Lo que enseñan las escuelas: una historia social del currículum en los Estados Unidos desde 1950
Palabras clave:
Historia social del currículum, educación centrada en la vida, currículum centrado en las disciplinas, enseñanza de destrezas básicas, estándares educativosResumen
El propósito de este ensayo es enmarcar la historia social del currículum escolar estadounidense desde 1950, explorando la interconexión de las diferentes propuestas que se han planteado acerca de lo que se debía enseñar en las escuelas y sobre lo que realmente ocurría cuando estas escuelas intentaban poner en práctica dichas recomendaciones. Nuestro punto de partida es el movimiento de educación centrada o ajuntada a la vida y el conflicto que surgió entre sus defensores y otros grupos de reformadores curriculares que favorecían la reforma curricular centrada en las disciplinas. El ensayo resultante analiza el conflicto entre estos dos grupos de reformadores de los años cincuenta en adelante y considera su impacto en lo que se enseñaba en las escuelas. Por lo tanto consideraremos cómo se ha manifestado este conflicto a partir de los setenta y lo que nos puede decir acerca del currículum escolar contemporáneo.Citas
Alexander, W. (1950). Improving instruction in Battle Creek, 1945-49. In H. Caswell (Ed), Curriculum improvement in public school systems (pp. 105-150). New York: Teachers College 1950.
Angus, D.L. & Mirel. (1999). The failed promise of the American high school, 1890-1995. New York: Teachers College Press.
Apple, M.W. (1979). Ideology and curriculum. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul. Traducción castellana: Apple, M.(1986). Ideología y currículo. Torrejón de Ardoz: Akal.
Apple, M.W. (1993). Official knowledge: Democratic education in a conservative age. New York: Routledge. Traducción castellana: APPLE, M. (1996): El conocimiento oficial. La educación democrática en una era conservadora. Barcelona: Paidós.
Apple, M.W. (2001). Educating the “right” way: Markets, standards. God and inequality. New York: Routledge. Traducción castellana: APPLE, M.W. (2002): Educar "como Dios manda". Mercado, niveles, religión, desigualdad. Barcelona: Paidós.
Apple, M.W. (2005). Comment. In D. Ravitch (Ed.), Brookings papers on educational policy (pp. 186-197). Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.
Apple, M. W. & Beane, J.A. (Eds.) (1995). Democratic schools. Alexandria: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. Traducción castellana: Apple, M.W. y Beane, J.A. (1995). Escuelas democráticas. Madrid: Morata.
Atkin, J.M. & Black P. (2003). Inside science education reform: A history of curricular and policy changes. New York: Teachers College Press.
Ball, S. (1985). English for the English since 1906. In I. Goodson (Ed.), Social histories of the secondary curriculum: Subjects for study (pp. 53-88). London: Falmer Press.
Basler, R. (1953). Objectives of life adjustment education. In F. Zeran (Ed.), Life adjustment education in action (pp. 53-70). New York: Chartwell House.
Berliner, D.C.& Biddle, B. (1995). The manufactured crisis: Myths, fraud, and the attack on America’s public schools. Reading: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
Bestor, A. (1953/1985). Educational wastelands: The retreat from learning in our public schools (2nd ed.). Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
Brinkley, A. (1998). Liberalism and its discontents. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Bruner, J.S. (1963). The process of education. New York: Vintage Books. Traducción castellana: Bruner, J. (1972). El proceso de la educación. Mexico: Uteha.
Bruner, J.S. (1971). The process of education revisited. Phi Delta Kappan, 53, 18-21.
Buras, K.L. (1999). Questioning core assumptions: A critical reading of and response to E.D. Hirsch’s The schools we need and why we don’t have them. Harvard Educational Review, 69, 67-93.
Buras, K.L. (2005, April). Tracing the core knowledge movement: History lessons from above and below. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Quebec.
Cannato, V.J. (2001) The ungovernable city: John Lindsey and his struggle to save New York. New York: Basic Books.
College Entrance Examination Board (1977). On further examination: Report of the advisory panel on the scholastic aptitude test score decline and appendices. New York: College Entrance Examination Board. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED148834).
Conant, J.B. (1959). The American high school today: A first report to interested citizens. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.
Conant, J.B. (1967). The comprehensive high school: A second report to interested Citizens. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.
Connelly, F.M. & Clandinin, D.J. (1988). Teachers as curriculum planners: Narratives of experience. New York: Teachers College Press.
