Teachers of Substance: Subject Matter Knowledge for Teaching
Parole chiave:
subject matter knowledge, teacher education, substantive and syntactic knowledge for teaching, beliefs about subject matter.Abstract
In this paper they are put forward, in the first place, a overview of the reasons why, in the american context, teacher education must share the responsability for the transmission of subject matter knowledge to prospective teachers. They move to a discussion of the research that has been done in this area, getting into focus in your research program about “Growth of Knowledge in Teaching”. Finally, they explore four prominent dimensions of the knowledge for the teaching: subject matter knowledge, substantive knowledge, syntactic knowledge, and beliefs about subject matter.
Riferimenti bibliografici
for beginning teachers and teacher educators. Curriculum Inquiry, 18(4), 401-423.
Bassham, H. (1962). Teacher understanding and pupil efficiency in mathematics: A study of relationships. Arithmetic Teacher, 9, 383-387.
Baum, L. F. (1956). The wizard of Oz. Chicago: Reilly & Lee.
Baxter, J. (in preparation). Bryan: A case study of a beginning biology teacher (Knowledge Growth in a Profession Publication Series). Stanford, CA: Stanfort University, School of Education.
Baxter, J., Richert, A. E., & Sailor, C. (1985). Content and process in biology (Knowledge Growth in a Profession Publication Series). Stanford, CA: Stanford University, School of Education.
Begle, E. (1972). Teacher knowledge and pupil achievement in algebra (Tech. Rep. No. 9). Stanford, CA: Stanford University, School Mathematics Study Group.
Boyer, E. L. (1987). College: The undergraduate experience in America. New York: Harper & Row.
Buchmann, M. (1984). The priority of knowledge and understanding in teaching. In L. G. Katz & J. D. Raths (Eds.), Advances in teacher education (Vol. 1, pp. 29-50). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Bussis, A. M., Chittenden, F., & Amarel, M. (1976). Beyond surface curriculum. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Byrne, C. J. (1983, October). Teacher knowledge and teacher effectiveness: A literature review, theoretical analysis and discussion of research strategy. Paper presented at the 14th Annual Convention of the Northeastern Educational Research Association, Ellenville, NY.
Claderhead, J., & Miller, E. (1985, September). The integration of subject matter knowledge in student teachers'classroom practice. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the British Educational Research Association, Sheffield.
Carlsen, W. S. (1988). The effects of science teacher subjectmatter knowledge on teacher questioning and classroom discourse. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Stanford University, Standford, CA.
Carpenter, T. P., Fennema, E., Peterson, P. L., & Carey, D. A. (1998). Teachers' pedagogical content knowledge in mathematics. Journal for Researchin Mathematics Education, 19, 385-401.
Conant, J. (1963). The education of American teachers. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Dewey, J. (1983). The child and the curriculum. In. J. A. Boydston (Ed.), Jonh Dewey: The middle works, 1899-1924, Volume 2: 1902-1903 (pp. 273-91). Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
Dunkin, M. J., & Biddle, B. J. (1974). The study of teaching. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
Elbaz, F. (1983). Teacher thinking: A study of practical knowledge, New York: Nichols.
Feiman-Nemser, S. (1985a). The First year of teacher preparation: transition to pedagogical thinking (Research Series Nº 156). East Lansing: Michigan State University, Institute for Research on Teaching.
Feiman-Nemser, S. y Buchmann, M. (1985). Pitfalls of experience in teacher preparation. Teacher College Record, 87(1), 53-65.
Grossman, P.L. (1987a). Conviction -that granitic base: A case study of Martha, a beginning english teacher. Stanford, CA.: Knowledge Growth in Teaching Publications Series, Stanford University, School of Education.
Grossman, P.L. (1987b). A Passion for language: A case study of Colleen, a beginning english teacher. Stanford, CA.: Knowledge Growth in Teaching Publications Series, Stanford University, School of Education.
Grossman, P.L. (1987c). A tale of two teachers: the role of subject matter orientation in teaching. Stanford, CA.: Knowledge Growth in Teaching Publications Series, Stanford University, School of Education.
