The judgment of the German Federal Constitutional Court of 30.06.2009, relating to the approval of the Lisbon Treaty – Analysis and reflections.
Keywords:
German Federal Constitutional Court. Lisbon Treaty. Sovereignty. Democracy. Right to vote.Abstract
The ruling of 30 June 2009 takes stock of the process of European integration, and set out the possibilities its future development. For the judges of Karlsruhe the inalienable constitutional identity of the German Federal Republic is supported i two pillars: a sovereign people that decide on its political future through elections, and a State that keeps sufficient competences. If the EU extended its powers, it would deprive Member States of their own sovereignty and it would become a Bundesstaat. The GCC announces that it will also review in the future if the amendments in primary law of the EU affect the constitutional identity of the Federal Republic, besides the acts vires review that its case law already accepted. Even if it is finally considered that the Lisbon Treaty is not contrary to the Fundamental Law (Grundgesetz), the ruling opens limited avenues for deepening European integration, and the general tone is of clear scepticism with respect to the latter. The GCC constructs a line of defence against the risks that integration entails. The GCC does not say openly that the Lisbon Treaty already defines the maximum of powers that may be attributed to the EU, but suggests that additional powers will be limited, in a probable process of deceleration of European integration, and under the close supervision of the GCC.Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Downloads
Published
2010-02-24
Issue
Section
JURISPRUDENCE
License
Copyright
Submission of a manuscript to the RDCE implies having read and accepted the journal's editorial guidelines and instructions for authors. When a work is accepted for publication, it is understood that the author grants the RDCE exclusive rights of reproduction, distribution and, where appropriate, sale of his manuscript for exploitation in all countries of the world in printed version, as well as any other magnetic, optical and digital media.
Authors shall transfer the publishing rights of their manuscript to RDCE so that it may be disseminated and capitalised on Intranets, the Internet and any web portals and wireless devices that the publisher may decide, by placing it at the disposal of users so that the latter may consult it online and extract content from it, print it and/or download and save it. These activities must comply with the terms and conditions outlined on the website hosting the work. However, the RDCE authorises authors of papers published in the journal to include a copy of these papers, once published, on their personal websites and/or other open access digital repositories. Copies must include a specific mention of RDCE, citing the year and issue of the journal in which the article was published, and adding a link to the RDCE website(s).
A year after its publication, the works of the RDCE will be under the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-NoDerivative 4.0 International license (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which allows third parties to share the work as long as its author and its first publication is indicated, without the right to commercial exploitation and the elaboration of derivative works.
Plagiarism and scientific fraud
The publication of work that infringes on intellectual property rights is the sole responsibility of the authors, including any conflicts that may occur regarding infringement of copyright. This includes, most importantly, conflicts related to the commission of plagiarism and/or scientific fraud.
Practices constituting scientific plagiarism are as follows:
1. Presenting the work of others as your own.
2. Adopting words or ideas from other authors without due recognition.
3. Not using quotation marks or another distinctive format to distinguish literal quotations.
4. Giving incorrect information about the true source of a citation.
5. The paraphrasing of a source without mentioning the source.
6. Excessive paraphrasing, even if the source is mentioned.
Practices constituting scientific fraud are as follows:
1. Fabrication, falsification or omission of data and plagiarism.
2. Duplicate publication.
3. Conflicts of authorship.
Warning
Any breach of these Rules shall constitute a ground for rejection of the manuscript submitted.
