ECJ – Judgment of 15.11.2011 (Grand Chamber), M. Dereci e.a. V. Bundesministerium Für Inneres, C-256/11 – «Citizenship of the Union – Right of citizens of the Union and their family members to move an reside freely – citizen of the Union residing in the S
Keywords:
Citizenship of the Union, denial of the genuine enjoyment, fundamental right to family life, purely internal situations, third country nationals, Association Agreement with Turkey, standstill clausesAbstract
In Dereci the ECJ confirms the doctrine based on the privation of the genuine enjoyment of the substance of the rights conferred by virtue of his status as a citizen of the Union. At the same time, it ratifies its exceptional character not being sufficient to justify a simple economic convenience or the preference of the citizen for living with her family in the territory of the Union. At the same time, the ECJ grants a wide discretion to national judges to concrete this controversial application, bearing in mind that still seems to suffer from uncertainty. This is especially the case either about the question on when should be considered that a citizen must leave the Union territory or the relationships between this doctrine and the fundamental right to family life. Contrary to the enigmatic silence about his fundamental right in Ruiz Zambrano and McCarthy, this relationship is one of the main contributions of this judgement. To solve this question the ECJ designs an apparently harmonious demarcation of protection areas. Nevertheless, this evolution is not sufficient to eliminate the phenomenon of reverse discrimination, remaining therefore a certain feeling of discrimination for static European citizens. Probably, this only will be possible be means of a more determined political will by Members States.Downloads
Issue
Section
CASE LAW COURT OF JUSTICE OF THE EU
License
Copyright
Submission of a manuscript to the RDCE implies having read and accepted the journal's editorial guidelines and instructions for authors. When a work is accepted for publication, it is understood that the author grants the RDCE exclusive rights of reproduction, distribution and, where appropriate, sale of his manuscript for exploitation in all countries of the world in printed version, as well as any other magnetic, optical and digital media.
Authors shall transfer the publishing rights of their manuscript to RDCE so that it may be disseminated and capitalised on Intranets, the Internet and any web portals and wireless devices that the publisher may decide, by placing it at the disposal of users so that the latter may consult it online and extract content from it, print it and/or download and save it. These activities must comply with the terms and conditions outlined on the website hosting the work. However, the RDCE authorises authors of papers published in the journal to include a copy of these papers, once published, on their personal websites and/or other open access digital repositories. Copies must include a specific mention of RDCE, citing the year and issue of the journal in which the article was published, and adding a link to the RDCE website(s).
A year after its publication, the works of the RDCE will be under the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-NoDerivative 4.0 International license (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which allows third parties to share the work as long as its author and its first publication is indicated, without the right to commercial exploitation and the elaboration of derivative works.
Plagiarism and scientific fraud
The publication of work that infringes on intellectual property rights is the sole responsibility of the authors, including any conflicts that may occur regarding infringement of copyright. This includes, most importantly, conflicts related to the commission of plagiarism and/or scientific fraud.
Practices constituting scientific plagiarism are as follows:
1. Presenting the work of others as your own.
2. Adopting words or ideas from other authors without due recognition.
3. Not using quotation marks or another distinctive format to distinguish literal quotations.
4. Giving incorrect information about the true source of a citation.
5. The paraphrasing of a source without mentioning the source.
6. Excessive paraphrasing, even if the source is mentioned.
Practices constituting scientific fraud are as follows:
1. Fabrication, falsification or omission of data and plagiarism.
2. Duplicate publication.
3. Conflicts of authorship.
Warning
Any breach of these Rules shall constitute a ground for rejection of the manuscript submitted.