Disputar la igualdad: marcos cognitivos y redes discursivas en el debate parlamentario sobre la Ley de Libertad Sexual en España
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21308/recp.70.02Palabras clave:
Igualdad de género, debates parlamentarios, discurso político, feminismo, violencia sexual, actores-antigénero, reforma legalResumen
Este artículo analiza las dinámicas discursivas del debate parlamentario en torno a la Ley Orgánica de Garantía Integral de la Libertad Sexual, conocida como la “Ley del Solo Sí es Sí”, aprobada en España en 2022. El objetivo es identificar los marcos cognitivos movilizados por los actores políticos para apoyar o rechazar la ley, y mapear los significados normativos en disputa sobre la igualdad de género. A partir de un enfoque metodológico mixto, que combina análisis temático y de redes discursivas, el estudio explora las dimensiones sustantivas del debate y la estructura relacional de las interacciones entre los partidos. Los resultados muestran que el debate parlamentario se estructura en torno a tres dimensiones analíticas diferenciadas. Una dimensión democrática, movilizada predominantemente por el Gobierno y los actores que respaldan el proyecto legislativo; una dimensión jurídica, articulada en torno al marco del consentimiento, que actúa como nodo bisagra y es empleada tanto por actores favorables como contrarios a la iniciativa; y una dimensión cultural-ideológica, movilizada principalmente por Vox, actor anti-género, que a pesar de estar aislado retóricamente, ocupa una posición central en la estructura relacional del debate, al convertirse en el principal antagonista en torno al cual se organizan dinámicas de confrontación.
Descargas
Citas
Almanssori, S., & Stanley, M. (2022). Public pedagogy on sexual violence: A feminist discourse analysis of YouTube vlogs after #MeToo. Journal of Curriculum and Pedagogy, 19(3), 254-277. https://doi.org/10.1080/15505170.2021.1895382
Anderson, I., & Doherty, K. (2007). Accounting for rape: Psychology, feminism and discourse analysis in the study of sexual violence. Routledge.
Annus, I. (2014). The Ruling Discourse on Proper Womanhood in the Hungarian Parliament. International Studies. Interdisciplinary Political and Cultural Journal, 16(1), 5-20. https://doi.org/10.2478/ipcj-2014-0001
Banet-Weiser, S. (2018). Empowered: Popular feminism and popular misogyny. Duke University Press.
Bansal, M., Cardie, C., & Lee, L. (2008). The power of negative thinking: Exploiting label disagreement in the min-cut classification framework. COLING 2008: Companion Volume: Posters, 15-18. https://aclanthology.org/C08-2004.pdf
Borgatti, S. P., Everett, M. G., Johnson, J. C., & Agneessens, F. (2022). Analyzing social networks using R. Sage.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Brin, S., & Page, L. (1998). The anatomy of a large-scale hypertextual web search engine. Computer networks and ISDN systems, 30(1-7), 107-117.
Burford, C., Bird, S., & Baldwin, T. (2015). Collective document classification with implicit inter-document semantic relationships. Proceedings of the fourth joint conference on lexical and computational semantics, 106-116. https://aclanthology.org/S15-1012.pdf
Burfoot, C. (2008). Using multiple sources of agreement information for sentiment classification of political transcripts. Proceedings of the Australasian language technology association workshop 2008, 11-18. https://aclanthology.org/U08-1003.pdf
Cabeza Pérez, L., Alonso Sáenz de Oger, S., & Gómez Fortes, B. (2023). Ideology and Party Positions on Gender Issues in Spain: Evidence from a Novel Data Set. Politics & Gender, 19(4), 1204-1230. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X23000338
Caravantes, P. (2019). New versus Old Politics in Podemos: Feminization and Masculinized Party Discourse. Men and Masculinities, 22(3), 465-490. https://doi.org/10.1177/1097184X18769350
Caravantes, P., Elizondo, A., & Lombardo, E. (2025). Gendering democracy: feminist parliamentary responses to opposition against gender equality. Journal of Gender Studies, 34(5), 749-763. https://doi.org/10.1080/09589236.2024.2427200
Chen, W., Zhang, X., Wang, T., Yang, B., & Li, Y. (2017). Opinion-aware Knowledge Graph for Political Ideology Detection. IJCAI, 17, 3647-3653. https://www.ijcai.org/proceedings/2017/0510.pdf
Cobo, R. (2019). La cuarta ola feminista y la violencia sexual. https://riuma.uma.es/xmlui/bitstream/handle/10630/17716/134%20Cobo.pdf
Cochrane, K. (2013). All the rebel women: The rise of the fourth wave of feminism (Vol. 8). Guardian Books.
Desperak, I. (2023). The anti-gender movement and its Central and East European main actors. Polish Political Science Review, 11(2), 106-122. https://doi.org/10.2478/ppsr-2023-0013
Dietze, G. (2022). Right-Wing Populism and Gender. En M. Oswald (Ed.), The Palgrave Handbook of Populism (pp. 277-290). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80803-7_16
Ehrlich, S. (2002). Discourse, Gender and Sexual Violence. Discourse & Society, 13(1), 5-7. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926502013001001
Faraldo Cabana, P. (2023). There and back again: Sex crime law reform and counterreform in Spain. [Manuscrito no publicado]
Farris, S. R. (2017). In the name of women’s rights: The rise of femonationalism. Duke University Press.
