Eurojust, at the forefront of judicial cooperation in criminal matters in the European Union
Keywords:
Cooperación judicial en materia penal, Eurojust, reuniones operativas, conflictos de jurisdicción, Equipos Conjuntos de Investigación, acuerdos de cooperación, Red Judicial Europea, Europol, OLAF, cooperación con terceros Estados, Fiscalía EuropeaAbstract
The realisation of an actual European judicial area within the framework of freedom, security and justice without internal borders the Union must offer its citizens requires the adoption of structural measures intended to ease the coordination of judicial inquiries and proceedings of the Member States. To such purpose, a third-generation body has been added to the practice of exchanging liaison magistrates and the European Judicial Network, Eurojust, which on account of its structure and functions it is being consolidated as the main actor in judicial cooperation in criminal matters in the European Union.The tool enabling a better appreciation of the work developed by Eurojust is the fact of holding operational meetings, where the different competent authorities from the Member States involved, or even, from third countries or bodies such as Europol or OLAF can exchange information and evidences directly, coordinate simultaneous operations in different countries, and evaluate the advisability of creating a joint investigation team or search a more efficient solution to a certain jurisdiction conflict. In order to achieve the maximum efficiency out of this work carried out by Eurojust —and, in general, of the fight against cross-border crime— cooperation and coordination relationships have been created and consolidated between Eurojust and the main actors of judicial cooperation in crime matters and the fight against organized crime in the Union, as well as with third countries and bodies, with unquestionably positive results.
In the immediate future, the consolidation of Eurojust’s role developing its whole potential is a priority, so that the idea of creating a European Public Prosecutor’s Office starting from Eurojust can be resumed in a second momentum, in accordance with Article 86 of the TFEU, still a far away possibility.
Downloads
Issue
Section
STUDIES
License
Copyright
Submission of a manuscript to the RDCE implies having read and accepted the journal's editorial guidelines and instructions for authors. When a work is accepted for publication, it is understood that the author grants the RDCE exclusive rights of reproduction, distribution and, where appropriate, sale of his manuscript for exploitation in all countries of the world in printed version, as well as any other magnetic, optical and digital media.
Authors shall transfer the publishing rights of their manuscript to RDCE so that it may be disseminated and capitalised on Intranets, the Internet and any web portals and wireless devices that the publisher may decide, by placing it at the disposal of users so that the latter may consult it online and extract content from it, print it and/or download and save it. These activities must comply with the terms and conditions outlined on the website hosting the work. However, the RDCE authorises authors of papers published in the journal to include a copy of these papers, once published, on their personal websites and/or other open access digital repositories. Copies must include a specific mention of RDCE, citing the year and issue of the journal in which the article was published, and adding a link to the RDCE website(s).
A year after its publication, the works of the RDCE will be under the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-NoDerivative 4.0 International license (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which allows third parties to share the work as long as its author and its first publication is indicated, without the right to commercial exploitation and the elaboration of derivative works.
Plagiarism and scientific fraud
The publication of work that infringes on intellectual property rights is the sole responsibility of the authors, including any conflicts that may occur regarding infringement of copyright. This includes, most importantly, conflicts related to the commission of plagiarism and/or scientific fraud.
Practices constituting scientific plagiarism are as follows:
1. Presenting the work of others as your own.
2. Adopting words or ideas from other authors without due recognition.
3. Not using quotation marks or another distinctive format to distinguish literal quotations.
4. Giving incorrect information about the true source of a citation.
5. The paraphrasing of a source without mentioning the source.
6. Excessive paraphrasing, even if the source is mentioned.
Practices constituting scientific fraud are as follows:
1. Fabrication, falsification or omission of data and plagiarism.
2. Duplicate publication.
3. Conflicts of authorship.
Warning
Any breach of these Rules shall constitute a ground for rejection of the manuscript submitted.