The European Union as a singular international legal subject in arctic governance
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18042/cepc/rdce.57.03Keywords:
European Union, international legal personality, Arctic, European Arctic, climate change, Arctic governance, European Economic Area, Arctic Council.Abstract
Since the 1990s, the Arctic has been inevitably and progressively linked to climate change, causing great environmental concern and high expectations of economic exploitation. Until very recently, the special vulnerability of the Arctic has been protected from human exploitation because of its difficult access and habitability. Now this vulnerability is beginning to be compromised not only by its progressive accessibility as a consequence of the Arctic ice melt, but particularly by its probable profitability. Concern about this new scenario calls for enhanced legal protection, and although the international strategy to be followed led to some debate at first, the approach about Arctic governance is now sectoral and multileveled. As a result, the EU presence in that process is unequal (different according to the forum) and asymmetrical (it does not always correspond to the competences conferred by the states to the EU). In this area, the challenges that generally face the EU in terms of admission to the international legal community, show clearly. With respect to Arctic governance, the EU is not a forum (such as the Arctic Council) but an actor (as are States, Arctic and non-Arctic). However, being an International Organization and frequently coexist with its own Members —some of them Arctic— in the same forums where Arctic issues are addressed, do not facilitate its acceptance as an Arctic actor. The progress that may take place in relation to the acceptance of the EU in the international legal community, and the strengthening of a European Arctic with its own characteristics, may be elements in its favour.Downloads
Issue
Section
STUDIES
License
Copyright
Submission of a manuscript to the RDCE implies having read and accepted the journal's editorial guidelines and instructions for authors. When a work is accepted for publication, it is understood that the author grants the RDCE exclusive rights of reproduction, distribution and, where appropriate, sale of his manuscript for exploitation in all countries of the world in printed version, as well as any other magnetic, optical and digital media.
Authors shall transfer the publishing rights of their manuscript to RDCE so that it may be disseminated and capitalised on Intranets, the Internet and any web portals and wireless devices that the publisher may decide, by placing it at the disposal of users so that the latter may consult it online and extract content from it, print it and/or download and save it. These activities must comply with the terms and conditions outlined on the website hosting the work. However, the RDCE authorises authors of papers published in the journal to include a copy of these papers, once published, on their personal websites and/or other open access digital repositories. Copies must include a specific mention of RDCE, citing the year and issue of the journal in which the article was published, and adding a link to the RDCE website(s).
A year after its publication, the works of the RDCE will be under the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-NoDerivative 4.0 International license (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which allows third parties to share the work as long as its author and its first publication is indicated, without the right to commercial exploitation and the elaboration of derivative works.
Plagiarism and scientific fraud
The publication of work that infringes on intellectual property rights is the sole responsibility of the authors, including any conflicts that may occur regarding infringement of copyright. This includes, most importantly, conflicts related to the commission of plagiarism and/or scientific fraud.
Practices constituting scientific plagiarism are as follows:
1. Presenting the work of others as your own.
2. Adopting words or ideas from other authors without due recognition.
3. Not using quotation marks or another distinctive format to distinguish literal quotations.
4. Giving incorrect information about the true source of a citation.
5. The paraphrasing of a source without mentioning the source.
6. Excessive paraphrasing, even if the source is mentioned.
Practices constituting scientific fraud are as follows:
1. Fabrication, falsification or omission of data and plagiarism.
2. Duplicate publication.
3. Conflicts of authorship.
Warning
Any breach of these Rules shall constitute a ground for rejection of the manuscript submitted.