Validez y fiabilidad de la prueba de tenis de agilidad reactiva basada en tecnología (RATT) (Validity and reliability of technology-based reactive agility tennis test (RATT))

Autores/as

  • Rekyan Woro Mulaksito Mulyadi Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta https://orcid.org/0009-0001-6171-8396
  • Tomoliyus Tomoliyus Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta
  • Abdul Alim Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta
  • Cerika Rismayanthi Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta
  • Wisnu Nugroho Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta
  • Dima Krisna Wiedarjati Universitas Terbuka https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0680-3782
  • Wahyu Dwi Yulianto Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v60.107975

Palabras clave:

Validity, Reliability, Reactive Agility Test, Court Tennis Sports

Resumen

La capacidad reactiva forma parte de un importante componente biomotor en el tenis de campo que requiere una valoración más específica según las necesidades del deporte. El objetivo de este estudio es analizar la validez y fiabilidad de las pruebas de agilidad reactiva basadas en la tecnología deportiva de tenis de campo. Método: Este tipo de investigación es investigación y desarrollo (I&D), mediante el desarrollo de un instrumento de medición de la agilidad reactiva en el campo del tenis deportivo. Los sujetos del estudio se dividieron en cuatro grupos; El primero se basa en la revisión literaria de SINTA / revistas acreditadas internacionales, el segundo son siete expertos en evaluación deportiva, el tercero son practicantes / entrenadores con un total de 13 que han sido certificados en regiones y 78 atletas de tenis obtenidos de entrenadores, el cuarto son atletas de tenis obtenidos aleatoriamente con un total de 40 atletas. La técnica de recolección de datos utiliza una escala Likert, mientras que la técnica de análisis de datos utiliza la prueba de validez de Aiken V. Resultado: La investigación de construcción del instrumento de medición de tenis Reactive Agiltiy, tiene una buena validez de contenido con un valor V de 0.85. El valor de Coefident de correlación interclase (ICC) de 0,8 se clasifica como buena fiabilidad entre evaluadores. Conlusion: se han desarrollado resultados de validación de alto contenido y alta confiabilidad de pruebas entre contadores en la construcción de pruebas de agilidad reactiva basadas en tecnología para deportes de tenis de campo e instrumentos de medición de pruebas de agilidad reactiva para deportes de tenis de campo, que pueden ser utilizados por entrenadores para evaluar y entrenar las habilidades de los atletas de tenis de campo.

Palabras clave: Validez, Fiabilidad, Test de Agilidad Reactiva, Pista de Tenis Deportiva

Abstract. Background: Reactive agility ability is part of a vital motor component in tennis that requires a more specific assessment according to the needs of the sport. Aim: This study analyzed the validity and reliability of technology-based reactive agility tests on tennis. Method: It is a research and development (R&D) research, which involves developing a measuring instrument for a reactive agility tennis sports. The research subjects were divided into four groups; first, based on a literature review of SINTA/international accredited journals; second, seven sports evaluation experts; third, 13 certified practitioners/coaches and 78 tennis athletes obtained from coaches; fourth, 40 randomly obtained tennis athletes. The data collection technique used the Likert scale, while the data analysis technique used the Aiken V validation test. Reliability test used person product moment statistics. Results: Research on the construction of the tennis Reactive Agility measuring instrument has good content validity with a V value of 0.85, and the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) value of 0.8 is categorized as good inter-rater reliability. Conclusion: The results show high content validation and high inter-rater test reliability in the construction of technology-based reactive agility tests for tennis sports, and this developing reactive agility test instruments can be used by coaches to evaluate and train the ability of tennis athletes.

Keywords: Validity, Reliability, Reactive Agility Test, Court Tennis Sports

Citas

Aiken, L. R. (1985). Three coefficients for analyzing the reliability and validity of ratings. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 45(1), 131–142. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164485451012

Contreras-osorio F., Campos-jara C., Cristian M.-S., Chirosa-Rios L., Martinez-Garcia D. (2021). Effects of Sport-Based Interventions on Children’ s Executive Function: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Brain Sci, 11, 755. doi: 10.3390/brainsci11060755.

