European Union, FRONTEX and security in the maritime borders. Towards an European model of humanized security at sea?
Keywords:
Maritime borders, External borders, Border control, Maritime areas, Maritime security, Maritime safety, Humanized security, European Union law, FRONTEX, Human Rights, International humanitarian law, Law of the Sea, Illegal immigration, Sea migrants, RefugAbstract
The gradual abolition of internal borders in Europe according to the process of European integration has been giving rise to the need to set up an area of freedom, security and justice that gives meaning to a new community concept of the EU external border. Security is the central idea of this new concept projected with particular intensity in the southern maritime borders of the Union, the scene of the humanitarian tragedy involving the smuggling of migrants. The elements of humanitarian nature, historic, geographic extension and proximity, social inequality, economic imbalance, the increasing population pressure and high cost of media impact, introduces a problem that is really an extraordinary challenge for the EU. Community action in this area, mainly embodied by the FRONTEX Agency, is very difficult to articulate due to the complex net of agencies and national standards and international community to interact, causing it overlaps, gaps, but always with the conditioning of the State sovereignty, the only competent and ultimately responsible for the actions taken at the borders. The security approach prevailing in this area responds to the reason of State that derives from the projection of sovereignty over national borders, even to transcend international spaces and to the waters of third countries. The direct consequences for life, integrity and freedom of migrants have been tragic. However, more recent developments seem to suggest the idea of an emerging common model of humanized security at sea, according to the development of a «common maritime space of the EU» in status nascendi.Downloads
Issue
Section
STUDIES
License
Copyright
Submission of a manuscript to the RDCE implies having read and accepted the journal's editorial guidelines and instructions for authors. When a work is accepted for publication, it is understood that the author grants the RDCE exclusive rights of reproduction, distribution and, where appropriate, sale of his manuscript for exploitation in all countries of the world in printed version, as well as any other magnetic, optical and digital media.
Authors shall transfer the publishing rights of their manuscript to RDCE so that it may be disseminated and capitalised on Intranets, the Internet and any web portals and wireless devices that the publisher may decide, by placing it at the disposal of users so that the latter may consult it online and extract content from it, print it and/or download and save it. These activities must comply with the terms and conditions outlined on the website hosting the work. However, the RDCE authorises authors of papers published in the journal to include a copy of these papers, once published, on their personal websites and/or other open access digital repositories. Copies must include a specific mention of RDCE, citing the year and issue of the journal in which the article was published, and adding a link to the RDCE website(s).
A year after its publication, the works of the RDCE will be under the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-NoDerivative 4.0 International license (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which allows third parties to share the work as long as its author and its first publication is indicated, without the right to commercial exploitation and the elaboration of derivative works.
Plagiarism and scientific fraud
The publication of work that infringes on intellectual property rights is the sole responsibility of the authors, including any conflicts that may occur regarding infringement of copyright. This includes, most importantly, conflicts related to the commission of plagiarism and/or scientific fraud.
Practices constituting scientific plagiarism are as follows:
1. Presenting the work of others as your own.
2. Adopting words or ideas from other authors without due recognition.
3. Not using quotation marks or another distinctive format to distinguish literal quotations.
4. Giving incorrect information about the true source of a citation.
5. The paraphrasing of a source without mentioning the source.
6. Excessive paraphrasing, even if the source is mentioned.
Practices constituting scientific fraud are as follows:
1. Fabrication, falsification or omission of data and plagiarism.
2. Duplicate publication.
3. Conflicts of authorship.
Warning
Any breach of these Rules shall constitute a ground for rejection of the manuscript submitted.