The Common Security and Defence Policy of the European Union and its relations with the United Nations: continuity or change after the Lisbon Treaty?
Keywords:
European External Action, Common Foreign and Security Policy, Common Security and Defence Policy, United Nations, Crisis Management, Civil and Military Capacities, Treaty of LisbonAbstract
Twenty years ago, the European Union started intervening in crisis and conflict management, and also in international crises, with more or less success. If this contribution has focused specially in strengths, more than in weaknesses, those exist too. These realistic premises have to be taken as an origin if the collaboration framework with the United Nations is to be reinforced. The planning and deployment of missions have not always been made as would be expected from an organization that aspires to play an important role as an «international global actor». From this perspective, the Treaty of Lisbon provides the EU with some new elements, such as the European External Action Service, that could contribute to a more global and integrated approach of crises management, concept that is also shared by the United Nations. However, it is also true that the Treaty of Lisbon leaves untouched the sovereign competences in the subject, and also that global approach requieres some specific capacities that are not well developed in the EU, such as command systems, communication and control, strategic information, surveillance and protection of troops, strategic transportation, etc. Therefore, it is evident that those capacities need to be reinforced if collaboration with the United Nations is to become believable and effective.Downloads
Issue
Section
STUDIES
License
Copyright
Submission of a manuscript to the RDCE implies having read and accepted the journal's editorial guidelines and instructions for authors. When a work is accepted for publication, it is understood that the author grants the RDCE exclusive rights of reproduction, distribution and, where appropriate, sale of his manuscript for exploitation in all countries of the world in printed version, as well as any other magnetic, optical and digital media.
Authors shall transfer the publishing rights of their manuscript to RDCE so that it may be disseminated and capitalised on Intranets, the Internet and any web portals and wireless devices that the publisher may decide, by placing it at the disposal of users so that the latter may consult it online and extract content from it, print it and/or download and save it. These activities must comply with the terms and conditions outlined on the website hosting the work. However, the RDCE authorises authors of papers published in the journal to include a copy of these papers, once published, on their personal websites and/or other open access digital repositories. Copies must include a specific mention of RDCE, citing the year and issue of the journal in which the article was published, and adding a link to the RDCE website(s).
A year after its publication, the works of the RDCE will be under the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-NoDerivative 4.0 International license (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which allows third parties to share the work as long as its author and its first publication is indicated, without the right to commercial exploitation and the elaboration of derivative works.
Plagiarism and scientific fraud
The publication of work that infringes on intellectual property rights is the sole responsibility of the authors, including any conflicts that may occur regarding infringement of copyright. This includes, most importantly, conflicts related to the commission of plagiarism and/or scientific fraud.
Practices constituting scientific plagiarism are as follows:
1. Presenting the work of others as your own.
2. Adopting words or ideas from other authors without due recognition.
3. Not using quotation marks or another distinctive format to distinguish literal quotations.
4. Giving incorrect information about the true source of a citation.
5. The paraphrasing of a source without mentioning the source.
6. Excessive paraphrasing, even if the source is mentioned.
Practices constituting scientific fraud are as follows:
1. Fabrication, falsification or omission of data and plagiarism.
2. Duplicate publication.
3. Conflicts of authorship.
Warning
Any breach of these Rules shall constitute a ground for rejection of the manuscript submitted.