ECJ – Judgment of 18.12.2007, United Kingdom / Council, C-77/2005 – Creation of Frontex – Validity – United Kingdom exclusion – Schengen acquis and Protocol—
Keywords:
Area of Freedom, Security and Justice – Control of Persons at External Borders – New Measures that constitute a Development of the Schengen Acquis – Regulation establishing the Frontex Agency – United Kingdom Exclusion.Abstract
Regulation No 2007/2004 establishing the Frontex Agency was worked out without the cooperation of the United Kingdom, eventhough this Member State asked to participate. In this Decision, the ECJ argues against the annulment of the Regulation, even if the United Kingdom had been excluded, because it would be a new measure developing the Schengen acquis and the United Kingdom hadn't accepted to cooperate in the scope of that acquis affected. This way, the ECJ favors the subordinacy between article 5 and article 4 of the Schengen Protocol and rejects the so-called «independence thesis» defended by the United Kingdom.Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Downloads
Published
2010-02-24
How to Cite
LAURA GARCÍA GUTIÉRREZ. (2010). ECJ – Judgment of 18.12.2007, United Kingdom / Council, C-77/2005 – Creation of Frontex – Validity – United Kingdom exclusion – Schengen acquis and Protocol—. Revista De Derecho Comunitario Europeo, (34). Retrieved from https://recyt.fecyt.es/index.php/RDCE/article/view/46027
Issue
Section
CASE LAW COURT OF JUSTICE OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES
License
Copyright
Submission of a manuscript to the RDCE implies having read and accepted the journal's editorial guidelines and instructions for authors. When a work is accepted for publication, it is understood that the author grants the RDCE exclusive rights of reproduction, distribution and, where appropriate, sale of his manuscript for exploitation in all countries of the world in printed version, as well as any other magnetic, optical and digital media.
Authors shall transfer the publishing rights of their manuscript to RDCE so that it may be disseminated and capitalised on Intranets, the Internet and any web portals and wireless devices that the publisher may decide, by placing it at the disposal of users so that the latter may consult it online and extract content from it, print it and/or download and save it. These activities must comply with the terms and conditions outlined on the website hosting the work. However, the RDCE authorises authors of papers published in the journal to include a copy of these papers, once published, on their personal websites and/or other open access digital repositories. Copies must include a specific mention of RDCE, citing the year and issue of the journal in which the article was published, and adding a link to the RDCE website(s).
A year after its publication, the works of the RDCE will be under the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-NoDerivative 4.0 International license (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which allows third parties to share the work as long as its author and its first publication is indicated, without the right to commercial exploitation and the elaboration of derivative works.
Plagiarism and scientific fraud
The publication of work that infringes on intellectual property rights is the sole responsibility of the authors, including any conflicts that may occur regarding infringement of copyright. This includes, most importantly, conflicts related to the commission of plagiarism and/or scientific fraud.
Practices constituting scientific plagiarism are as follows:
1. Presenting the work of others as your own.
2. Adopting words or ideas from other authors without due recognition.
3. Not using quotation marks or another distinctive format to distinguish literal quotations.
4. Giving incorrect information about the true source of a citation.
5. The paraphrasing of a source without mentioning the source.
6. Excessive paraphrasing, even if the source is mentioned.
Practices constituting scientific fraud are as follows:
1. Fabrication, falsification or omission of data and plagiarism.
2. Duplicate publication.
3. Conflicts of authorship.
Warning
Any breach of these Rules shall constitute a ground for rejection of the manuscript submitted.