The accession of the European Union to the Rome Convention. Compliance with the European Convention on Human Rights obligations within the European Union legal order
Keywords:
Fundamental rights protection in the EU, European Union accession to the ECHR, International responsibility of the EU, Execution of judgments of the ECtHR, Loyal cooperationAbstract
The opening of the negotiations for the EU’s accession to the ECHR under the Lisbon Treaty has revealed many technical and legal challenges and obstacles which pave the way for a long process probably involving the prior opinion of the CJEU. In June 2011 a Draft of legal instruments on the accession of the European Union to the ECHR was adopted following the Council of Europe-EU negotiations. One year after, in June 2012, its content has been taken as a first step for the beginning of a second period of negotiations. This article analyzes some aspects of the Draft of legal instruments as, for instance, the co-respondent mechanism; taking into account its design and imperfections some rules are proposed for the division of the international responsibility stemming from the ECHR among the EU and its Member States. Furthermore, some aspects of the principle of loyal cooperation regarding the execution of the ECHR as a mixed agreement are described. It can be foretold that the ECHR is an international agreement that has no parallel and that it will bring relevant changes to the material and institutional features of the EU legal order. Accession may overcome the material limits inherent to the judicial review regarding fundamental rights in several areas of the EU legal order where the jurisdiction of the CJEU is restricted; moreover, accession will complete the available judicial remedies of this legal order. Finally, the hypothetical violations to the rights enshrined under the ECHR occasioned by EU institutions will no longer be attributed to its Member States, but to the EU itself.Downloads
Issue
Section
STUDIES
License
Copyright
Submission of a manuscript to the RDCE implies having read and accepted the journal's editorial guidelines and instructions for authors. When a work is accepted for publication, it is understood that the author grants the RDCE exclusive rights of reproduction, distribution and, where appropriate, sale of his manuscript for exploitation in all countries of the world in printed version, as well as any other magnetic, optical and digital media.
Authors shall transfer the publishing rights of their manuscript to RDCE so that it may be disseminated and capitalised on Intranets, the Internet and any web portals and wireless devices that the publisher may decide, by placing it at the disposal of users so that the latter may consult it online and extract content from it, print it and/or download and save it. These activities must comply with the terms and conditions outlined on the website hosting the work. However, the RDCE authorises authors of papers published in the journal to include a copy of these papers, once published, on their personal websites and/or other open access digital repositories. Copies must include a specific mention of RDCE, citing the year and issue of the journal in which the article was published, and adding a link to the RDCE website(s).
A year after its publication, the works of the RDCE will be under the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-NoDerivative 4.0 International license (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which allows third parties to share the work as long as its author and its first publication is indicated, without the right to commercial exploitation and the elaboration of derivative works.
Plagiarism and scientific fraud
The publication of work that infringes on intellectual property rights is the sole responsibility of the authors, including any conflicts that may occur regarding infringement of copyright. This includes, most importantly, conflicts related to the commission of plagiarism and/or scientific fraud.
Practices constituting scientific plagiarism are as follows:
1. Presenting the work of others as your own.
2. Adopting words or ideas from other authors without due recognition.
3. Not using quotation marks or another distinctive format to distinguish literal quotations.
4. Giving incorrect information about the true source of a citation.
5. The paraphrasing of a source without mentioning the source.
6. Excessive paraphrasing, even if the source is mentioned.
Practices constituting scientific fraud are as follows:
1. Fabrication, falsification or omission of data and plagiarism.
2. Duplicate publication.
3. Conflicts of authorship.
Warning
Any breach of these Rules shall constitute a ground for rejection of the manuscript submitted.