Denny, T. (1978). Some still do: River Acres, Texas. In R.E. Stake & J.A. Easley, Jr. (Eds.), Case studies in science education (Vol. 1) (pp. 1/1-1/125). Urbana-Champaign: Center for Instructional Research and Curriculum Evaluation.
Detroit Board of Education (1955). A progress report of the Detroit Public Schools since 1940: The superintendent’s annual report.
Detroit Board of Education (1958). Consultant’s report to the school program (curriclum) sub-committee of the citizens advisory committee on school needs.
Detroit Board of Education (1962). Findings and recommendations of the citizens advisory committee on equal educational opportunity (abridged).
Dickson, P. & Thomas, A. (2004). The bonus army: An American epic. New York: Walker & Company.
Dillon, S. (2005a, August 22). Connecticut sues the U.S. over mandated school testing. New York Times.
Dillon, S. (2005b, September 2). Education law is loosened for failing Chicago schools. New York Times.
Dow, P.B. (1991). Schoolhouse politics: Lessons from the Sputnik era. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Durkheim, E. (1977). The evolution of educational thought: Lectures on the formation and development of secondary education in France (Trans., Peter Collins). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul. Traducción castellana: Durkheim, E.: Historia de la educación y de las doctrinas pedagógicas: La evolución pedagógica en Francia. Madrid: La Piqueta, 1982.
Eisner, E. (1994). The educational imagination: On the design and evaluation of school programs (3rd ed.). New York: Macmillan.
Everett, S., & Wattenberg, W. (1937). Reorganization of subjects, Review of Educational Research, 7, 124-128.
Fenton, E. (1966). Teaching the new social studies in secondary schools: An inductive approach. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Fenton, E. (1967). The new social studies. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Finn, C.E. Jr. & Rebarber, T. (1992). The changing politics of educational reform. In C.E. Finn, Jr. & T. Rebarber (Eds.), Education reform in the 90’s (pp. 175-193). New York: Macmillan Company.
Franklin, B. M. (1985). The social efficiency movement and curriculum change, 1939- In I. Goodson (Ed.), Social histories of the secondary curriculum: Subjects for study (pp. 239-268). London: Falmer Press.
Franklin, B.M. (1986). Building the American community: The school curriculum and the search for social control. London: Falmer Press.
Franklin, B.M. (1999). Discourse, rationality, and educational research: A historical perspective of RER. Review of Educational Research, 69, 347-363.
Franklin, B.M. (2000). A historical perspective on teaching low-achieving children: A first account. In B.M. Franklin (Ed.), Curriculum and consequence: Herbert M. Kliebard and the promise of schooling (pp 128-152). New York: Teachers College Press.
Franklin, B.M (2004). Community, race, and curriculum in Detroit: The Northern High School walkout. History of Education, 33, 137-156.
Freeman, J. (2000). Working class New York: Life and labor since World War II. New York: The New Press.
Gibboney, R.A. (1994). The stone trumpet: A story of practical school reform, 1960-1990. Albany: Sate University of New York Press.
Gidney, R.D. (1999). From Hope to Harris: The reshaping of Ontario’s schools. Tornonto: University of Toronto Press.
Goodlad, J.I. (1964). School curriculum reform. New York: The Fund for the Advance-ment of Education.
Goodlad, J.I. (1966). The changing school curriculum. New York: The Fund for the Advancement of Education.
Goodlad, J.I. (1984). A place called school: Prospects for the future. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.
Grant, G. (1988). The world we created at Hamilton High. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Grobman, A.B. (1969). The changing classroom: The role of the Biological Sciences Curriculum Study. Garden City: Doubleday & Company.
Harnischfeger, A. & Wiley, D. (1977), The decline of achievement test scores: Evidence, causes, and consequences. Washington, D.C.: National Institute of Education. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. Ed141412).
Hess, F.M. & Finn, C.E., Jr. (2004). Introduction. In F.M. Hess & C.E. Finn, Jr. (Eds.), Leaving no child behind: Options for kids in failing schools (pp. 1-10). New York: Palgrave Macmillan
Hirsch, E.D., Jr. (1987). Cultural literacy: What every American needs to know. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Hirsch, E.D., Jr. (1996). The schools we need and why we don’t have them. New York:: Anchor Books.
Jackson, K. (1985). Crabgrass frontier: The suburbanization of the United States. New York: Oxford University Press.
