ECJ Judgment of 22.06.2010 (Grand Chamber) Aziz Melki and Sélim Abdeli, C-188/10 and C-189/10 – «Article 67 TFEU – Freedom of movement for persons – Abolition of border control at internal borders – National legislation authorizing identity checks 20 kilo
Keywords:
Schengen Borders Code, crossing internal borders, border control, freedom of movement, third-country nationalsAbstract
In this Judgement the Court deals, on one hand, with the relationship between jurisdictions, and on the other hand, whether the police identity checks, carried out in areas near internal borders, are in keeping with Schengen Borders Code. The Court proceeds to point out, in a casuistry way, the elements which permit to distinguish a border control over a police check and prevents this last one from having an equivalent effect. The Court specifies the cases in which admits controls limiting the discretion of the States and, with that, it widens the scope of the freedom of movement.Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Downloads
How to Cite
Illamola Dausà, M. (2015). ECJ Judgment of 22.06.2010 (Grand Chamber) Aziz Melki and Sélim Abdeli, C-188/10 and C-189/10 – «Article 67 TFEU – Freedom of movement for persons – Abolition of border control at internal borders – National legislation authorizing identity checks 20 kilo. Revista De Derecho Comunitario Europeo, (41), 205–220. Retrieved from https://recyt.fecyt.es/index.php/RDCE/article/view/39504
Issue
Section
CASE LAW COURT OF JUSTICE OF THE EU
License
Copyright
Submission of a manuscript to the RDCE implies having read and accepted the journal's editorial guidelines and instructions for authors. When a work is accepted for publication, it is understood that the author grants the RDCE exclusive rights of reproduction, distribution and, where appropriate, sale of his manuscript for exploitation in all countries of the world in printed version, as well as any other magnetic, optical and digital media.
Authors shall transfer the publishing rights of their manuscript to RDCE so that it may be disseminated and capitalised on Intranets, the Internet and any web portals and wireless devices that the publisher may decide, by placing it at the disposal of users so that the latter may consult it online and extract content from it, print it and/or download and save it. These activities must comply with the terms and conditions outlined on the website hosting the work. However, the RDCE authorises authors of papers published in the journal to include a copy of these papers, once published, on their personal websites and/or other open access digital repositories. Copies must include a specific mention of RDCE, citing the year and issue of the journal in which the article was published, and adding a link to the RDCE website(s).
A year after its publication, the works of the RDCE will be under the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-NoDerivative 4.0 International license (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which allows third parties to share the work as long as its author and its first publication is indicated, without the right to commercial exploitation and the elaboration of derivative works.
Plagiarism and scientific fraud
The publication of work that infringes on intellectual property rights is the sole responsibility of the authors, including any conflicts that may occur regarding infringement of copyright. This includes, most importantly, conflicts related to the commission of plagiarism and/or scientific fraud.
Practices constituting scientific plagiarism are as follows:
1. Presenting the work of others as your own.
2. Adopting words or ideas from other authors without due recognition.
3. Not using quotation marks or another distinctive format to distinguish literal quotations.
4. Giving incorrect information about the true source of a citation.
5. The paraphrasing of a source without mentioning the source.
6. Excessive paraphrasing, even if the source is mentioned.
Practices constituting scientific fraud are as follows:
1. Fabrication, falsification or omission of data and plagiarism.
2. Duplicate publication.
3. Conflicts of authorship.
Warning
Any breach of these Rules shall constitute a ground for rejection of the manuscript submitted.