Grossman, P.L. (1988). A study in contrast: sources of pedagogical content knowledge for secondary english. UNpublished doctoral dissertation. Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
Grossman, P.L. (en prensa). What are we talking about anyhow? Subject matter knowledge of English teachers. En J. Brophy (ed.): Advances in research on teaching, vol. 2: Subject matter knowledge (pp. 245-264). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 1991.
Grossman, P.L. y Gudmundsdottir, S. (1987). Teachers and texts: An expert/novice study in English. Stanford, CA.: Knowledge Growth in Teaching Publications Series, Stanford University, School of Education.
Grossman, P.L., Reynolds, J.A., Ringstaff, C. y Sykes, G. (1985). From English major to English teacher: New approaches to and old problem. Stanford, CA.: Knowledge Growth in Teaching Publications Series, Stanford University, School of Education.
Grossman, P.L. y Rickert, A.E. (1988). Unacknowledged knowledge growth: A reexamination of the effects of teacher education, Teaching and Teacher Education, 4(1), 53-62.
Gudmundsdottir, S. (1987a). Learning to teach social studies: Case studies of Cathy and Chris (Knowledge Growth in a Profession Publication Series). Stanford, CA.: Stanford University, School of Education.
Gudmundsdottir, S. (1987b). Pedagogical content knowledge: Teachers' ways of knowing (Knowledge Growth in a Profession Publication Series). Stanford, CA.: Stanford University, School of Education.
Gudmundsdottir, S., Carey, N. y Wilson, S.M. (1985). Role of prior subject matter knowledge in learning to teach social studies (Knowledge Growth in a Profession Publication Series). Stanford, CA.: Stanford University, School of Education.
Gudmundsdottir, S. y Shulman, L.S. (1987). Pedagogical content knowledge in social studies, Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 31(2), 59-70. Edic. cast.: “Conocimiento didáctico en Ciencias Sociales",
Haertel, E.H. (1986). The valid use of student performance measures for teacher education. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 8, 45-60.
Hasweh, M.Z. (1985). An exploratory study of teacher knowledge and teaching: The effects of science teachers' knowledge of subject matter and their conceptions of learning on their teaching. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
Hasweh, M. Z. (1987). Effects of subject-matter knowledge in the teaching of biology and physics, Teaching and Teacher Education, 3(2), 109-120.
Haymore, J. (1987a). From succesful student to frustated teacher: A case study of Sharon, a beginning math teacher (Knowledge Growth in a Profession Publication Series). Stanford, CA.: Stanford University, School of Education.
Haymore, J. (1987b). Math teacher or English teacher? A case study of Scott, a beginning math teacher (Knowledge Growth in a Profession Publication Series). Stanford, CA.: Stanford University, School of Education.
Holmes Group (1986). Tomorrow's teachers: A report of the Holmes Group. East Lansing, MI: Author.
Hunkler, R.F. (1968). Achievement of sixth grade pupils in modern mathematics as related to their teachers' math preparation. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Texas A. & M. University, College Station.
Kuhn, T.S. (1970). La estructura de las revoluciones científicas. México: F.C.E. (original publicado en 1962).
Lampert, M. (1985). Mathematics learning in context: "The Voyage of the Mimi", The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 4, 157-167.
Leinhardt, G. y Smith, D.A. (1985). Expertise in mathematics instruction: subject matter knowledge, Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 247-271.
Leinhardt, G. y Greeno, J. (1985). The cognitive skill of teaching, Journal of Educational Psychology, 78, 75-95.
Marks, R. (1987). Those who appreciate: A case study of Joe, a beginning mathematics teacher (Knowledge Growth in a Profession Publication Series). Stanford, CA.: Stanford University, School of Education.
McEwan, H. (1987). Interpreting the subject domains for students: Towards a rhetorical theory of teaching. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Washington, Seatle.
