The right of residence of citizens’ parents, nationals from third-countries, and the highest interest of the EU child. Judgment of the Court of Justice (Grand Chamber) of 10 May 2017, case C-133/15, Chávez-Vílchez

Authors

  • Valeria Di Comite Università degli studi di Bari Aldo Moro

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18042/cepc/rdce.58.07

Keywords:

EU Citizenship, derived right of residence to third-countries nationals, access to social assistance and child benefit, the highest interest of the child.

Abstract

The derived right of residence of EU citizens’ relatives, nationals from third-countries, recognized by the case-law, has been widely discussed in recent years, above all after Ruiz Zambrano judgment. In Chávez-Vílchez judgment, analysed in this work, the Court of Justice focuses its attention not only on the interpretation of TFUE Article 20, but above all on the principle of the highest interest of the child. The work points out that EU younger citizens are better protected by a joint application of Article 20 TFEU and Article 7 of the Charter together with the principle recognised by Article 24 of the Charter. These young citizens strongly depend on their mothers, therefore if the right of residence is not given to their mothers, nationals from third-countries, their children will be obliged to leave EU, thus depriving them of «the genuine enjoyment of the substance of the rights conferred by the status» of EU citizenship.

Author Biography

Valeria Di Comite, Università degli studi di Bari Aldo Moro

profesora titular de Derecho de la Unión europea;

colaboradora del Grupo de investigación Estudios Jurídicos Internacionales y Europeos (SEJ-133).

Published

2017-12-14

Issue

Section

CASE LAW COURT OF JUSTICE OF THE EU