Leadership for improving the quality of secondary education: Some international developments

Autores/as

  • Bill Mulford University of Tasmania

Palabras clave:

Leadership, accountability, international developments, professional learning community

Resumen

Internationally, this is a “golden age” of school but it is taking place in the face of tremendous pressure for schools to be more publicly accountable. This mix of leadership and accountability has created a very new working context for both teachers and school leaders. There is a clear need to better understand the consequences of that context for the work of secondary school leaders. To help with this understanding, this paper identifies some of the international developments in that context in education and school leadership. It first focuses on work emanating from the OECD and then moves to recent developments in UK and Australia. All start at the broadest level by questioning what kind of education best serves society now and in the future. They then move to the question of how the education system is best organised in order to met the new demands, especially in terms of its governance and leadership. Three clear areas are identified from this work that involve a broadening of what counts for good schooling, governance and school leadership. A second focus on recent reviews of research on school leadership effects on student learning finds them consistent with these international and national developments, as well as suggesting directions forward for effective secondary school leadership.

Biografía del autor/a

Bill Mulford , University of Tasmania

Professor and Director of Research and Leadership for Learning Research Group, Faculty of Education , University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania and Honorary Visiting Professor, National College of School Leadership, Nottingham, UK. Bill is an internationally recognised educator with a deep interest and extensive research and publication record in the areas of educational leadership, educational change and school effectiveness and improvement. Former teacher, school principal, Assistant Director of Education, Faculty Dean, and Chair of a university Academic Senate, has high legitimacy within the profession and universities. Adviser to numerous state and national Departments of Education and a consultant to international organisations such as OECD, UNESCO and Asian

Citas

ACER. (2005). Disponible en http://www.acer.edu.au/

Berliner, D. (2005). Our impoverished view of educational reform. Teachers College Record. Disponible en http://www.terecord.org

DfES. (2005). Disponible en http://www.everychildmatters.gov.uk/aims/

Feinstein, L. (2000) The Relative Economic Importance of Academic, Psychological and Behavioural Attributes Developed in Childhood. London: Centre for Economic Performance, London School of Economics and Political Science, University of London. Disponible en http://cep.lse.ac.uk/pubs/download/dp0443.pdf

Henton, D., Melville, J. & Walesh, K. (1997). Grassroots leaders for a new economy: How civic entrepreneurs are building prosperous communities. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Kilpatrick, S., Johns, S., Mulford, B., Falk, I., and Prescott, L. (2001). More than education: Leadership for rural school-community partnerships. Canberra: Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation. Disponible en http://rirdc.gov.au/reports/HCC/02-055sum.html

Kozol, J. (2005). The shame of the nation: The restoration of apartheid schooling in America. New York: Random House.

Leadbeater, C. (2004a) Learning about personalisation: How can we put the learning at the heart of the education system? London: UK Department for Education and Skills. Disponible en www.standards.dfes.gov.uk/innovation-unit

Leadbeater, C. (2004b) Personalisation through participation. London: Demos. Disponible en www.demos.co.uk

Leadbeater, C. (2005). The shape of things to come. London: DfES Innovation Unit. Disponible en www.standards.dfes.gov.uk/innovation-unit

Leithwood, K., & Day, C. (forthcoming). (eds). Making a difference: Successful school leadership in eight countries. Boston: Springer.

Leithwood, K., & Jantzi, D. (2005). A review of transformational school leadership research. Paper presented at AERA, Montreal.

Leithwood, K., & Riehl, C. (2003) What do we already know about successful school leadership? Paper presented at AERA, Chicago.

Leithwood, K., Seashore Louis, K., Anderson, S., & Wahlstrom, K. (2004). Review of research: How leadership influences student learning. N.Y.: The Wallace Foundation. Disponible en

http://www.wallacefoundation.org/WF/KnowledgeCenter/KnowledgeTopics/EducationLeadership/Documents/HowLeadershipInfluencesStudentLearningES.htm

Lemke, M., et al. (2001). Outcomes of learning. Washington, DC: US Department of Education, National Centre for Education Statistics.

Mulford, B. (2003a), School Leaders: Changing roles and impact on teacher and school effectiveness. Commissioned paper by the Education and Training Policy Division, OECD, for the Activity “Attracting, Developing and Retaining Effective Teachers”. Paris: OECD. Disponible en http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/61/61/2635399.pdf

Mulford, B. (2003b). The role of school leadership in attracting and retaining teachers and promoting innovative schools and students. Commissioned paper by the Commonwealth Department of Education Science and Training for their “Review of Teaching and Teacher Education”. Disponible en http://www.dest.gov.au/NR/rdonlyres/161EEEC9-713A-40CD-9E87-2E5ACA1E19A3/1661/leadership.pdf

Mulford, B. (2005). Accountability policies and their effects. In N. Bascia, A. Cumming, A. Datnow, K. Leithwood, & D. Livingstone. (eds). International Handbook of Educational Policy (London: Springer). Pp. 281-294.

Mulford, B. (in press a). Overview of Research on Australian Educational Leadership 2001-2005. Australian Journal of Education.

Mulford, B. (in press b). The challenge of building social capital in professional learning communities. In L. Stoll, & K. Seashore Louis. (eds). Professional learning communities: Divergence, detail and difficulties. London: Open University Press/McGraw Hill.

NCSL, (2005a). Corporate Plan 2005-08: Summary. Disponible en http://www.ncsl.org.uk/media/9E1/EA/543_Mini_AW1.pdf

NCSL. (2005b). International perspectives on networked learning. www.ncsl.org.uk/nlc

OECD, (2001). What schools for the future? Paris: OECD. Disponible en

http://www.oecd.org/document/34/0,2340,en_2649_34859774_35413922_1_1_1_1,00.html

OECD, (2005a). Emerging Education Policy Issues in OECD Countries – Meeting of OECD Education Chief Executives. Disponible en http://www.oecd/document/10/0,2340,en_2649_33723_35378698_1_1_1_1,00.html

OECD. (2005b). Improving School Leadership: Guidelines for Country Participation. Paris: OECD Directorate of Education.

OECD. (2005c). School Factors Related to Quality and Equity: Results from PISA 2000. Paris: OECD. Disponible en http://www.pisa.oecd.org/dataoecd/15/20/34668095.pdf

OECD. (2005d). Teaches Matter: Attracting, Developing and Retaining Effective Teachers. Paris, OECD. http://www.oecd.org/document/9/0,2340,en_2649_34521_11969545_1_1_1_1,00.html

Rusch, E. (2005). Institutional barriers to organisational learning in school systems: The power of silence. Educational Administration Quarterly, 41(1), pp. 83-120.

Smith, J. (14/12/2005a). Disponible en http://www.dfes.gov.uk/pns/DisplayPN.cgi?pn_id=2005_0157

Smith, J. (13/10/2005b). Disponible en http://www.dfes.gov.uk/speeches/

Teaching Australia. (2005). Disponible en http://www.teachingaustralia.edu.au/

Tasmanian Department of Education. Disponible en http://www.education.tas.gov.au

UNESCO. (2005). Decentralisation in education: National policies and practices. Paris: UNESCO. Disponible en http://portal.unesco.org/education/en/ev.php-URL_ID=44937&URL_DO=DO_TOPIC&URL_SECTION=201.html

Waters, T., Grubb, S. (2004). The leadership we need. Aurora, COL: McRel. Disponible en http://www.mcrel.org

Wheatley, M. (2005). Finding our way: Leadership for an uncertain time. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publisher.

Descargas

Publicado

2006-04-01