Something New, Something Borrowed, Something Due: Women and Appropriate Technology. Butte, Montana: National Center for Appropriate Technology.
Smith, J. (1983). Women and Appropiate Technology: A Feminist Assessment. En J. Zimmerman (Ed.), The Technological Woman: Interfacing With Tomorrow (pp.65-70), New York: Praeger.
Smith, D. (1990). Texts, Facts, and Femininity: Exploring the Relations of Ruling. New York: Routledge.
Smith, D. (1992). 'Sociology From Women's Perspectives: A Reaffirmation. Sociological Theory, 10(1), 88-98.
Thompson, C. (2016). Skirting around the Issue: Problematizing the Representation of Upskirting in Australian Media and Political Discourses. Paper presented at Rethinking Cybercrime 2016, UCLAN, Cybercrime Research Unit, University of Central Lancashire, 28 June. (en línea). https://www.academia.edu/26509152/Skirting_Around_the_Issue_Problematizing_the_Representation_of_Upskirting_in_Australian_Media_and_Political_Discourses
Thompson, C. (2018). “I can be your Tinder nightmare”: Harassment and misogyny in the online sexual marketplace. Femininism & Psychology, 28(1), 69-89.
Thompson, C., Wood, M. A. (2018). A media archaeology of the creepshot. Feminist Media Studies, 18(4), 560-574.
Turkle, S. (1995). Life on the screen: Identity in the age of the internet. New York: Touchstone.
Turton-Turner, P (2013) Villainous avatars: the visual semiotics of misogyny and free speech in cyberspace. Forum on Public Policy : A Journal of the Oxford Round Table, 1, 1–18.
UNWomen (2015). Urgent action needed to combat online violence against women and girls. (en línea). https://www.unwomen.org/en/news/stories/2015/9/cyber-violence-reportpress-release
Van Dijck, J. (2016). La cultura de la conectividad: Una historia crítica de las redes sociales. Buenos Aires: Siglo XXI Editores.
Van Dijck, J., Poell, T., Waal, M. (2018). The platform society: Public values in a connective world. New York: Oxford University Press.
Van Zoonen, L. (2002). Gendering the Internet: Claims, controversies and cultures. European Journal of Communication, 17(5), 5-23.
Varela, J. (1997). El nacimiento de la mujer burguesa. Madrid: La Piqueta [nueva edición revisada y ampliada en Morata, 2019]. Varela, J. (2011). Mujeres con voz propia. Madrid: Morata.
Vickery, J.R., Everbach,T. (Eds.) (2018). Mediating Misogyny: Gender, Technology, and Harassment. London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
Villar, A. y Pecourt, J. (en prensa). Antifeminismo y troleo de género en Twitter. Estudio de la subcultura trol a través de #STOPfeminazis. Teknokultura. Revista de Cultura Digital y Movimientos Sociales, 18 (1).
Wajcman, J. (1991). Feminism Confronts Technology, Cambridge: Polity Press.
Wajcman, J. (2000). Reflections on Gender and Technology Studies: In What State is the Art? Social Studies of Science, 30(3), 447-464.
Winner, L. (1985). Do artifacts have politics? En D. MacKenzie et al. (Eds.), The Social Shaping of Technology (pp. 26-38). Philadelphia: Open University Press.
Wood, H. (2018). The Magaluf Girl: a public sex scandal and the digital class relations of social contagion. Feminist Media Studies, 18(4), 626-642.
Publicado
Cómo citar
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2021 Revista Española de Sociología
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial 4.0.
Todas las publicaciones de la Revista Española de Sociología se realizarán bajo una licencia abierta Creative Commons de Reconocimiento 4.0 Internacional (CC BY 4.0). Dicha licencia establece que los autores son los poseedores de los derechos de propiedad intelectual de sus trabajos, que pueden redistribuirse a cambio de un reconocimiento adecuado. Para más información de la licencia Creative Commons, consultar aquí.
Una vez aceptado un artículo para su publicación, la Revista Española de Sociología solicitará al denominado "autor para la correspondencia" la aceptación de una licencia obligatoria Creative Commons incluida en un acuerdo o contrato de publicación.
