“Cuanto más cambian las cosas, más permanecen igual”: la persistente relevancia de La reproducción de Bourdieu y Passeron

Autores/as

  • Diane Reay University of Cambridge

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22325/fes/res.2022.116

Palabras clave:

Reproducción, estructura, agencia, resistencia, clase social, desigualdades educativas

Resumen

La publicación de La reproducción, de Bourdieu y Passeron, tuvo respuestas diversas. Por un lado, el trabajo fue criticado por su determinismo y su pronóstico pesimista sobre las posibilidades del cambio educativo y, por otro, alabado por su complejo análisis de la relación entre la educación y las desigualdades de clase, y de los mecanismos de la dominación de clase a través del sistema educativo. Este artículo explora la recepción de La reproducción, y de su complemento, Los herederos, antes de examinar cuál fue, y sigue siendo, su contribución a la comprensión de las desigualdades de clase social en educación. Defiende que este trabajo sigue teniendo tanta relevancia en Inglaterra contemporánea como la que tuvo en Francia en los años 1960. Además de analizar la relevancia de La reproducción en el siglo XXI, el artículo se centra en el potencial del análisis de Bourdieu y Passeron para producir conceptualizaciones de la reproducción educativa y social vivas y con lugar para la agencia, partiendo de estudios de casos recientes de centros escolares ingleses. No obstante, también defiende que la falta de un cuestionamiento suficiente del código educativo dominante, así como la ausencia de dimensión moral de la cultura de clase, hacen de su estudio un trabajo en elaboración que necesita de las aportaciones posteriores de Bourdieu para fructificar.

Citas

Abrahams, J. (forthcoming). Schooling Inequality.

Alston, P. (2018). Report of the Special Rapporteur on extreme poverty and human rights in the UK.

Atkinson, W. (2015). Class: key concepts. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Atkinson, W. (2021). The social space and misrecognition in 21st century France. The Sociological Review, 69(5), 990-1012.

Backer, D., & Cairns, K. (2021). Social reproduction theory revisited. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 42(7), 1086-1104. https://doi.org/10.1080/01425692.2021.1953962

Baker, T. (2017). Doing things differently in East London. Nesta. https://www.nesta.org.uk/blog/school-21-doing-things-differently-in-east-london/

Ball, S. J. (1981). Beachside Comprehensive: a Case-Study of Secondary Schooling. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Beck, U., & Beck-Gernsheim, E. (2002). Individualization. London: Sage.

Bourdieu P., & Boltanski, L. (1975). Le Fétichisme de la langue. Actes de la Recherche en Sciences Sociales, 4, 2-32.

Bourdieu, P (2018) Classification Struggles Cambridge: Polity Press.

Bourdieu, P and Wacquant, L. (1992). An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Bourdieu, P. (1985a). The genesis of the concepts of Habitus and of Field. Sociocriticism, 2, 11-24.

Bourdieu, P. (1985b). From rules to strategies: an interview with Pierre Bourdieu, Cultural Anthropology, 1, 110-120.

Bourdieu, P. (1989). Social Space and Symbolic Power. Sociological Theory, 7(1), 14-25.

Bourdieu, P. (1990). In Other Words: Essays towards a Reflexive Sociology. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

Bourdieu, P. (1993a). Concluding remarks: for a sociogenetic understanding of intellectual works. In C. Calhoun, E. Lipuma, and M. Postone (Eds.), Bourdieu: critical perspectives. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Bourdieu, P. (2000). A Sociologist in the World. Revue d’etudes palestiniennes, 74(22), 3-13.

Bourdieu, P., & Delsaut, Y. (2002). “Entretien sur l’esprit de la recherche. In Y. Delsaut and M.- C. Rivière, Bibliographie des travaux de Pierre Bourdieu. Pantin: Le Temps des Cerises.

Bourdieu, P., & Passeron, J-C. (1977). Reproduction in Education, Society and Culture. London: Sage Publications Ltd.

Bourdieu, P., & Passeron, J-C. (1979). The Inheritors. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Bright, N. G. (2011). Insubordinate Spaces: School Disaffection, Refusal and Resistance in a Former English Coalfield. European Educational Research Journal, 10(4), 502-515.

