The evaluation of environmental impact in Spain: practical outcome
Abstract
The paper makes a validity analysis of Environmental Impact Assessement (EIA) when used as a means of bettering the environmental aspect of projects. The author feels that the arbitrariness behind the drawing up of the EIA as they are invalidates them as a useful way of achieving this goal. A study is made of 67 Pleas of Environmental Impact in which discrimination against private and in favour of public projects, a host of infractions of standing regulations, the special consequences of the existence of a multiplicity of environmental agencies with differing criteria, the almost null participation of the general public are observed among the results of the legislation at present in force. The paper finishes, after first warning against the dangers of considering the EIA as a territorial administrative instrument, by arguing for a system that would include environmental considerations as part and parcel of the design process rather than a further, outside consideration during the conception of projects.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 1994 Gabriel Escobar Gómez
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by-nc-nd/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Considering the provisions of the current legislation on Intellectual Property, and in accordance with them, all authors publishing in CyTET give -in a non-exclusive way and without time limit- to the Ministry of Transport, Mobility and Urban Agenda the rights to disseminate, reproduce, communicate and distribute in any current or future format, on paper or electronic, the original or derived version of their work under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivative 4.0 license International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), as well as to include or assign to third parties the inclusion of its content in national and international indexes, repositories and databases, with reference and recognition in any case of its authorship.
In addition, when sending the work, the author(s) declares that it is an original work in which the sources that have been used are recognized, committing to respect the scientific evidence, to no longer modify the original data and to verify or refute its hypothesis. Author(s) also declare that the essential content of the work has not been previously published nor will it be published in any other publication while it is under evaluation by CyTET; and that it has not been simultaneously sent to another journal.
Authors must sign a Transfer of Rights Form, which will be sent to them from the CyTET Secretariat once the article is accepted for publication.
With the aim of promoting the dissemination of knowledge, CyTET joins the Open Journal Access (OA) movement and delivers all of its content to various national and international indexes, repositories and databases under this protocol; therefore, the submission of a work to be published in the journal presupposes the explicit acceptance by the author of this distribution method.
Authors are encouraged to reproduce and host their work published in CyTET in institutional repositories, web pages, etc. with the intention of contributing to the improvement of the transfer of knowledge and the citation of said works.