Johnson, C. (2003). Bioterrorism is real-world science: Inquiry-based simulation mirrors real life. Science Scope, 27, 19-23.
Johnson, C. (2005). Making instruction relevant to language minority students at the middle level. Middle School Journal, 37, 10-14.
Jones, K. (2003). Education in Britain 1944 to the present. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Kinder, D.R. (1979). “On Further Examination” of the SAT report. Contemporary Education, 50, 173-175.
Kliebard, H.M. (1992). Constructing a history of the American curriculum. In P. Jackson (Ed.), Handbook of research on curriculum (pp. 157-184). New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.
Kliebard, H.M. (2002). Changing course: American curriculum reform in the 20th Century. New York: Teachers College Press.
Kliebard, H.M. (2004). The struggle for the American curriculum, 1893-1958 (3rd. ed.). New York: Routledge.
Krug, M.M. (1967). History and the social sciences: New approaches to the teaching of social studies. Waltham: Blaisdell Publishing Company.
Lather, P. (1991). Getting smart: Feminist research and pedagogy with/in the post-modern. New York: Routledge.
Lightfoot, S.L. (1983). The good high school: Portraits of character and culture. New York: Basic Books.
Lowe, R. (1997). Schooling and social change 1964-1990. London: Routledge.
Margolis, J. (1999). The last innocent year: America in 1964: The beginning of the “sixties. New York: William Morrow & Company.
Michigan Department of Education (2004). Design and validity of MEAP test. Retrieved June 25, 2005, from http://www.michigan.gov/printerFriendly/0,1687,7-140-22709_31168-94522--,00.html.
Michigan Nonprofit Association (1998). K-12 quality and assessment. Retrieved June 25, 2005, from http://www.michiganinbrief.org/edition06/text/issues/issue-40.htm.
Minneapolis Public Schools (1949, September). Workshop news, 12-13.
Minneapolis Public Schools (1957, March 4). Memorandum. General Files of the Minneapolis Public Schools, Minneapolis Board of Education.
Minneapolis Public Schools (1959, December 14). What is the double period? General Files of the Minneapolis Public Schools, Minneapolis Board of Education.
Mirel, Jeffrey (1993). The rise and the fall of an urban school system: Detroit, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
National Commission on Excellence in education (1983). A nation at risk: The imperative for educational reform. Washington, D.C.: GPO.
National Education Association (1977). On further examination of On further examintion. Washington, D.C.: National Education Association, (ERICDocument Reproduction Service No. ED148889).
O’Connor, A. (2001). Poverty knowledge: Social science, social policy, and the poor in twentieth-century U.S. history. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Patterson, J.T. (1996). Grand expectations: The United States, 1945-1974. New York: Oxford University Press.
Perlstein, D. (2004). Justice, Justice: School politics and the eclipse of liberalism. New York: Peter Lang.
Phenix, P. (1964). Realms of meaning. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.
Pinar, W.F. (Ed.). (1975). Curriculum theorizing: The reconceptualists. Berkeley: McCutchen Publishing Corporation.
Pinar, W. (Ed.), International handbook of curriculum research. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Pinar, W.F. & Reynolds, W.M (Eds.) (1992). Understanding curriculum as phenomenological and deconstructed text. New York: Teachers College Press.
Podair, J.E. (2002). The strike that changed New York: Blacks, whites, and the Ocean Hill-Brownsville crisis. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Popham, W.J. (1973a). Criterion-referenced instruction. Belmont: Fearon Publishers.
Popham, W.J. (1973b). The use of instructional objectives. Belmont: Fearon Publishers.
Popkewitz, T.S. (1991). A political sociology of educational reform: Power/knowledge in teaching, teacher education, and research. New York: Teachers College Press.
Popkewitz, T.S. (1998). Struggling for the soul: The politics of schooling and the construction of the teacher. New York: Teachers College Press.
Popkewitz, T.S., Tabachnick, R., & Wehlage, G. (1982). The myth of educational reform: A study of school responses to a program of change. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
Porter, M.E. (1959, October 10). Schools helping underprivileged to adjust to life. Detroit News.
Powell, A., Farrar, E., & Cohen, D. (1985). The shopping mall high school: Winners and losers in the educational marketplace. Boston: Houghton & Mifflin Company.
Ravitch, D. (1983). The troubled crusade: American education, 1945-1980. New York: Basic Books.
Ravitch, D. (2000). Left back: A century of failed school reforms. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Reese, W.J. (2005). America’s public schools: From the common school to “No Child Left Behind.” Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
Reid, W.A. (1998). Erasmus, Gates, and the end of curriculum. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 30, 499-501.
