Writing, creativity, and artificial intelligence. ChatGPT in the university context

 María Isabel Vicente-Yagüe-Jara, Murcia (Spain)

 Olivia López-Martínez, Murcia (Spain)

 Verónica Navarro-Navarro, Salamanca (Spain)

 Francisco Cuéllar-Santiago, Elche (Spain)

https://doi.org/10.3916/C77-2023-04

Keywords

Artificial intelligence, writing, language teaching, verbal creativity, ChatGPT, Large Language Models

Abstract

The main objective of the research is to study the creative potential of Artificial Intelligence (AI) for writing skills in an educational context. The research aims to provide evidence on the use of AI and contribute to its integration in the classroom as a support for the teaching-learning process. Two types of research designs were established: a descriptive and comparative non-experimental quantitative research, and a quasi-experimental pretest-posttest study. The sample consisted of 20 AI systems and 193 university students who were given Games 2 and 3 of the Spanish PIC-A test (“Creative Imagination Test for Adults”). The students repeated the games, assisted by ChatGPT, to compare the possible improvement of their productions. The findings reveal statistically significant differences between the AIs and the students in the indicators of fluency, flexibility, and narrative originality in Game 2. Furthermore, significant differences are found between students’ pre-test and post-test scores in fluency, flexibility, and narrative originality in Game 2 and in fluency in Game 3. Finally, the assistance provided by AI in writing tasks and verbal creativity is highlighted, and this should be considered in language teaching; in any case, AI cannot replace human intelligence and creativity.

References

Aleksi, D., Cerne, M., Dysvik, A., & Skerlavaj, M. (2016). I want to be creative, but... Preference for creativity, perceived clear outcome goals, work enjoyment, and creative performance. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 25(3), 363–383. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2015.1077809

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Argondizzo, C. (Ed.) (2012). Creativity and innovation in language education. Peter Lang. https://doi.org/10.3726/978-3-0351-0431-8

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Artola, T., Barraca, J., Mosteiro, P., Ancillo, I., Poveda, B., & Sa?nchez, N. (2012). PIC-A. Prueba de Imaginación Creativa para Adultos. TEA Ediciones. https://bit.ly/3O3GEtn

Link Google Scholar

Boden, M.A. (2004). The creative mind: Myths and mechanisms. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203508527

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Boden, M.A. (2018). Artificial Intelligence: A very short introduction. Oxford. https://doi.org/10.1093/actrade/9780199602919.001.0001

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Bonami, B., Piazentini, L., & Dala-Possa, A. (2020). Education, big data and artificial intelligence: Mixed methods in digital platforms. [Educación, Big Data e Inteligencia Artificial: Metodologías mixtas en plataformas digitales]. Comunicar, 65, 43-52. https://doi.org/10.3916/C65-2020-04

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Breton (Ed.) (2021). Una Europa adaptada a la era digital: la comisión propone nuevas normas y medidas para favorecer la excelencia y la confianza en la inteligencia artificial. Comisión Europea. https://bit.ly/3xWJvez

Link Google Scholar

Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1998). Creatividad: El fluir y la psicología del descubrimiento y la invención. Paidós. https://bit.ly/3pyqoqi

Link Google Scholar

Donolo, D., & Elisondo, R. (2007). Creatividad para todos. Consideraciones sobre un grupo particular. Anales de Psicología, 23(1), 148-151. https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Edelvives (Ed.) (2023). Edelvives se convierte en la primera editorial en integrar ChatGPT en su plataforma educativa. http://bit.ly/3HN2rSu

Link Google Scholar

Else, H. (2023). Abstracts written by ChatGPT fool scientists. Nature, 613(7944), 423. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-023-00056-7

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Flores-Vivar, J.M., & F.J. García-Peñalvo (2023). Reflexiones sobre la e?tica, potencialidades y retos de la Inteligencia Artificial en el marco de la Educacio?n de Calidad (ODS4). [Reflections on the ethics, potential, and challenges of artificial intelligence in the framework of quality education (SDG4)]. Comunicar, 74, 37-47. https://doi.org/10.3916/C74-2023-03

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Fyfe, P. (2022). How to cheat on your final paper: Assigning AI for student writing. AI & Society. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-022-01397-z

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Gade, R. (2023). Become a published author using ChatGPT. PUBLISHER S21598.