Fruchterman, T. M. J., & Reingold, E. M. (1991). Graph drawing by force-directed placement. Software: Practice and Experience, 21(11), 1129-1164. https://doi.org/10.1002/spe.4380211102
García Mingo, E., Díaz Fernández, S., & Tomás Forte, S. (2022). (Re) configurando el imaginario sobre la violencia sexual desde el antifeminismo: El trabajo ideológico de la manosfera española. https://e-archivo.uc3m.es/handle/10016/37593
Giesen, M. (2023). Framing gender-based violence in multi-level contexts: a networked approach to studying adoption of the Istanbul Convention. European Journal of Politics and Gender, 6(1), 76-91. https://doi.org/10.1332/251510821X16693059192022
Glavaš, G., Nanni, F., & Ponzetto, S. P. (2017). Unsupervised cross-lingual scaling of political texts. Proceedings of the 15th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Volume 2, Short Papers, 688-693. https://aclanthology.org/E17-2109/
Graff, A., & Korolczuk, E. (2022). Anti-gender politics in the populist moment. Routledge.
Hanneman, R. A., & Riddle, M. (2005). Introduction to social network methods. University of California Riverside.
Horeck, T. (2014). #AskThicke: “Blurred Lines,” Rape Culture, and the Feminist Hashtag Takeover. Feminist Media Studies, 14(6), 1105-1107. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2014.975450
Iverson, S. V. (2006). Performing Gender: A Discourse Analysis of Theatre-Based Sexual Violence Prevention Programs. NASPA Journal, 43(3), 547-577. https://doi.org/10.2202/1949-6605.1683
Iverson, S. V. (2015). A policy discourse analysis of sexual assault policies in higher education. En The crisis of campus sexual violence (pp. 15-32). Routledge.
Juroš, T., Dobrotić, I., & Flego, S. (2020). The rise of the anti-gender movement in Croatia and the 2013 marriage referendum. Europe-Asia Studies
Karlberg, E., Korolczuk, E., & Sältenberg, H. (2025). Insidious de-democratization: conceptualizing anti-gender politics in Sweden. Journal of Gender Studies, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1080/09589236.2024.2446345
Kantola, J., & Lombardo, E. (2017a). Gender and political analysis. Bloomsbury Publishing.
Kantola, J., & Lombardo, E. (2017b). Gender and the economic crisis in Europe: Politics, institutions and intersectionality. Springer.
Kantola, J., & Lombardo, E. (2019). Populism and feminist politics: The cases of Finland and Spain. European Journal of Political Research, 58(4), 1108-1128. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12333
Kantola, J., & Lombardo, E. (2021). Strategies of right populists in opposing gender equality in a polarized European Parliament. International Political Science Review, 42(5), 565-579. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512120963953
Kleinberg, J. M. (1999). Authoritative sources in a hyperlinked environment. Journal of the ACM, 46(5), 604-632. https://doi.org/10.1145/324133.324140
Köttig, M., Bitzan, R., & Petö, A. (2017). Gender and far right politics in Europe. Springer.
Leifeld, P. (2016) “Discourse network analysis: policy debates as dynamic networks”, in J.N. Victor, A.H. Montgomery and M. Lubell (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Political Networks, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp 301-26.
Leifeld, P. (2020) Policy debates and discourse network analysis: a research agenda, Politics and Governance, 8(2): 180-3. https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v8i2.3249
Lombardo, E., Meier, P. and Verloo, M. (2009) “Stretching and bending gender equality: a discursive politics approach”, in E. Lombardo, P. Meier and M. Verloo (eds) The Discursive Politics of Gender Equality: Stretching, Bending, and Policy-Making, London: Routledge, pp 1-18.
Lombardo, E., Caravantes, P., & Díaz Fernández, S. (2025). ‘Stop torpedoing women’s rights!’: Feminist institutional responses to anti-gender politics in Spain and Catalonia parliaments. European Journal of Political Research. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.70005
Mayer, S., & Sauer, B. (2017). ‘Gender ideology’in Austria: Coalitions around an empty signifier.” in Anti-gender campaigns in Europe: Mobilizing against equality, 23-40.
McEwen, H., & Narayanaswamy, L. (2023). The international anti-gender movement: Understanding the rise of anti-gender discourses in the context of development, human rights and social protection (UNRISD Working Paper No. 2023-06). United Nations Research Institute for Social Development.
Mendes, K., Ringrose, J., & Keller, J. (2019). Digital feminist activism: Girls and women fight back against rape culture. Oxford University Press.
