ECJ – Judgment of 16.10.2007, Palacios de la Villa, C-411/05 – Compulsory retirement provided for collective agreement and age discrimination
Keywords:
Age discrimination, compulsory retirement, collective agreement, termination of employment contract.Abstract
This article places the ruling by the European Court of Justice in Palacios de la Villa case in the context of the European Case-law for age discrimination. Though the competence conferred of the Members States to determine the retirement age does not meet affected by the Directive 2000/78/CE, the community norm can be applied to the national measures governing the termination of employment contracts when the normal retirement age has been reached. The prohibition of any discrimination on grounds of age not precluding the clauses contained in collective agreements protected for the single transitional provision of the Law 14/2005 because the regulation was adopted in the context of a national policy destined to promote the access to the employment. The measure cannot be regarded as unduly prejudicing the legitimate claims of workers, the relevant legislation is not based only on a specific age, but also takes account of the fact that the persons concerned are entitled to financial compensation by way of a retirement pension at end of their working life, the level of which cannot be regarded as unreasonable.Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Downloads
Published
2008-08-08
How to Cite
RAFAEL GÓMEZ GORDILLO. (2008). ECJ – Judgment of 16.10.2007, Palacios de la Villa, C-411/05 – Compulsory retirement provided for collective agreement and age discrimination. Revista De Derecho Comunitario Europeo, (30). Retrieved from https://recyt.fecyt.es/index.php/RDCE/article/view/46454
Issue
Section
CASE LAW COURT OF JUSTICE OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES
License
Copyright
Submission of a manuscript to the RDCE implies having read and accepted the journal's editorial guidelines and instructions for authors. When a work is accepted for publication, it is understood that the author grants the RDCE exclusive rights of reproduction, distribution and, where appropriate, sale of his manuscript for exploitation in all countries of the world in printed version, as well as any other magnetic, optical and digital media.
Authors shall transfer the publishing rights of their manuscript to RDCE so that it may be disseminated and capitalised on Intranets, the Internet and any web portals and wireless devices that the publisher may decide, by placing it at the disposal of users so that the latter may consult it online and extract content from it, print it and/or download and save it. These activities must comply with the terms and conditions outlined on the website hosting the work. However, the RDCE authorises authors of papers published in the journal to include a copy of these papers, once published, on their personal websites and/or other open access digital repositories. Copies must include a specific mention of RDCE, citing the year and issue of the journal in which the article was published, and adding a link to the RDCE website(s).
A year after its publication, the works of the RDCE will be under the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-NoDerivative 4.0 International license (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which allows third parties to share the work as long as its author and its first publication is indicated, without the right to commercial exploitation and the elaboration of derivative works.
Plagiarism and scientific fraud
The publication of work that infringes on intellectual property rights is the sole responsibility of the authors, including any conflicts that may occur regarding infringement of copyright. This includes, most importantly, conflicts related to the commission of plagiarism and/or scientific fraud.
Practices constituting scientific plagiarism are as follows:
1. Presenting the work of others as your own.
2. Adopting words or ideas from other authors without due recognition.
3. Not using quotation marks or another distinctive format to distinguish literal quotations.
4. Giving incorrect information about the true source of a citation.
5. The paraphrasing of a source without mentioning the source.
6. Excessive paraphrasing, even if the source is mentioned.
Practices constituting scientific fraud are as follows:
1. Fabrication, falsification or omission of data and plagiarism.
2. Duplicate publication.
3. Conflicts of authorship.
Warning
Any breach of these Rules shall constitute a ground for rejection of the manuscript submitted.