Link Google Scholar

Goleman, D., Kaufman, P., & Ray, M. (2016). El espíritu creativo. Ediciones B. https://bit.ly/44WZpoD

Link Google Scholar

Guilford, J.P. (1950). Creativity. American Psychologist, 5(9), 444-454. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0063487

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Gutiérrez-Fandiño, A., Armengol-Estapé, J., Pàmies, M., Llop-Palao, J., Silveira-Ocampo, J., Carrino, C.P., González-Aguirre, A., Armentano-Oller, C., Rodríguez-Penagos, C., & Villegas, M. (2022). MarIA: Spanish Language Models. Procesamiento del Lenguaje Natural, 68, 39-60. https://doi.org/10.26342/2022-68-3

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2019). Artificial intelligence in education. Promises and implications for teaching and learning. Center for Curriculum Redesign. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60013-0_107-1

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Hora, S., Badura, K.L., Lemoine, G.J., & Grijalva, E. (2022). A meta-analytic examination of the gender difference in creative performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 107(11), 1926-1950. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000999

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Hutson, M. (2022). Could AI help you to write your next paper? Nature, 611, 192-193. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-022-03479-w

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

INTEF (Ed.) (2022). IA y educacio?n: Orientaciones para los responsables de la elaboracio?n de poli?ticas. Ministerio de Educación y Formación Profesional. https://bit.ly/3meypiA

Link Google Scholar

Lee, A. (2023). What are large language models used for? NVIDIA. http://bit.ly/3KHkFH3

Link Google Scholar

Miller, A.I. (2019). The artist in the machine. The world of AI-powered creativity. The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/11585.001.0001

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Montero, L. (2023, February 5). ¿Somos un cerebro flotando en una cubeta? [Fallo de sistema, Radio 3]. https://bit.ly/3m1agf0

Link Google Scholar

Munari, B. (2018). Fantasía. Invención, creatividad e imaginación en las comunicaciones visuales. Gustavo Gili. https://bit.ly/3LVYf3P

Link Google Scholar

OCDE (Ed.) (2019). PISA 2021 Creative thinking framework (third draft). https://bit.ly/3IXBdt6

Link Google Scholar

OCDE (Ed.) (2021). OECD Digital Education Outlook 2021: Pushing the frontiers with artificial intelligence, blockchain and robots. https://doi.org/10.1787/589b283f-en

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

OpenAI (Ed.) (2023). Classifier. http://bit.ly/3KHD4nd

Link Google Scholar

O’Connor, S., & ChatGPT (2023). Open artificial intelligence platforms in nursing education: Tools for academic progress or abuse? Nurse Education in Practice, 66, 103537-103537. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2022.103537

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Peirón, F. (2023, January 6). Nueva York prohíbe el ChatGPT en sus escuelas. La Vanguardia. http://bit.ly/41wFCe0

Link Google Scholar

Real Academia Española -RAE- (s.f.). Proyecto Lengua Española e Inteligencia Artificial (LEIA). https://bit.ly/3SFIj92

Link Google Scholar

Renbarger, M. (2023, January 11). Esta emprendedora ha usado ChatGPT para escribir un libro infantil en 2 horas: quiere demostrar que la IA generativa puede ser una poderosa herramienta de aprendizaje. Business Insider. http://bit.ly/3J0Jcpv

Link Google Scholar

Rodrigo-Martín, I., Rodrigo-Martín, L., & Pérez-García, A. (2022). La creatividad como herramienta para comprender la educación: El papel de la creatividad como catalizador de la transformación de la educación. Visual Culture Review, 9(3),1-12. https://doi.org/10.37467/revvisual.v9.3533

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Sadin, E. (2018). La inteligencia artificial o el desafío del siglo. Caja Negra Editora. https://bit.ly/3MiBQzg

Link Google Scholar

Sánchez, A. (2023, February 12). El chat GPT obliga a repensar los exámenes y las prácticas en las aulas murcianas. La Opinión. http://bit.ly/3ZnoBkv

