ECtHR – Judgment of 31.05.2011, Khodorkovskiy c. Russia, 5829/04 – «Articles 3, 5 and 18 ECHR – Prohibition of torture or inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment – Right to liberty and security – Limitation of restrictions on rights» – Challenges ari
Keywords:
Torture, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment, right to liberty and security of person, remand in custody, arbitrary detention, due process, legal interaction, expropriation of YukosAbstract
This paper analyzes the Judgment issued on 31 May 2011 by the ECtHR in the Case of Khodorkovskiy v. Russia. The ECtHR finds a violation of Article 3 of the European Convention, since the authorities of the Russian Federation subjected the applicant to inhuman and degrading treatment during his remand in custody as well as his appearance in the hearings. Furthermore, the ECtHR affirms the violation of Articles 5.1.c), 5.3 and 5.4 of the European Convention, by recognizing certain arbitrary facts attributable to the national judicial organs when the detention and later judicial proceedings against the applicant took place. However, the ECtHR does not consider allegations that the Russian Federation had detained and prosecuted the applicant without any legal reason, in violation of Article 18 of the European Convention, sufficiently proven. Finally, this case highlights the interactions between the International Law of human rights and International Economic Law, whereas several disputes related to expropriation of Yukos are being brought before certain national and international courts.Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Downloads
How to Cite
Pascual Vives, F. J. (2015). ECtHR – Judgment of 31.05.2011, Khodorkovskiy c. Russia, 5829/04 – «Articles 3, 5 and 18 ECHR – Prohibition of torture or inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment – Right to liberty and security – Limitation of restrictions on rights» – Challenges ari. Revista De Derecho Comunitario Europeo, (40), 853–870. Retrieved from https://recyt.fecyt.es/index.php/RDCE/article/view/39487
Issue
Section
CASE LAW EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS
License
Copyright
Submission of a manuscript to the RDCE implies having read and accepted the journal's editorial guidelines and instructions for authors. When a work is accepted for publication, it is understood that the author grants the RDCE exclusive rights of reproduction, distribution and, where appropriate, sale of his manuscript for exploitation in all countries of the world in printed version, as well as any other magnetic, optical and digital media.
Authors shall transfer the publishing rights of their manuscript to RDCE so that it may be disseminated and capitalised on Intranets, the Internet and any web portals and wireless devices that the publisher may decide, by placing it at the disposal of users so that the latter may consult it online and extract content from it, print it and/or download and save it. These activities must comply with the terms and conditions outlined on the website hosting the work. However, the RDCE authorises authors of papers published in the journal to include a copy of these papers, once published, on their personal websites and/or other open access digital repositories. Copies must include a specific mention of RDCE, citing the year and issue of the journal in which the article was published, and adding a link to the RDCE website(s).
A year after its publication, the works of the RDCE will be under the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-NoDerivative 4.0 International license (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which allows third parties to share the work as long as its author and its first publication is indicated, without the right to commercial exploitation and the elaboration of derivative works.
Plagiarism and scientific fraud
The publication of work that infringes on intellectual property rights is the sole responsibility of the authors, including any conflicts that may occur regarding infringement of copyright. This includes, most importantly, conflicts related to the commission of plagiarism and/or scientific fraud.
Practices constituting scientific plagiarism are as follows:
1. Presenting the work of others as your own.
2. Adopting words or ideas from other authors without due recognition.
3. Not using quotation marks or another distinctive format to distinguish literal quotations.
4. Giving incorrect information about the true source of a citation.
5. The paraphrasing of a source without mentioning the source.
6. Excessive paraphrasing, even if the source is mentioned.
Practices constituting scientific fraud are as follows:
1. Fabrication, falsification or omission of data and plagiarism.
2. Duplicate publication.
3. Conflicts of authorship.
Warning
Any breach of these Rules shall constitute a ground for rejection of the manuscript submitted.