Burawoy, M., & von Holdt, K. (2012). Conversations with Bourdieu: The Johannesburg Moment. Johannesburg: Wits University Press.

Butler, J. (1999). Performativity’s social magic. In R. Shusterman (Ed.), Bourdieu:A critical reader (pp. 113-128). Oxford/Malden, MA: Blackwell.

Cameron, D. (2015). The Tory Party Conference: David Cameron’s speech in full The Independent 7th October 2015.

Charlesworth, S. (2000). A phenomenology of working class experience. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Cipollone, K., & Stich, A. E. (2017). Shadow capital: The democratization of college preparatory education. Sociology of Education, 90(4), 333-354.

Collini, S. (2010). Blahspeak. London Review of Books, 32(7), 29-34. https://www.lrb.co.uk/the-paper/v32/n07/stefan-collini/blahspeak

DfE (2021) Academic Year 2019-20 Widening Participation in Higher Education. Gov.uk. https://explore-education-statistics.service.gov.uk/find-statistics/widening-participation-in-higher-education/2019-20

Economic Policy Institute. (2017). State of Working America Data Library Compensation, Wages and Benefits. New York: EPI.

Evans, G., & Tilley, J. (2017). The new politics of class: The political exclusion of the British working class. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Flecha, R., & Soler, M. (2013). Turning difficulties into possibilities: engaging Roma families and students in school through dialogic learning. Cambridge Journal of Education, 43(4), 451-465. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2013.819068

Flemmen, M,. Toft, M,. Andersen, P,. Nordli Hansen, M,. & Ljunggren, J. (2017). Forms of Capital and Modes of Closure in Upper Class Reproduction. Sociology, 51(6), 1277-1298.

Fowler, B. (2020). Pierre Bourdieu on social transformation, with particular reference to political and symbolic revolutions. Theory and Society, 49, 439-463. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-019-09375-z

Friedman, S,. O’Brien, D,. & McDonald, S. (2021). Deflecting Privilege: Class Identity and the Intergenerational Self. Sociology, 55(4), 716-733.

Friedman, S., & Laurison, D. (2019). The Class Ceiling: Why it pays to be privileged. Bristol: Policy Press.

Friedman, S., & Savage, M. (2018). Time, accumulation and trajectory: Bourdieu and Social Mobility. En S. Lawler, and G. Payne (Eds.), Social Mobility for the 21st Century (pp 67-79). London: Routledge.

Frye, M. (2019). The myth of agency and the misattribution of blame in collective imaginaries of the future. British Journal of Sociology, 70(3), 721-730.

Giroux, H. (1983). Theories of Reproduction and Resistance in the New Sociology of Education: A Critical Analysis. Harvard Educational Review, 53(3), 257-293.

Goldthorpe, J. H. (2007). “Cultural capital”: some critical comments. Sociologica, (2). https://doi.org/10.2383/24755.

Gramsci, A. (1996). Prison Notebooks. (Trans. J. A. Buttigieg, & A. Callari). New York: Columbia University Press.

Halsey, A. H., Heath, A. F., & Ridge, J. M. (1980). Origins and Destinations. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Harker, R. (1984). On Reproduction, Habitus and Education. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 5(2), 117-127.

Harris, A., & Dobson, A. S. (2015). Theorizing agency in post-girlpower times. Continuum, 29(2), 145-156.

Hilton, A. (2018). Academies and Free Schools in England. London: Routledge.

Horowitz, J., et al. (2020). Trends in income and wealth inequality. Pew Research Center.

Hutchinson, J., Reader, M., & Akhal, A. (2020). Education in England: Annual Report 2020. London: Education Policy Institute.

James, D. (2019). How Bourdieu bites back. In D. Reay (Ed.), Bourdieu and Education. London: Routledge.

Jenkins, R. (1982). Pierre Bourdieu and the Reproduction of Determinism. Sociology, 16(2), 270-281.

Jenkins, R. (1992). Pierre Bourdieu. London: Routledge.

King, A. (2000). Thinking with Bourdieu against Bourdieu: A 'Practical' Critique of the Habitus. Sociological Theory, 18(3), 417-433.

