The cross-border collection of DNA evidence in the European Union and its effects on Spain. The problem of the «familial (DNA) searches»
Keywords:
DNA Databases, lawfulness, reliability, «familial (DNA) searches», cross-border collection evidence, Decision 2008/615, procedural efficiencyAbstract
DNA evidence, as is currently considered, is not infallible. But, we accept that DNA and its police databases is a tool that has an enormous potential in the fight against cross-border and domestic serious crime. That potential is being achieved, on the one hand, due to the continuous scientific and technological advances, which are being used to improve the investigation of serious crimes, and, on the other, due to the increasing use of the probability calculations in the field of the assessment of evidences, particularly, scientific evidence. Some of these advances are being taken into account by the European and national legislator so that this legislation can allow the obtaining of expert DNA evidence that can be highly valued by national Court. Although reliable evidence can be obtained due to the above mentioned advances, these ones can impede the obtaining of lawful evidence, which will hinder, ultimately, the collection of admissible expert DNA evidence. Therefore, the European and national regulation, particularly Spanish legislation, has to fulfill two requirements: 1) if it allows for DNA evidence to be obtained as reliably as possible; 2) if it allows for DNA evidence to be lawfully obtained. And both requirements have to be met in the three phases that involved what I refer to as «the forensic use of the technology of DNA», namely, the phase 1) of collection of the DNA sample; 2) of analysis of the DNA profile in the laboratory and, 3) of processing of DNA data in a database.According to the exposed approach, it is necessary to explain what the meaning of lawfulness and reliability is and, also, to identify the intended purpose in each one of the three phases. Under this framework, we can identify and analyze the adopted regulations at EU level and its impact on Spanish Law. It will allow the analysis of the legal questions that impede the cross-border obtaining of effective DNA evidence. In this context, we are going to address the advisability of a regulation, at European Union level and also in the legal systems of the Member States, of the «Familial (DNA) Searches» in the DNA databases and the lawfulness and reliability problems that this kind of search raises.
Downloads
Issue
Section
NOTES
License
Copyright
Submission of a manuscript to the RDCE implies having read and accepted the journal's editorial guidelines and instructions for authors. When a work is accepted for publication, it is understood that the author grants the RDCE exclusive rights of reproduction, distribution and, where appropriate, sale of his manuscript for exploitation in all countries of the world in printed version, as well as any other magnetic, optical and digital media.
Authors shall transfer the publishing rights of their manuscript to RDCE so that it may be disseminated and capitalised on Intranets, the Internet and any web portals and wireless devices that the publisher may decide, by placing it at the disposal of users so that the latter may consult it online and extract content from it, print it and/or download and save it. These activities must comply with the terms and conditions outlined on the website hosting the work. However, the RDCE authorises authors of papers published in the journal to include a copy of these papers, once published, on their personal websites and/or other open access digital repositories. Copies must include a specific mention of RDCE, citing the year and issue of the journal in which the article was published, and adding a link to the RDCE website(s).
A year after its publication, the works of the RDCE will be under the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-NoDerivative 4.0 International license (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which allows third parties to share the work as long as its author and its first publication is indicated, without the right to commercial exploitation and the elaboration of derivative works.
Plagiarism and scientific fraud
The publication of work that infringes on intellectual property rights is the sole responsibility of the authors, including any conflicts that may occur regarding infringement of copyright. This includes, most importantly, conflicts related to the commission of plagiarism and/or scientific fraud.
Practices constituting scientific plagiarism are as follows:
1. Presenting the work of others as your own.
2. Adopting words or ideas from other authors without due recognition.
3. Not using quotation marks or another distinctive format to distinguish literal quotations.
4. Giving incorrect information about the true source of a citation.
5. The paraphrasing of a source without mentioning the source.
6. Excessive paraphrasing, even if the source is mentioned.
Practices constituting scientific fraud are as follows:
1. Fabrication, falsification or omission of data and plagiarism.
2. Duplicate publication.
3. Conflicts of authorship.
Warning
Any breach of these Rules shall constitute a ground for rejection of the manuscript submitted.