Norocel, O. C., & Pettersson, K. (2025). Anti-gender politics in Finland and Romania. European Journal of Politics and Gender, 8(1), 189-206. https://doi.org/10.1332/251510821X16832281009645
Pons, P., & Latapy, M. (2005). “Computing Communities in Large Networks Using Random Walks”. En pInar Yolum, T. Güngör, F. Gürgen, & C. Özturan (Eds.), Computer and Information Sciences—ISCIS 2005 (Vol. 3733, pp. 284-293). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11569596_31
Rebollo-Bueno, S. (2024). Anti-genderism in the Spanish radical right’s propaganda discourses: Vox’s Parental Pin against “gender ideology”. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict. https://doi.org/10.1075/jlac.00125.reb
Rein, M. and Schön, D.A. (1993) “Reframing policy discourse”, in F. Fischer and J. Forester (eds) The Argumentative Turn in Policy Analysis and Planning, London: UCL, pp 145-66.
Rothermel, A. K. (2020). Gender in the United Nations’ agenda on preventing and countering violent extremism. International Feminist Journal of Politics, 22(5), 720-741. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616742.2020.1827967
Saldaña, J. (2021). Coding techniques for quantitative and mixed data. The Routledge reviewer’s guide to mixed methods analysis, 151-160.
Sarfo-Kantankah, K. S. (2021). The discursive construction of men and women in Ghanaian parliamentary discourse: A corpus-based study. Ampersand, 8, 100079. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amper.2021.100079
Schäfer, M. (2012). The Framing of Violence Among Family Members Or (former) Intimate Partners Between’gender-based Universality’and’culture-based Peculiarity’: A Struggle Between Advocacy Coalitions? (Doctoral dissertation, College of Europe).
Shaw, S. (2002). Language and gender in political debates in the House of Commons (Doctoral dissertation, Institute of Education, University of London).
Skjelsbæk, I. (2006). Therapeutic Work With Victims of Sexual Violence in War and Postwar: A Discourse Analysis of Bosnian Experiences. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 12(2), 93-118. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327949pac1202_1
Snow, D. and Benford, R. (1988) Ideology, frame resonance, and participant mobilization, International Social Movement Research, 1: 197-217.
Sola-Morales, S., & Zurbano-Berenguer, B. (2020). Activismo digital y feminismo: Un análisis comparado de cibercampañas contra el acoso callejero en España, Marruecos y Chile. COMUNICACIÓN. Revista Internacional de Comunicación Audiovisual, Publicidad y Estudios Culturales, 1(18), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.12795/Comunicacion.2020.i18.01
Spierings, N., & Zaslove, A. (2015). Conclusion: Dividing the populist radical right between ‘liberal nativism’ and traditional conceptions of gender. In Patterns of Prejudice, 49(1-2), 163-173. https://doi.org/10.1080/0031322X.2015.1024466
Spierings, N., & Zaslove, A. (2017). Gender, populist attitudes, and voting: Explaining the gender gap in voting for populist radical right and populist radical left parties. West European Politics, 40(4), 821-847. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2017.1287448
Thomas, M., Pang, B., & Lee, L. (2012). Get out the vote: Determining support or opposition from Congressional floor-debate transcripts (arXiv:cs/0607062). arXiv. http://arxiv.org/abs/cs/0607062
Verloo, M. (2005). Mainstreaming gender equality in Europe: A critical frame analysis approach. ΕπιθεώρησηΚοινωνικώνΕρευνών, 117, 11-34. https://doi.org/10.12681/grsr.9555
Verloo, M. (Ed.). (2007). Multiple meanings of gender equality: A critical frame analysis of gender policies in Europe. Central European University Press.
Verloo, M. M. T., & Lombardo, E. (2007). Contested gender equality and policy variety in Europe: Introducing a critical frame analysis approach. https://repository.ubn.ru.nl/bitstream/handle/2066/55242/55242.pdf
Verloo, M., & Maloutas, M. P. (2005). Differences in the framing gender inequality as a policy problem across Europe. Eπıotaþetaεacuteømegaρηση Koıotaνømegaνıotaκacuteømegaν Eρευνacuteømegaν, 3-10.
Walby, S. (2005). Gender mainstreaming: Productive tensions in theory and practice. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society, 12(3), 321-343. https://doi.org/10.1093/sp/jxi018
Wilson-McDonald, A. (2023). Gendering Violence in the Age of Anti-Genderism: Feminist Framing of Violence Against Women in Slovakia. Communist and post-communist studies, 56(2), 136-158. https://doi.org/10.1525/cpcs.2023.1828365
Windsor, L., Mitchell, S. M., Osborn, T., Dietrich, B., & Hampton, A. J. (2022). Gender, language, and representation in the United States Senate. Journal of language and politics, 21(6), 919-943. https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.21053.win
Zvada, Ľ. (2022). On Gender and Illiberalism: Lessons From Slovak Parliamentary Debates. Politics and Governance, 10(4), 108-120. https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v10i4.5536
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2026 Carolina Plaza Colodro, Nicolás Miranda Olivares, Rodrigo Rodrigues-Silveira, Miguel Ángel López Varas
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.
