Equidistribution in the regeneration and renovation urban integrated intervention: the new paradigm for urban intervention in the existing city

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37230/CyTET.2022.211.2

Keywords:

Urban planning, Existing city, Regeneration, Viability, Share of benefits and burdens

Abstract

The Sustainable Economy Law of 2011, developed by RDL 8/2011 and the L3R, revealed both the unsustainability of the Spanish urban model and the need to intervene differently in the existing city. However, “regeneration” as such has been a failure, as it continues to rely on subsidies and prevails among urban planners’ confidence in traditional techniques to solve the problem of degradation of the existing city. There is a full mistrust in the utility of the new models of intervention and even a deny that there is any legal novelty. The authors understand that one of the barriers of the regeneration and renewal integrated intervention (aMU-RRi) is its novel nature and the complexity of the new share of benefits and burdens model, so they proceed to develop it in the confidence that this will push forward its absolutely unavoidable implementation.

References

Cerezo Ibarrondo, A. (2018): Evolución del derecho de propiedad en cuanto al deber de conservación en la legislación de suelo y urbanismo desde 1956 a 2018, de la triada clásica a la actuación sobre el medio urbano. ACE, Arquitectura, Ciudad y Entorno (Nº 38), Barcelona: 311-313.

García de Enterría, E. & Parejo Alfonso, L.J. (1981): Lecciones de derecho Urbanístico. (pp.483-484) Madrid, Ed. Civitas S.A.

Humero Martín, A.H. (2008): Valoraciones expropiatorias y urbanísticas: LRSV 6/1998 frente al TRLS 2/2008, (p. 101) Cizur Menor, Navarra, Thompson Reuters, Ed. Aranzadi S.A.U.

León-Casero, J. & Ruiz-Varona, A. (2017): Estrategias de desarrollo urbano sostenible: inclusión social y regeneración urbana en consenso obligado. Zaragoza como caso de estudio. Universitario de Urbanística, Valladolid, Ed. Universidad de Valladolid. Ciudades 20: 119.

Parejo Alfonso, L. J. & G. Roger (2014): Comentarios a la Ley 8/2013 de 26 de junio, de Rehabilitación, Regeneración y Renovación Urbanas (L3R). (pp. 103-104) Madrid, Iustel.

Pérez-Eguíluz, V. & Fernández Maroto, M. & Rodrigo González, E. (2017): Un análisis de las condiciones para la regeneración urbana integrada a través del caso de la Estrategia de Regeneración urbana en Castilla y León. Instituto Universitario de Urbanística, Valladolid, Ed. Universidad de Valladolid. Ciudades 20: 80-81

Rosa Jiménez, C. & Márques Ballesteros, M.J. & Navas Carrillo, D. (2017): Hacia un nuevo de gestión y autofinanciación de la regeneración de barriadas obsoletas. Instituto Universitario de Urbanística, Valladolid, Ed. Universidad de Valladolid. Ciudades 20: 50.

Downloads

Published

2021-09-22

How to Cite

Cerezo-Ibarrondo, Álvaro, & Tejerina-González, J. I. (2021). Equidistribution in the regeneration and renovation urban integrated intervention: the new paradigm for urban intervention in the existing city. Ciudad Y Territorio Estudios Territoriales, 54(211), 19–36. https://doi.org/10.37230/CyTET.2022.211.2

Issue

Vol. 54 No. 211 (2022): CyTET primavera 2022

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2021 Álvaro Cerezo Ibarrondo, José Ignacio Tejerina González

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Considering the provisions of the current legislation on Intellectual Property, and in accordance with them, all authors publishing in CyTET give -in a non-exclusive way and without time limit- to the Ministry of Transport, Mobility and Urban Agenda the rights to disseminate, reproduce, communicate and distribute in any current or future format, on paper or electronic, the original or derived version of their work under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivative 4.0 license International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), as well as to include or assign to third parties the inclusion of its content in national and international indexes, repositories and databases, with reference and recognition in any case of its authorship.

In addition, when sending the work, the author(s) declares that it is an original work in which the sources that have been used are recognized, committing to respect the scientific evidence,  to no longer modify the original data and to verify or refute its hypothesis. Author(s) also declare that the essential content of the work has not been previously published nor will it be published in any other publication while it is under evaluation by CyTET; and that it has not been simultaneously sent to another journal.

Authors must sign a Transfer of Rights Form, which will be sent to them from the CyTET Secretariat once the article is accepted for publication.

With the aim of promoting the dissemination of knowledge, CyTET joins the Open Journal Access (OA) movement and delivers all of its content to various national and international indexes, repositories and databases under this protocol; therefore, the submission of a work to be published in the journal presupposes the explicit acceptance by the author of this distribution method.

Authors are encouraged to reproduce and host their work published in CyTET in institutional repositories, web pages, etc. with the intention of contributing to the improvement of the transfer of knowledge and the citation of said works.