Kulz, C. (2017). Factories for Learning: Making race, class and inequality in the neoliberal academy. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

Kulz, C., Morrin, K., & McGinity, R. (2022). Inside the English education lab: critical qualitative and ethnographic perspectives on the academies experiment. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

Kuppens, T., Spears, R., Manstead, A., Spruyt, B. and Easterbrook, M. (2018) Educationism and the irony of meritocracy: negative attitudes of higher educated people towards the less educated. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 76, 429-447. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2017.11.001

Lahire, B. (1998). L’Homme pluriel: Les ressorts de l’action. Paris: Nathan.

Lamont, M. (2019). “From ‘having’ to ‘being’: self-worth and the current crisis of American society. British Journal of Sociology, 70(3), 660-707.

Lane, J. F. (2006). Bourdieu’s Politics. Problems and Possibilities. Abingdon: Routledge. http://ndl.ethernet.edu.et/bitstream/123456789/10182/1/101.pdf.pdf

Lareau, A. (1989). Home Advantage: Social Class and Parental Intervention in Elementary Education. Falmer Press.

Lareau, A., & Ferguson, S. (2017). Cultural Exclusion of Upwardly Mobile College Students. Paper presented at the American Sociological Association August 12, 2017, Montreal.

Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the Social. An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Lawler, S. (2004). Rules of engagement: Habitus, power and resistance. In L. Adkins and B. Skeggs (Eds.), Feminism After Bourdieu (pp 110-128). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.

Lee, H. (1960) To Kill a Mockingbird. New York: Harper Collins.

Littler, J. (2018) Against Meritocracy: Culture, Power, and Myths of Mobility. London: Routledge.

Mahar, C. (1990). Pierre Bourdieu: the intellectual project. In R. Harker,. C. Mahar,. and C. Wilkes (Eds.), An introduction to the work of Pierre Bourdieu: the practice of theory. London: MacMillan.

Medvetz, T., & Sallaz, J. (2018). Introduction: Pierre Bourdieu, a twentieth century life. In T. Medvetz, & J. Sallaz (Eds), The Oxford Handbook of Pierre Bourdieu. (pp 1-21).Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Morrin, K. (2018). Tensions in Teaching Character: How the ‘Entrepreneurial Character’ is Reproduced, ‘Refused’, and Negotiated in an English Academy School. Sociological Research Online, 23(2), 459-476. https://doi.org/10.1177/1360780418769670

Mortimore, P. (1993). School Effectiveness and the Management of Effective Learning and Teaching. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 4(4), 290-310.

National Education Union [NEU]. (2017). Groupings in Early Years and Key Stage 1: A Necessary Evil?. London: National Education Union.

Obama, B. (2020). A Promised Land. New York: Viking.

Obama, M. (2018). Becoming. New York: Penguin

OECD. (2021). Education at a Glance. Geneva: OECD

Office for National Statistics [ONS]. (2021). Household income inequality, UK: financial year ending 2020. London: ONS.

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development [OECD]. (2019). Combined Executive Summaries PISA 2018. Geneva: OECD. https://www.oecd.org/pisa/Combined_Executive_Summaries_PISA_2018.pdf

Papilloud, C., & Schultz, E-M. (2018). Pierre Bourdieu and Relational Sociology En F. Dépelteau (Ed.), The Palgrave Handbook of Relational Sociology (pp 343-358). New York: Palgrave.

Peters, M. A. (2017). From State responsibility for education and welfare to self-responsibilisation in the market. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 38(1), 138-145.

Reay, D. (1998). Class Work: Mothers’ involvement in children’s schooling. London: University College Press.

Reay, D. (2004). 'Mostly Roughs and Toughs': Social class, race and representation in inner city schooling Sociology, 38(4), 1005-1023.

Reay, D. (2017). Miseducation: Education, Inequality and the Working Classes. Bristol: Policy Press.

Reay, D. (2019). Introduction: Comprehension through Use: Working with Bourdieu in Educational Research En D. Reay (Ed.), Bourdieu and Education (pp 1-11). New York: Routledge.