McGraw, L. (1987). An Anthropologist in the clasroom: A case study of Chris, a beginning social studies teacher (Knowledge Growth in a Profession Publication Series). Stanford, CA.: Stanford University, School of Education.
Neale, D.C., Smith, D.C., Wier, E.A. (1987, abril). Teacher thinking in elementary science instruction. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Washington, DC.
Nespor, J. (1985). The role of beliefs in the practice of teaching: Final report of the Teacher Beliefs Study. (R.& D Report Nº 8024). Austin: University of Texas, Research and Development Center for Teacher Education.
Nespor, J. (1987). The role of beliefs in the practice of teaching. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 19, 317-328.
Reynolds, A., Haymore, J., Ringstaff, C. y Grossman, P. (en prensa). Teachers and curricular materials: who is driving whom?, Curriculum Perspectives, 8(1), 1988, 22-29.
Schwab, J.J. (1961). Education and the structure of the disciplines. En Westbury, I. y Wilkof, N. (Eds.): Science, curriculum, and liberal education: selected essays of Joseph L. Schwab. University of Chicago Press, 1978, 229-272.
Shulman, L.S. (1986a). Those who understand: knowledge growth in teaching, Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14.Trad. y edición española (“El saber y entender de la profesión docente”) en Estudios Públicos (Centro de Estudios Públicos, Chile), núm. 99, 2005, 195-224.
Shulman, L.S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: foundations of the new reforms, Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1-22. Edic. cast.: “Conocimiento y enseñanza: fundamentos de la nueva reforma”.
Steinberg, R., Marks, R., y Haymore, J. (1985). Teachers' knowledge and structuring of content in mathematics (Technical Report of Knowledge Growth in a Profession Research Project). Stanford, CA.: School of Education, Stanford University.
Wilson, S.M. (1988). Representations of knowledge in teaching: A case of American history. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
Wilson, S.M., Shulman, L.S. y Richert, A.E. (1987). '150 different ways' of knowing: Representations of knowledge in teaching. En J. Calderhead (Ed.), Exploring Teacher Thinking. London: Cassell, 104-124.
Wilson, S.M. y Wineburg, S.S. (1988). Peering at history through different lenses: The role of disciplinary perspectives in teaching history, Teachers College Record, 89(4), 525-539.
Wineburg, S.S. (1987). From fieldwork to classwork: A case study of Cathy, a beginning social studies teacher. (Knowledge Growth in a Profession Publication Series). Stanford, CA.: Stanford University, School of Education.
##submission.downloads##
Pubblicato
Fascicolo
Sezione
Licenza
En el momento en que una obra es aceptada para su publicación, se entiende que el autor cede a la Revista PROFESORADO (en adelante RECP) en exclusiva los derechos de reproducción, distribución y venta de su manuscrito para su explotación en todos los países del mundo en formato de revista de papel, así como en cualquier otro soporte magnético, óptico y digital.Los autores cederán también a RECP los derechos de comunicación pública para su difusión y explotación a través de Intranets, Internet y cualesquiera portales y dispositivos inalámbricos que decida el editor, mediante la puesta a disposición de los usuarios para consulta online de su contenido y su extracto, para su impresión en papel y/o para su descarga y archivo, todo ello en los términos y condiciones que consten en la web donde se halle alojada la obra. A su vez, la RECP autoriza a los autores de los trabajos publicados en la revista a que ofrezcan en sus webs personales o en cualquier repositorio de acceso abierto una copia de esos trabajos una vez publicados. Junto con esa copia ha de incluirse una mención específica de la RECP, citando el año y el número de la revista en que fue publicado el artículo o nota de investigación y añadiendo, además, el enlace a la web de la RECP.
La RECP también recomienda y permite a sus autores que licencien su obra bajo la licencia de Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-SinObraDerivada 3.0 España (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0 ES), que implica que el artículo y la nota de investigación pueda copiarse, distribuirse y comunicarse públicamente bajo la condición de que en los créditos se reconozca explícitamente al autor y la obra bajo la forma establecida por éste, sin derecho a su explotación comercial y la elaboración de obras derivadas.
