The shared-city: cultural heritage as a driver for the re-creation of the urban storytelling
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37230/CyTET.2022.213.4Keywords:
City, Cultural heritage, Urban regeneration, Massive tourism, Digital age, Urban storytellingAbstract
In today's digital and technological world, urban regeneration may no longer be a physical and architectural process, but simply a superficial staging of new and more attractive images of the city that make it a desired destination. However, representation requires a narrative that contextualizes it and gives it meaning. The cultural heritage sphere offers its spaces for this purpose as platforms for exchange and communication. This article addresses the chances of the city's inhabitants as responsible for its narration and representation. This multiplies the possibilities for democratic, open and participatory urban planning. Only in this way will urban planning be more creative and sustainable, and its narrative more suitable with the complex reality of the city.
References
Atkinson, R. & Bridge, G. (Eds.) (2004): Gentrification in a global context, Londres, Gran Bretaña, Routledge.
Aurigi, A. (2016): Making the digital city: the early shaping of urban internet space, Londres, Gran Bretaña, Routledge.
Avraham, E. (2004): Media strategies for improving an unfavorable city image. Cities, 21(6), 471-479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2004.08.005
Bach, M. & Colclough, A. & Garzillo, C. & Houpert, C. (2018): Temporary Permanence: the Intermittent City. European Journal of Creative Practices in Cities and Landscapes, 1(1).
Benjamin, W. (1969): The storyteller, New York, Schocken Books.
Brandão, P. (2011): La imagen de la ciudad: estrategias de identidad y comunicación, Barcelona, España, Edicions Universitat Barcelona.
Brea, J. L. (2007): Cultura RAM: mutaciones de la cultura en la era de su distribución electrónica, Barcelona, España, Gedisa.
Brea, J. L. (2008): El tercer umbral. Estatuto de las prácticas artísticas en la era del capitalismo cultural, Murcia, España, Cendeac.
Bullen, P. A. & Love, P. E. (2011): Adaptive reuse of heritage buildings. Structural Survey, 29(5), 411-421. https://doi.org/10.1108/02630801111182439
Casagrande, M. (2016): Heritage, tourism, and demography in the island city of Venice: depopulation and heritagization. Urban Island Studies, 2(1), 121-141. https://doi.org/10.20958/uis.2016.6
Comeron, O. (2007): Arte y postfordismo: notas desde la fábrica transparente, Madrid, España, Trama.
Debord, G. (1957): Report on the Construction of Situations and on the International Situationist Tendency’s Conditions of Organization and Action, Berkeley CA, Bureau of Public Secrets. http://www.bopsecrets.org/SI/report.htm
Echeverría, J. (1999): Los señores del aire: Telépolis y el tercer entorno, Barcelona, España, Destino.
Florida, R. (2002): The rise of the creative class, New York, EE.UU., Basic books
Foth, M. & Klaebe, H. & Hearn, G. (2008): The role of new media and digital narratives in urban planning and community development. Body, Space and Technology, 7(2), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.16995/bst.135
Frisch, M. (1990): A shared authority: Essays on the craft and meaning of oral and public history. Amsterdam, Holanda, Suny Press.
Giaccardi, E. & Palen, L. (2008): The social production of heritage through cross‐media interaction: making place for place‐making. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 14(3), 281-297. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527250801953827
Giaccardi, E. & Palen, L. (Ed.) (2012): Heritage and social media: Understanding heritage in a participatory culture, Londres, Gran Bretaña, Routledge.
Glover, N. (2008): Co-produced Histories: Mapping the Uses and Narratives of History in the Tourist Age. The Public Historian, 30(1), 105-124. https://doi.org/10.1525/tph.2008.30.1.105
Graham, M. (2013): The virtual dimension. En Global City Challenges (pp. 117-139), Londres, Gran Bretaña, Palgrave Macmillan.
Hillier, B. (2009): Spatial sustainability in cities: organic patterns and sustainable forms, Royal Institute of Technology (KTH).
Huyssen, A. (2003): Present pasts: Urban palimpsests and the politics of memory, Palo Alto, California, EE.UU., Stanford University Press.
Jiménez-Peralta, M., Jiménez-Alvarado, G., Bravo-Álvarez, G., & Reveco-Gautier, J. (2021): Emoción, geografía y patrimonio: experiencia para resignificar el espacio urbano en Valparaíso (Chile). Ciudad Y Territorio Estudios Territoriales, 53(209). https://doi.org/10.37230/CyTET.2021.209.14
Kaufmann, K. & Straganz, C. & Bork-Hüffer, T. (2020): City-life no more? Young adults’ disrupted urban experiences and their digital mediation under Covid-19. Urban Planning, 5(4), 324-334. https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v5i4.3479
Kitchin, R. (2014): The real-time city? Big data and smart urbanism. GeoJournal, 79(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-013-9516-8
Klauser, F. & Paasche, T. & Söderström, O. (2014): Michel Foucault and the smart city: power dynamics inherent in contemporary governing through code. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 32(5), 869-885. https://doi.org/10.1068/d13041p
Lamprakos, M. (2014): The idea of the historic city. Change over time, 4(1), 8-38. https://doi.org/10.1353/cot.2014.0004
Lévy, P. (1997): Collective intelligence: Mankind's emerging world in cyberspace, Cambridge, MA, EE.UU., Perseus books.
Licciardi, G. & Amirtahmasebi, R. [eds.] (2012): The economics of uniqueness: investing in historic city cores and cultural heritage assets for sustainable development, Washington, EE.UU., World Bank Publications.