Reay, D. (2020). The Perils and Penalties of Meritocracy: Sanctioning Inequalities and Legitimating Prejudice. The Political Quarterly, 91(2), 405-412.

Reay, D. (2022a) A conflictual legacy: being a coal miner’s daughter. In R. Simmons, and K. Simpson (Eds.), Education, Work and Social Change in Britain's Former Coalfield Communities. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

Reay, D. (2022b). From worse to worse: Why is it so difficult to change English education for the better?. FORUM, 64(1), 9-18. https://doi.org/10.3898/forum.2022.64.1.01

Reynolds, D. (2010). School Effectiveness. London: Bloomsbury Press.

Robbins, D. (2006). On Bourdieu, Education and Society. London: The Bardwell Press.

Robbins, D. (2019). The Bourdieu Paradigm: The Origins and Evolution of an Intellectual Social Project. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

Robertson, S., Harris, A., & Baldassar, L. (2017). Mobile transitions: a conceptual framework for researching a generation on the move. Journal of Youth Studies, 21(2), 203-217. https://doi.org/10.1080/13676261.2017.1362101

Sassatelli, R., Santoro, M., & Willis, P. (2009). An Interview with Paul Willis: Commodification, Resistance and Reproduction. European Journal of Social Theory, 12(2), 265-289. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431009106205

Sayer, A (2005). The Moral Significance of Class. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Sewell, W. H. (1992). A Theory of Structure: Duality, Agency, and Transformation. American Journal of Sociology, 98(1), 1-29.

Social Mobility Commission. (2021). State of the Nation 2021. London: Social Mobility Commission.

Song, X,. Massey, C,. Rolf, K,. Ferried, J,. Rothbaume, J., & Xie, Y. (2020). Long-term decline in intergenerational mobility in the United States since the 1850s. PNAS, 117(1), 251-258.

Spohrer, K., Stahl, G., & Bowers-Brown, T. (2018). Constituting neoliberal subjects? ‘Aspiration’ as technology of government in UK policy discourse. Journal of Education Policy, 33(3), 327-342.

Sumroy, A (2022): ‘We’re not robots!’: the interaction of cooperativism and neoliberalism for students at a Co-op academy. British Journal of Sociology of Education 43(2), 278-295. https://doi.org/10.1080/01425692.2021.2018649

Thompson, G., Lingard, B., & Ball, S. J. (2021) ‘Indentured autonomy’:headteachers and academisation policy in Northern England. Journal of Educational Administration and History, 53(3-4), 215-232.

Wacquant, L. (1992). Towards a social praxeology: the structure and logic of Bourdieu's sociology. In P. Bourdieu, and L. Wacquant (Eds.), An Invitation to reflexive sociology. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Wacquant, L. (1993). From Ruling Class to Field of Power: An Interview with Pierre Bourdieu on La Noblesse d’État. Theory, Culture & Society, 10(3), 19-44. https://doi.org/10.1177/026327693010003002

Weininger, E., & Lareau, A. (2018). Pierre Bourdieu’s Sociology of Education: Institutional Form and Social Inequality. In T. Medvetz, and J. Sallaz (Eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Pierre Bourdieu (pp. 253-272). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

West, A (2021) Privatisation of education in the English school system. Revue internationale d'éducation de Sèvres, (82), 76-84.

Williams, R. (1981). Culture. London: Fontana Press.

Willis, P. (1981). Cultural Production is Different from Cultural Reproduction is Different from Social Reproduction is Different from Reproduction. Interchange, 12(2-3), 48-67. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01192107.

Wright, R. (2019, April 30). UK social mobility has stalled, warns commission: Class privilege entrenched at ‘virtually all life stages’. The Financial Times.

Young, M. (2009). ‘What are schools for?’. In H. Daniels, H. Lauder, & J. Porter (Eds.), Knowledge, Values and Educational Policy: A critical perspective (pp. 10-18). London: Routledge.

Publicado

2022-06-24

Cómo citar

Reay, D. (2022). “Cuanto más cambian las cosas, más permanecen igual”: la persistente relevancia de La reproducción de Bourdieu y Passeron. Revista Española De Sociología, 31(3), a116. https://doi.org/10.22325/fes/res.2022.116