The participation of the Parliament of Catalonia in the implementation and control of the principle of subsidiary
Keywords:
Principle of subsidiarity. Parliament of Catalonia. Regional parliaments with legislative powers. National parliaments. Cortes Generales. Congress Senate Joint Commission for the EU. Early warning procedure. Treaty of Lisbon. Protocol No. 2 on the implemeAbstract
he purpose of this study was to evaluate, from a legal perspective, the performance of the Parliament of Catalonia in the field of implementation and monitoring of the subsidiarity principle in relation to legislative proposals of the European Union. Thework is divided into two parts. In the first part reviews the legal basis, internal procedural aspects and the various participation procedures used by Parliament in this context: Network monitoring the principle of subsidiarity of the Committee of the Regions, pilot testing of the COSAC on the control of subsidiarity and the early warning procedure. In this sense, it aims to expose the practices carried out and identify some limits that have prevented a more effective parliamentary involvement. It also includes an approach to the content of the principle of subsidiarity within the EU to the extent that it limits the scope of parliamentary involvement. The second part aims, just, raise some general considerations that might allow the author’s opinion, improving the effectiveness and enhancing the chances of parliamentary participation in the framework of the implementation and monitoring of the principle of subsidiarity and from a broader perspective, the EU system.Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Downloads
How to Cite
Palomares Amat, M. (2015). The participation of the Parliament of Catalonia in the implementation and control of the principle of subsidiary. Revista De Derecho Comunitario Europeo, (38), 19–58. Retrieved from https://recyt.fecyt.es/index.php/RDCE/article/view/39423
Issue
Section
STUDIES
License
Copyright
Submission of a manuscript to the RDCE implies having read and accepted the journal's editorial guidelines and instructions for authors. When a work is accepted for publication, it is understood that the author grants the RDCE exclusive rights of reproduction, distribution and, where appropriate, sale of his manuscript for exploitation in all countries of the world in printed version, as well as any other magnetic, optical and digital media.
Authors shall transfer the publishing rights of their manuscript to RDCE so that it may be disseminated and capitalised on Intranets, the Internet and any web portals and wireless devices that the publisher may decide, by placing it at the disposal of users so that the latter may consult it online and extract content from it, print it and/or download and save it. These activities must comply with the terms and conditions outlined on the website hosting the work. However, the RDCE authorises authors of papers published in the journal to include a copy of these papers, once published, on their personal websites and/or other open access digital repositories. Copies must include a specific mention of RDCE, citing the year and issue of the journal in which the article was published, and adding a link to the RDCE website(s).
A year after its publication, the works of the RDCE will be under the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-NoDerivative 4.0 International license (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which allows third parties to share the work as long as its author and its first publication is indicated, without the right to commercial exploitation and the elaboration of derivative works.
Plagiarism and scientific fraud
The publication of work that infringes on intellectual property rights is the sole responsibility of the authors, including any conflicts that may occur regarding infringement of copyright. This includes, most importantly, conflicts related to the commission of plagiarism and/or scientific fraud.
Practices constituting scientific plagiarism are as follows:
1. Presenting the work of others as your own.
2. Adopting words or ideas from other authors without due recognition.
3. Not using quotation marks or another distinctive format to distinguish literal quotations.
4. Giving incorrect information about the true source of a citation.
5. The paraphrasing of a source without mentioning the source.
6. Excessive paraphrasing, even if the source is mentioned.
Practices constituting scientific fraud are as follows:
1. Fabrication, falsification or omission of data and plagiarism.
2. Duplicate publication.
3. Conflicts of authorship.
Warning
Any breach of these Rules shall constitute a ground for rejection of the manuscript submitted.