Rickover, H. (1959). Education and freedom. New York: E.P. Dutton.
Romine, S. (1950). Areas and objectives of life adjustment education. In H. Douglas (Ed.), Education for life adjustment: Its meaning and implementation (pp. 45-67). New York: The Ronald Press.
Rudolph, J.L. (2002a). From world war to Woods Hole: The use of wartime research models for curriculum reform. Teachers College Record, 104, 212-241.
Rudolph, J.L. (2002b). Scientists in the classroom: The cold war reconstruction of American science education. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Schwab, J.J. (1964). Problems, topics, and issues. In S. Elam (Ed.), Education and the structure of knowledge (pp. 4-42). Chicago: Ran McNally & Company. Traducción castellana: Schwab, J. (1973). Problemas, tópicos y puntos en discusión. En S. Elam (comp.), La educación y la estructura del conocimiento. Buenos Aires: El Ateneo, 1-38.
Sedlak, M.W., Wheeler, C.W., Pullin, D, & Cusick, P.A. (19b86). Selling students short: Classroom bargains and academic reform in the American high school. New York: Teachers College Press.
Silberman, C. (1970). Crisis in the classroom: The remaking of American education. New York: Random House.
Sirotnik, KA. (1983). What you see is what you get: Consistency, persistency, and mediocrity in the classroom. Harvard Educational Review, 53, 16-31.
Stedman, L.E., & Kaestle, C.F. (1985). The test score decline is over: Now what? Phi Delta Kappan, 67, 204-210.
Stearns, P.N. (1993). The old social history and the new. In M.K. Cayton, E.J. Gorn, & P. W. Williams (Eds.), Encyclopedia of American social history (3 vols.) (I: 237-250). New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.
Stout, M (2000). The feel good curriculum: The dumbing-down of America’s kids in the Name of self-esteem. Cambridge: Persues Books.
Tompkins, G.S. 1986). A common countenance: Stability and change in the Canadian curriculum. Scarborough: Prentice-Hall Canada, Inc.
US Department of Education (1984). The nation responds. Washington, D.C.: GPO.
US Department of Education (1990). National goals for education. Washington, D.C.: GPO.
US Department of Education (2005a). Closing the achievement gap in America’s public Schools. Retrieved August 13, 2005, from http://www.ed.gov/nclb/overview/welcome/closing-the-gap.pdf.
US Department of Education (2005b). Executive summary of the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001. Retrieved August 13, 2005, from http://www.ed.gov/print/nclb/overview/intro/execusumm.html.
US Office of Education (1948). Life adjustment education for every youth. Washington, D.C.: GPO.
Women on Words & Images (1972). Dick and Jane as victims: Sex stereotyping in Children’s readers. Princeton: Women on Words & Images.
Descargas
Publicado
Número
Sección
Licencia
En el momento en que una obra es aceptada para su publicación, se entiende que el autor cede a la Revista PROFESORADO (en adelante RECP) en exclusiva los derechos de reproducción, distribución y venta de su manuscrito para su explotación en todos los países del mundo en formato de revista de papel, así como en cualquier otro soporte magnético, óptico y digital.Los autores cederán también a RECP los derechos de comunicación pública para su difusión y explotación a través de Intranets, Internet y cualesquiera portales y dispositivos inalámbricos que decida el editor, mediante la puesta a disposición de los usuarios para consulta online de su contenido y su extracto, para su impresión en papel y/o para su descarga y archivo, todo ello en los términos y condiciones que consten en la web donde se halle alojada la obra. A su vez, la RECP autoriza a los autores de los trabajos publicados en la revista a que ofrezcan en sus webs personales o en cualquier repositorio de acceso abierto una copia de esos trabajos una vez publicados. Junto con esa copia ha de incluirse una mención específica de la RECP, citando el año y el número de la revista en que fue publicado el artículo o nota de investigación y añadiendo, además, el enlace a la web de la RECP.
La RECP también recomienda y permite a sus autores que licencien su obra bajo la licencia de Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-SinObraDerivada 3.0 España (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0 ES), que implica que el artículo y la nota de investigación pueda copiarse, distribuirse y comunicarse públicamente bajo la condición de que en los créditos se reconozca explícitamente al autor y la obra bajo la forma establecida por éste, sin derecho a su explotación comercial y la elaboración de obras derivadas.