Contreras-Osorio F., Guzmán-Guzmán I.P., Cerda-Vega E., Chirosa-Ríos L., Ramírez-Campillo R., Campos-Jara C. (2022). Effects of the Type of Sports Practice on the Executive Functions of Schoolchildren. Int. J. Environ. Res. Pub-lic Health, 19, 3886. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19073886

Cox, G. R., Bailey, E., Jorm, A. F., Reavley, N. J., Templer, K., Parker, A., Rickwood, D., Bhar, S., & Robinson, J. (2016). Development of suicide postvention guidelines for secondary schools: A Delphi study. BMC Public Health, 16(1), 180. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-016-2822-6

Farrow, D., Young, W., & Bruce, & L. (n.d.). The development of a test of reactive agility for netball: a new methodol-ogy.

Fernandez, J., Mendez-Villanueva, A., & Pluim, B. M. (2006). Intensity of tennis match play. British journal of sports medicine, 40(5), 387-391.

Fernandez-Fernandez, J., Sanz, D., Sarabia, J. M., & Moya, M. (2017). The effects of sport-specific drills training or high-intensity interval training in young tennis players. International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance, 12(1), 90–98. https://doi.org/10.1123/ijspp.2015-0684

Ferrauti, A., Kinner, V., & Fernandez-Fernandez, J. (2011). The Hit & Turn Tennis Test: an acoustically controlled endurance test for tennis players. Journal of sports sciences, 29(5), 485-494.

Fleiss, J. L. (1975). Measuring agreement between two judges on the presence or absence of a trait. Biometrics, 31(3), 651. https://doi.org/10.2307/2529549

Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2012). How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education (Eighth Edi, Issue 1). McGraw-Hill.

Gabbett, T., & Benton, D. (2009). Reactive agility of rugby league players. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, 12(1), 212–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsams.2007.08.011

Gallo, T., Fidino, M., Lehrer, E. W., & Magle, S. B. (2017). Mammal diversity and metacommunity dynamics in urban green spaces: Implications for urban wildlife conservation. Ecological Applications, 27(8), 2330–2341. https://doi.org/10.1002/eap.1611

Girard, O., & Millet, G. P. (2009). Physical Determinants of Tennis Performance In Competitive Teenage Players. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181b3df89

Green, R. A. (2014). The Delphi technique in educational research. SAGE Open, 4(2), 215824401452977. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244014529773

Guilford, J. P. (1956). Fundamental statistics in psychology and education (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill.

Heilmann F., Weinberg H., Wollny R. (2022). The Impact of Practicing Open- vs. Closed-Skill Sports on Executive Functions-A Meta-Analytic and Systematic Review with a Focus on Characteristics of Sports. Brain Sci, 12, 1071. doi: 10.3390/brainsci12081071.

Hendryadi, H. (2017). Content validity: the initial stage of questionnaire development. Journal of Management and Business Research (JRMB) Faculty of Economics UNIAT, 2(2), 169-178. https://doi.org/10.36226/jrmb.v2i2.47

Hsu, C. C., & Sandford, B. A. (2007). The Delphi technique: making sense of consensus. Practical assessment, research, and evaluation, 12(1).

Inglis, P., & Bird, S. P. (2016). 62 Reactive agility tests-Review and practical applications. In Journal of Australian Strength and Conditioning, 24(5).

Ishihara T., Mizuno M. (2018). Effects of tennis play on executive function in 6–11- year-old children: A 12-month longitudinal study. Eur. J. Sport Sci. 18:741–752. doi: 10.1080/17461391.2018.1444792.

Ishihara T., Sugasawa S., Matsuda Y., Mizuno M. (2017). Improved executive functions in 6-12-year-old children fol-lowing cognitively engaging tennis lessons. J. Sports Sci, 35, 2014–2020. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2016.1250939.

Kilit, B., Arslan, E., & Soylu, Y. Veteran Tenis Oyuncularının Farklı Tenis Kortlarındaki Müsabakalarından Elde Edilen Fiziksel Aktiviteden Hoşlanma Düzeylerinin İncelenmesi. Onur Kurulu, 445.