Link Google Scholar

Selwyn, N., Rivera-Vargas P., Passeron, E., & Miño-Puigcercós, R. (2022). ¿Por qué no todo es (ni debe ser) digital? Interrogantes para pensar sobre digitalización, datificación e inteligencia artificial en educación. In P. Rivera-Vargas, R. Miño-Puigcercós, & E. Passeron (Eds.), Educar con sentido transformador en la universidad (pp. 137-148). Octaedro. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/vx4zr

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Sternberg, R.J. (1999). Handbook of creativity. Cambridge University Press. https://bit.ly/3nUDtd2

Link Google Scholar

Sun, Z., Anbarasan, M., & Kumar, D.P. (2021). Design of online intelligent English teaching platform based on artificial intelligence techniques. Computational Intelligence, 37(3), 1166-1180. https://doi.org/10.1111/coin.12351

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Turing, A.M. (1950). Computing Machinery and Intelligence. Mind, 59(236), 433-460. https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/LIX.236.433

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

UNESCO (Ed.) (2019). International conference on Artificial intelligence and Education, Planning education in the AI Era: Lead the leap: Final report. https://bit.ly/3kEhqpb

Link Google Scholar

UNESCO (Ed.) (2021). International Forum on AI and the Futures of Education, developing competencies for the AI Era, 7-8 December 2020: Synthesis report. UNESCO. http://bit.ly/3VKXAac

Link Google Scholar

UNESCO (Ed.) (2022a). Recomendación sobre la ética de la inteligencia artificial. https://bit.ly/3KBvPx8

Link Google Scholar

UNESCO (Ed.) (2022b). K-12 AI curricula: A mapping of government-endorsed AI curricula. https://bit.ly/3B6f6xi

Link Google Scholar

UNESCO (Ed.) (s.f.). Teaching AI for K-12. https://bit.ly/3KHI6A7

Link Google Scholar

Universidad de Murcia (Ed.) (2022). Co?digo de Buenas Pra?cticas en Investigacio?n de la Universidad de Murcia. http://bit.ly/3M1tlZb

Link Google Scholar

Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., Uszkoreit, J., Jones, L., Gomez, A.N., Kaiser, L., & Polosukhin, I. (2017). Attention is all you need. Advances in neural information processing systems, 30. http://bit.ly/3kx6F89

Link Google Scholar

Vázquez, D. (2023, February 13). Lo quieran los profesores o no, ChatGPT ya está aquí: Por qué muchos creen que hay que adoptar la IA en lugar de rechazarla. Business Insider. http://bit.ly/3IxlsI1

Link Google Scholar

Ward, M. (2020). Victorian fictions of computational creativity. In S. Cave, K. Dihal, & S. Dillon (Eds.), AI Narratives: A history of imaginative thinking about intelligent machines (pp. 144-164). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198846666.001.0001

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Yanhua, Z. (2020). The application of artificial intelligence in foreign language teaching. 2020 International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Education (ICAIE). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICAIE50891.2020.00017

Link DOI | Link Google Scholar

Fundref

The study was carried out within the framework of the R&D&I project “Creatividad verbal como dominio: diseño, validación y aplicación de una prueba fundamentada en la comprensión de textos” [“Verbal creativity as a domain: design, validation and application of a test based on text comprehension”] (PID2020-113731GB-I00), funded by MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033. Modalities “Research Challenges” and “Knowledge Generation” (without ERDF funding). Interdisciplinary Research Group: Psicología Educativa y Didáctica de la Lengua, la Literatura y las Artes [Educational Psychology and Didactics of Language, Literature, and the Arts] (E042-08, University of Murcia).

Crossmark

Technical information

Received: 27-02-2023

Revised: 31-03-2023

Accepted: 02-05-2023

OnlineFirst: 30-06-2023

Publication date: 01-10-2023

Article revision time: 31 days | Average time revision issue 77: 31 days

Article acceptance time: 63 days | Average time of acceptance issue 77: 75 days

Preprint editing time: 170 days | Average editing time preprint issue 77: 182 days

Article editing time: 215 days | Average editing time issue 77: 227 days

Metrics

Metrics of this article

Views: 78033

Abstract readings: 70405

PDF downloads: 7628

Full metrics of Comunicar 77

Views: 720915

Abstract readings: 698601

PDF downloads: 22314

Cited by