The Quito, between the urban and the industrial: the factual powers in the occupied city

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37230/CyTET.2022.214.8

Keywords:

Factual powers, Simultaneous city, Occupied city, Urban-industrial

Abstract

This study analyzes how official and factual powers have acted upon urban-industrial zones in the north and south of Quito in the last decades both under the neoliberal, and under the 21st century socialism models in Ecuador. The “simultaneous city” and the “occupied city” are used as theoretical categories of analysis in order to make evident how industrial processes configure and determine dwelling and citizenship. A theoretical-conceptual, juridical-contextual route is performed, followed by an analysis in the territory the dynamics which underlie the industrial in the urban, and vice versa. This analysis showed how the factual act upon the relationships and interactions with inhabitants, in the socio-environmental conflicts, and in the quality of life, which are provoked by the incompatibility in urban land use due to the existence of clearly different interests.

References

Baringo, D. (2013): La tesis de la producción del espacio en Henri Lefebvre y sus críticos: un enfoque a tomar en consideración. Quid 16. Revista Del Área de Estudios Urbanos, 0(3), 119–135.

Borja, J. (2019): Derecho a la ciudad, de la calle a la globalización. Monografías CIDOB, 76, 33–43.

Bourdieu, P. (2012): Sobre el estado, Tlalpan, México, Editor digital Titivillus.

Carrión, F. (1982): La renovación urbana en Quito, Editorial FRAGA.

Carrión, F. (2007): Espacio público: punto de partida para la alteridad. 1–15.

https://www.flacsoandes.edu.ec/sites/default/files/agora/files/1228415744.espacio_publico._punto_de_partida_para_la_alteridad_2.pdf

Carrión, F. (2008): Violencia urbana: un asunto de ciudad. Eure, 34(103), 111–130.

Carrión, F. & Vallejo, R. (1992): La planificación de Quito. Del Plan Director a la ciudad democrática. En Ciudades y políticas urbanas en América Latina (pp. 143–170), Quito.

Castells, M. (2009): Comunicación y poder, Alianza Editorial.

Correa, R. (2012): Ecuador: de Banana Repúblic a la No República (Primera), Nomos Impresores.

Corti, H. & Borja, J. (2018): Derecho a la ciudad: Conquista política y renovación jurídica, Editorial Jusbaires.

De Mattos, C.A. (2010): Globalización y metamorfosis metropolitana en América Latina. De la ciudad a lo urbano generalizado. Revista de Geografia Norte Grande, 47, 81–104. https://doi.org/10.4067/s0718-34022010000300005

González, D. & Pérez, M. T. (2018): La ciudad simultánea: introducción al sur-globlal. ACE: Architecture, City and Environment, 13(37), 269–280. https://doi.org/10.5821/ace.13.37.5564

Gramsci, A. (2013): Antología, Ediciones Akal.

Harvey, D. (1977): Urbanismo y desigualdad social, Siglo XXI de España Editores.

Harvey, D. (1998): La condición de la posmodernidad: investigación sobre los orígenes del cambio cultural. Amorrortu Editores.

Harvey, D. (2012): Ciudades Rebeldes. Del derecho de la ciudad a la revolución urbana, Ediciones Akal.

Harvey, D. (2014): Diecisiete contradicciones y el fin del capitalismo, IAEN-Instituto de Atos Estudios Nacionales del Ecuador.

Harvey, D. (2018): Justicia, naturaleza y la geografía de la diferencia, IAEN-Instituto de Atos Estudios Nacionales del Ecuador.

Herrero-Olarte, S. (2020): Exclusión laboral por movilidad: el caso de Quito (Ecuador). Ciudad y Territorio Estudios Territoriales, 52(206). https://doi.org/10.37230/CyTET.2020.206.09

Jirón, M. P. & Lange, v. C. & Bertrand, S. M. (2010): Exclusión y Desigualdad Espacial: Retrato desde la movilidad cotidiana. Revista INVI, 25(68), 15–57. https://doi.org/10.4067/s071883582010000100002

Ley de Régimen Municipal De Ecuador (1971): Congreso Nacional de Ecuador, Registro Oficial, Sup 331 de 15 de Octubre de 1971.

Moscovici, S. (1979): El psicoanálisis, su imagen y su público, Editorial Huemul.

Ramírez, B. & López, L. (2015): Espacio, paisaje, región, territorio y lugar: la diversidad en el pensamiento contemporáneo, UNAM, Instituto de Geografía.

Resolución Nro. 0005-CTUGS-2020, Norma técnica de contenidos mínimos, procedimiento básico de aprobación y proceso de registro formal de los planes de uso y gestión de suelos y, los planes urbanísticos complementarios de los Gobiernos Autónomos Descentralizados, 40 (2020), República del Ecuador. https://www.habitatyvivienda.gob.ec/wpcontent/uploads/2020/09/resoluci%C3%B3n_nro._005_ctugs_2020_norma_t%C3%A9cnica_pugs.pdf

Smith, N. (2013): ¿Ciudades después del neoliberalismo? (pp. 9–30). https://marxismocritico.com/2013/06/17/ciudades-despues-del-neoliberalismo/

Soja, E.W. (2008): Postmetrópolis. Estudios críticos sobre las ciudades y las regiones, Madrid, Traficantes de sueños.

Torres, V.H. (1985): El Municipio administrador o poder local. Ecuador Debate, Barrios populares: realidades y problemas, 7, 57–76. Centro Andino de Acción Popular (CAAP) http://hdl.handle.net/10469/10044

Downloads

Published

2022-12-15

How to Cite

Gómez-Díaz, M. G. (2022). The Quito, between the urban and the industrial: the factual powers in the occupied city . Ciudad Y Territorio Estudios Territoriales, 54(214), 947–968. https://doi.org/10.37230/CyTET.2022.214.8

Issue

Vol. 54 No. 214 (2022): CyTET winter 2022

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2022 Mauricio Gorky Gómez Díaz

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Considering the provisions of the current legislation on Intellectual Property, and in accordance with them, all authors publishing in CyTET give -in a non-exclusive way and without time limit- to the Ministry of Transport, Mobility and Urban Agenda the rights to disseminate, reproduce, communicate and distribute in any current or future format, on paper or electronic, the original or derived version of their work under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivative 4.0 license International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), as well as to include or assign to third parties the inclusion of its content in national and international indexes, repositories and databases, with reference and recognition in any case of its authorship.

In addition, when sending the work, the author(s) declares that it is an original work in which the sources that have been used are recognized, committing to respect the scientific evidence,  to no longer modify the original data and to verify or refute its hypothesis. Author(s) also declare that the essential content of the work has not been previously published nor will it be published in any other publication while it is under evaluation by CyTET; and that it has not been simultaneously sent to another journal.

Authors must sign a Transfer of Rights Form, which will be sent to them from the CyTET Secretariat once the article is accepted for publication.

With the aim of promoting the dissemination of knowledge, CyTET joins the Open Journal Access (OA) movement and delivers all of its content to various national and international indexes, repositories and databases under this protocol; therefore, the submission of a work to be published in the journal presupposes the explicit acceptance by the author of this distribution method.

Authors are encouraged to reproduce and host their work published in CyTET in institutional repositories, web pages, etc. with the intention of contributing to the improvement of the transfer of knowledge and the citation of said works.