Kolovelonis A., Goudas M. (2022). Acute enhancement of executive functions through cognitively challenging physical activity games in elementary physical education 2022. Eur. Phys. Educ, Rev. 1, 1–18. doi: 10.1177/1356336X221135139

Koo, T. K., & Li, M. Y. (2016). A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. J Chiropr Med, 15(2), 155-163. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcm.20 16.02.012.

Kovacs, M. S. (2007). Tennis Physiology Training the Competitive Athlete. In Sports Med, 37(3).

Munivrana, G., Jelaska, I., & Tomljanović, M. (2022). Design and Validation of a New Tennis-Specific Reactive agility Test—A Pilot Study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(16), 10039.

Nababan, V. A., & Sinulingga, A. (2021). The Effect of Groundstroke Training Using Targets on the Groundstroke Abil-ity of Court Tennis. Achievement Journal, 5(1). https://jurnal.unimed.ac.id/2012/index.php/jpsi/index

Paul, D.J.; Gabbett, T.J.; Nassis, G.P. (2016). Agility in team sports: Testing, training and factors affecting performance. Sports Med. 46, 421–442.

Pojskic, H., Pagaduan, J., Uzicanin, E., Separovic, V., Spasic, M., Foretic, N., & Sekulic, D. (2019). Validity and Useful-ness of a New Response Time Test for Agility-Based Sports: A Simple vs. Complex Motor Task. In ©Journal of Sports Science and Medicine, 18. http://www.jssm.org

Pueo, B., Penichet-Tomas, A., & Jimenez-Olmedo, J. M. (2020). Validity, reliability and usefulness of smartphone and kinovea motion analysis software for direct measurement of vertical jump height. Physiology & Behavior, 227, 113144.

Reid, M., & Duffield, R. (2014). The development of fatigue during match- play tennis. In British Journal of Sports Medi-cine, 48(1). https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2013-093196

Reid, M., & Schneiker, K. (2008). Strength and conditioning in tennis: current research and practice. Journal of Science and medicine in Sport, 11(3), 248-256.

Scanlan A.T., Tucker P.S., Dalbo V.J. (2014). A comparison of linear speed, closed- skill agility, and open-skill agility qualities between backcourt and frontcourt adult semiprofessional male basketball players. J. Strength Cond. Res. 28, 1319–1327.

Sheppard, J., & Young, W. (2006). Agility literature review: Classifications, training and testing. In Journal of Sports Scienc-es, 24(9), 919–932. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640410500457109

Tavakol, M., & Dennick, R. (2011). Making sense of Cronbach’s alpha. In International journal of medical education, 2, 53–55. https://doi.org/10.5116/ijme.4dfb.8dfd

Thiagarajan, S. Samuel.D.S & Semmel, Mi. (1974). Intructional Development for Training Teacher of Exeptional Chil-dren. Indiana: Indiana University Bloomington

Tomoliyus, T., & Sunardianta, R. (2020). Validitas dan reliabilitas instrumen tes reaktif agility tenis meja. Jurnal Keo-lahragaan, 8(2), 148-157.

Veale, J. P., Pearce, A. J., & Carlson, J. S. (2010). Reliability and Validity of a Reactive agility Test for Australian Football. In International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance, 5.

Wang J.G., Cai K., Liu Z., Herold F., Zou L., Zhu L., Xiong X., Chen A. (2020). Effects of mini-basketball training program on executive functions and core symptoms among preschool children with autism spectrum disorders. Brain Sci, 10, 263. doi: 10.3390/brainsci10050263.

Descargas

Publicado

2024-09-19

Cómo citar

Woro Mulaksito Mulyadi, R., Tomoliyus, T., Alim, A. ., Rismayanthi, C., Nugroho, W., Wiedarjati, D. K. ., & Yulianto, W. D. . (2024). Validez y fiabilidad de la prueba de tenis de agilidad reactiva basada en tecnología (RATT) (Validity and reliability of technology-based reactive agility tennis test (RATT)). Retos, 60, 534–538. https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v60.107975

Número

Sección

Artículos de carácter científico: trabajos de investigaciones básicas y/o aplicadas