CJUE – Judgment of 13.02.2014, Svensson and Others, Case C-466/12 – «Reference for a preliminary ruling – Approximation of laws – Copyright and related rights – Directive 2001/29/EC – Information society – Harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and
Keywords:
Directive 2001/29/CE, Hiperlinks, public communication, copyright, Intellectual PropertyAbstract
This article analyzes the Decision dated on 13.02.2014 (C-466/12) where the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) deals with Internet links which connect to another website containing content of free access but protected by copyright. The CJEU understands that it´s legal considering that there are not new audiences, so that the link does not constitute an act of communication to the public and, therefore, does not require any permission from the authors. The recipients of the original public communication were all the potential users of the webpage, because of all Internet users could freely access to that webpage and they knew that the access to the works on that webpage was not subject to any restrictive measures. Accordingly, as the public wasn´t new, it was not required any approval nor authorization and, therefore, there was no copyright infringement. The Court considers irrelevant that the webpage of the defendants did not specify that the information came from another webpage. However, it would be an infringement if the webpage avoid the restrictive measures taken by the page containing the protected work. However, we think that some grounds of the Court’s judgment clearly contravene the Directive 2001/29/EC, due the link does not transmit the work, it just informs about the place where the work is. Without transmission of the work, there is not act of communication.Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Downloads
How to Cite
Sánchez Rodríguez, A. J. (2015). CJUE – Judgment of 13.02.2014, Svensson and Others, Case C-466/12 – «Reference for a preliminary ruling – Approximation of laws – Copyright and related rights – Directive 2001/29/EC – Information society – Harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and. Revista De Derecho Comunitario Europeo, (48), 623–638. Retrieved from https://recyt.fecyt.es/index.php/RDCE/article/view/39259
Issue
Section
CASE LAW COURT OF JUSTICE OF THE EU
License
Copyright
Submission of a manuscript to the RDCE implies having read and accepted the journal's editorial guidelines and instructions for authors. When a work is accepted for publication, it is understood that the author grants the RDCE exclusive rights of reproduction, distribution and, where appropriate, sale of his manuscript for exploitation in all countries of the world in printed version, as well as any other magnetic, optical and digital media.
Authors shall transfer the publishing rights of their manuscript to RDCE so that it may be disseminated and capitalised on Intranets, the Internet and any web portals and wireless devices that the publisher may decide, by placing it at the disposal of users so that the latter may consult it online and extract content from it, print it and/or download and save it. These activities must comply with the terms and conditions outlined on the website hosting the work. However, the RDCE authorises authors of papers published in the journal to include a copy of these papers, once published, on their personal websites and/or other open access digital repositories. Copies must include a specific mention of RDCE, citing the year and issue of the journal in which the article was published, and adding a link to the RDCE website(s).
A year after its publication, the works of the RDCE will be under the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-NoDerivative 4.0 International license (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which allows third parties to share the work as long as its author and its first publication is indicated, without the right to commercial exploitation and the elaboration of derivative works.
Plagiarism and scientific fraud
The publication of work that infringes on intellectual property rights is the sole responsibility of the authors, including any conflicts that may occur regarding infringement of copyright. This includes, most importantly, conflicts related to the commission of plagiarism and/or scientific fraud.
Practices constituting scientific plagiarism are as follows:
1. Presenting the work of others as your own.
2. Adopting words or ideas from other authors without due recognition.
3. Not using quotation marks or another distinctive format to distinguish literal quotations.
4. Giving incorrect information about the true source of a citation.
5. The paraphrasing of a source without mentioning the source.
6. Excessive paraphrasing, even if the source is mentioned.
Practices constituting scientific fraud are as follows:
1. Fabrication, falsification or omission of data and plagiarism.
2. Duplicate publication.
3. Conflicts of authorship.
Warning
Any breach of these Rules shall constitute a ground for rejection of the manuscript submitted.