Delegated acts in the system of the sources of European Union Law.
Keywords:
Sources of European law – Secondary law – Legislation – Non-legislativeacts – Delegated regulations – Delegated Directives – Secondary legal bases – Comitology – Groups of experts – European Parliament – Council – European Commission – Court of Justice –Abstract
This paper discusses legal questions about the new class of «delegated acts» , in the light of the preparatory work in the European Convention and the two Intergovernmental Conferences that followed, of developments in comitology and in the caselaw of the Court of Justice after the signature of the Constitutional Treaty, of the context of the Lisbon Treaty and its Protocols, of the practice followed in the first year of implementation of the new provisions and, of course, of pertinent legal writings on the Constitutional or the Lisbon Treaties. There is a focus on the contents and the scope of the power to delegate (scope of application, object, implementing or modifying delegated acts, duration of the delegation, legal effects), on the preparation of delegated acts (Commission’s autonomy, consultations, intervention of expert groups) and on the supervision of both the delegations and the delegated acts: political supervision (procedures ex ante available for the European Parliament and the Council supervision by the Parliaments of the Member States) and judicial remedies before the Court of Justice or the General Court, available for Member States, European institutions, the Committee of the Regions or private persons. As final remarks there is an emphasis on the new nature of legislative acts, quite different from delegated legislation in countries where the executive enjoys large regulatory powers of its own, plus some reflections on the progress achieved by means of the Treaty of Lisbon in the democratic legitimacy of the law-making acts, and of the convenience of a timely adoption of the distinction between legislative and non-legislative act as the summa division for the acts of the European Union.Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Downloads
Published
2011-03-04
Issue
Section
STUDIES
License
Copyright
Submission of a manuscript to the RDCE implies having read and accepted the journal's editorial guidelines and instructions for authors. When a work is accepted for publication, it is understood that the author grants the RDCE exclusive rights of reproduction, distribution and, where appropriate, sale of his manuscript for exploitation in all countries of the world in printed version, as well as any other magnetic, optical and digital media.
Authors shall transfer the publishing rights of their manuscript to RDCE so that it may be disseminated and capitalised on Intranets, the Internet and any web portals and wireless devices that the publisher may decide, by placing it at the disposal of users so that the latter may consult it online and extract content from it, print it and/or download and save it. These activities must comply with the terms and conditions outlined on the website hosting the work. However, the RDCE authorises authors of papers published in the journal to include a copy of these papers, once published, on their personal websites and/or other open access digital repositories. Copies must include a specific mention of RDCE, citing the year and issue of the journal in which the article was published, and adding a link to the RDCE website(s).
A year after its publication, the works of the RDCE will be under the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-NoDerivative 4.0 International license (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which allows third parties to share the work as long as its author and its first publication is indicated, without the right to commercial exploitation and the elaboration of derivative works.
Plagiarism and scientific fraud
The publication of work that infringes on intellectual property rights is the sole responsibility of the authors, including any conflicts that may occur regarding infringement of copyright. This includes, most importantly, conflicts related to the commission of plagiarism and/or scientific fraud.
Practices constituting scientific plagiarism are as follows:
1. Presenting the work of others as your own.
2. Adopting words or ideas from other authors without due recognition.
3. Not using quotation marks or another distinctive format to distinguish literal quotations.
4. Giving incorrect information about the true source of a citation.
5. The paraphrasing of a source without mentioning the source.
6. Excessive paraphrasing, even if the source is mentioned.
Practices constituting scientific fraud are as follows:
1. Fabrication, falsification or omission of data and plagiarism.
2. Duplicate publication.
3. Conflicts of authorship.
Warning
Any breach of these Rules shall constitute a ground for rejection of the manuscript submitted.