Liew, C. L. & Goulding, A. & Nichol, M. (2020): From shoeboxes to shared spaces: participatory cultural heritage via digital platforms. Information, Communication & Society, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2020.1851391
Lipovetsky, G. (2014): La estetización del mundo, Barcelona, España, Anagrama.
Mager, C. & Matthey, L. (2015): Tales of the City. Storytelling as a contemporary tool of urban planning and design. Articulo-Journal of Urban Research, (Special issue 7). https://doi.org/10.4000/articulo.2779
Nas, P. J. (2016): Cities full of symbols: a theory of urban space and culture, Leiden, Holanda, University Press.
ONU (2015): Habitat III issue papers. New York: UN Habitat [Online]. http://unhabitat.org
Pratt, A. C. (2008): Creative cities: the cultural industries and the creative class. Geografiska annaler: series B, human geography, 90(2), 107-117. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0467.2008.00281.x
Ritvala, T., Granqvist, N. & Piekkari, R. (2021). A processual view of organizational stigmatization in foreign market entry: The failure of Guggenheim Helsinki. J Int Bus Stud 52, 282–305. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-020-00329-7
Rivero Moreno, L. D. (2020): Sustainable city storytelling: cultural heritage as a resource for a greener and fairer urban development. Journal of Cultural Heritage Management and Sustainable Development, 10 (4), 399-412. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCHMSD-05-2019-0043
Sandercock, L. (2003): Out of the closet: The importance of stories and storytelling in planning practice. Planning theory & practice, 4(1), 11-28. https://doi.org/10.1080/1464935032000057209
Sartori, G. (2003): Homo videns: la sociedad teledirigida, Madrid, España, Taurus.
Sassen, S. (2016): Global networks, linked cities, Londres, Gran Bretaña, Routledge.
Settis, S. (2020): Si Venecia muere, Madrid, España, Turner.
Sunesson, K. & al. (2008): Virtual reality as a new tool in the city planning process. Tsinghua Science & Technology, 13(S1), 255-260. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1007-0214(08)70158-5
Tifentale, A. & Manovich, L. (2015): Selfiecity: Exploring photography and self-fashioning in social media. En Postdigital Aesthetics (pp. 109-122), Londres, Gran Bretaña, Palgrave Macmillan.
Throgmorton, J. A. (2003): Planning as persuasive storytelling in a global-scale web of relationships. Planning Theory, 2(2), 125-151. https://doi.org/10.1177/14730952030022003
Urban, F. (2002): Small town, big website?: Cities and their representation on the Internet. Cities, 19(1), 49-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0264-2751(01)00045-2
Ureña, J. M. de, & Coronado, J. M. (2018): El patrimonio urbano como oportunidad para recualificar las periferias metropolitanas: especial referencia a Madrid. Ciudad Y Territorio Estudios Territoriales, 50(195), 85-100.
https://recyt.fecyt.es/index.php/CyTET/article/view/76611
Van Hulst, M. (2012): Storytelling, a model of and a model for planning. Planning Theory, 11(3), 299-318. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095212440425
Vanolo, A. (2008): The image of the creative city: Some reflections on urban branding in Turin. Cities, 25(6), 370-382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2008.08.001
Virilio, P. (1991): La ciudad sobreexpuesta. En P. Virilio, The lost Dimensión. New York, USA, Semiotexte.
Virilio, P. (1998): La máquina de visión, Madrid, España, Cátedra.
Waitt, G. (2000): Consuming heritage: Perceived historical authenticity. Annals of tourism research, 27(4), 835-862. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0160-7383(99)00115-2
Walford, A. (2020): Data aesthetics. En Lineages and Advancements in Material Culture Studies (pp. 205-217), Londres, Reino Unido, Routledge.
Yúdice, G. (2002): El recurso de la cultura, Barcelona, España, Gedisa.
Zaera polo, A. (1994): Conversaciones con Rafael Moneo. El croquis, 64: 6-25.
Zanini, S. (2017): Tourism pressures and depopulation in Cannaregio: Effects of mass tourism on Venetian cultural heritage. Journal of Cultural Heritage Management and Sustainable Development, 7(2), 164-178. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCHMSD-06-2016-0036
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Luis David Rivero-Moreno
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by-nc-nd/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Considering the provisions of the current legislation on Intellectual Property, and in accordance with them, all authors publishing in CyTET give -in a non-exclusive way and without time limit- to the Ministry of Transport, Mobility and Urban Agenda the rights to disseminate, reproduce, communicate and distribute in any current or future format, on paper or electronic, the original or derived version of their work under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivative 4.0 license International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), as well as to include or assign to third parties the inclusion of its content in national and international indexes, repositories and databases, with reference and recognition in any case of its authorship.
In addition, when sending the work, the author(s) declares that it is an original work in which the sources that have been used are recognized, committing to respect the scientific evidence, to no longer modify the original data and to verify or refute its hypothesis. Author(s) also declare that the essential content of the work has not been previously published nor will it be published in any other publication while it is under evaluation by CyTET; and that it has not been simultaneously sent to another journal.
Authors must sign a Transfer of Rights Form, which will be sent to them from the CyTET Secretariat once the article is accepted for publication.
With the aim of promoting the dissemination of knowledge, CyTET joins the Open Journal Access (OA) movement and delivers all of its content to various national and international indexes, repositories and databases under this protocol; therefore, the submission of a work to be published in the journal presupposes the explicit acceptance by the author of this distribution method.
Authors are encouraged to reproduce and host their work published in CyTET in institutional repositories, web pages, etc. with the intention of contributing to the improvement of the transfer of knowledge and the citation of said works.