La teoría de las Relaciones Internacionales en los albores del siglo XXI: diálogo, disidencia, aproximaciones
Palabras clave:
teoría relaciones internacionales, realismo político, idealismo político, sistema internacionalResumen
Revista CIDOB d’Afers Internacionals, nº 56
Cuatrimestral (2001)
ISSN:1133-6595 | E-ISSN:2013-035X
El artículo considera las tres principales tendencias en la actual teorización en Relaciones internacionales. La primera es el diálogo que los autores neorrealistas y neoliberales (o institucionalistas) han mantenido por más de una década y que gira en torno a las posibilidades de la cooperación internacional. La segunda es el llamamiento a la disidencia y/o a la reestructuración de la disciplina por parte de los enfoques “reflectivistas”: teoría crítica, postmodernismos y feminismos. La tercera es el intento de alcanzar una síntesis de los enfoques tradicionales y los reflectivistas, intento realizado tanto des de la nueva teoría constructivista como desde la perspectiva clásica de la sociedad internacional.
Citas
ADLER, E. “The Emergence of Cooperation: National Epistemic Communities and the InternationalEvolution of the Idea of Nuclear Arms Control”, International Organization, 46 (1992), p. 101-145.ADLER, E. “Seizing the middle Ground: Constructivism in World Politics”, European Journal ofInternational Relations, 3 (1997), p. 319-363
ADLER, E. “Seizing the middle Ground: Constructivism in World Politics”, European Journal ofInternational Relations, 3 (1997), p. 319-363.
ALKER, H. R. “The Dialectical Logic of Thucydides’ Melian Dialogue”, American Political Science Review,82 (1988), p. 805-820.
ALKER, H. R. “Rescuing ‘Reason’ from the ‘Rationalists’: Reading Vico, Marx and Weber as ReflectiveInstitutionalists”, Millennium, 19 (1990), p. 161-184.
ARENAL, C. del La teoría de las Relaciones Internacionales en España. Madrid: International LawAssociation (sección española), 1978.
ARENAL, C. del Introducción a las Relaciones Internacionales. Madrid: Tecnos (3a. ed.) 1990.ASHLEY, R. “Political Realism and Human Interest”, International Studies Quaterly, 25: 3 (1981), p. 204-326.ASHLEY, R. “The Poverty of Neorealism”, International Organization, 38 (1984), p. 225-261.
ASHLEY, R. “Living on Border Lines: Man, Postructuralism and War”. En DER DERIAN y SHAPIRO(eds.), 1989, p. 259-321.
ASHLEY, R. y WALKER, R. B. J. “Speaking the Language of Exile: Dissident Thought in InternationalStudies”, International Studies Quaterly, 34: 4 (1990).
AXELROD, R. The Evolution of Cooperation. Nueva York: Basic Books, 1984.
AXELROD, R. y KEOHANE, R.“Achieving Cooperation Under Anarchy: Strategies and Institutions”,World Poltics, 38 (1985), p.226-254.
BALDWIN, D. “Neoliberalism, neorealism and World Politics”. En BALDWIN, D. (ed.), Neorealism andNeoliberalism. The Contemporary Debate. Nueva York: Columbia University Press, 1993, p. 3-25.BARBÉ, E. La obra y el pensamiento de Hans J. Morgenthau. Tesis doctoral. Universidad Complutensede Madrid, 1986.
BARBÉ, E.“ El papel del realismo en las relaciones internacionales. La teoría de la política internacio-nal de Hans J. Morgenthau”. Revista de Estudios Políticos, 57 (1987a), p. 149-176.
BARBÉ, E. “El ‘equilibrio del poder’ en la teoría de las Relaciones Internacionales”, Revista CIDOBd’Afers Internacionals, 11 (1987b), p. 5-17.
BARBÉ, E. “Estudio Preliminar”. En MORGENTHAU, H.Escritos sobre política internacional, Madrid:Tecnos, 1990, p. 19-40.
BARBÉ, E. Relaciones Internacionales. Madrid: Tecnos, 1995.BARKIN, J. S. y CRONIN, B. “The State and the Nation: Changing Norms and the Rules of Sovereigntyin International Relations”, International Organization, 48 (1994), p. 107-130.
BARTELSON, J. A Genealogy of Sovereignty. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.
BAYLIS, J. y SMITH, S. (eds.) The Globalization of World Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997.
BERGER, P. y LUCKMAN, T. The Social Construction of Reality. Nueva York: Doubleday Company, 1966.
BIERSTECKER, T. J. y WEBER, C. (eds.), State Sovereignty as Social Construct. Cambridge: CambridgeUniversity Press, 1996.
BROWN, C. “Turtles All the Way Down: Anti-Fundationalism, Critical Theory and International Relations”,Millennium, 33, 2 (1994), p. 213-236.
BROWN, C. “Critical Theory and Postmodernism in International Relations”. En GROOM, A. M. R. yLIGHT, M. Contemporary International Relations: A Guide to Theory, Londres: Pinter, 1994b.
BROWN, C. “International Theory and International Society: The Viability of the Middle Way”, Reviewof International Studies, 21 (1995), p. 183-196.
BULL, H. “The Theory of International Politics, 1919-1969". En PORTER, B. (ed.) The AberysthwythPapers, Londres: Oxford University Press, 1972, p. 30-50.BULL, H. The Anarchical Society. Londres: Macmillan, 1977.
BUNGE, M. Epistemología. Barcelona: Ariel, 1981.
BUZAN, B. “From International System to International Society: Structural Realism and Regime TheoryMeet the English School”, International Organization, 47 (1993), p. 327-352.
BUZAN, B. “The timeless wisdom of realism?” En SMITH, S., BOOTH, K. y ZALEWSKI, M. (eds.), 1996,p. 47-65
BUZAN, B.; JONES, Ch. y LITTLE, R. The Logic of Anarchy. Neorealism to Structural Realism. NuevaYork: Columbia University Press, 1993.
CAMPBELL, D. Writing Security: United States Foreign Policy and the Politics of Identity. Manchester:Manchester University Press, 1992.CAMPBELL, D. National Deconstruction. Violence, Identity and Justice in Bosnia. Minneapolis: Universityof Minessota Press, 1998.
CARR, E. H. The Twenty Years Crisis 1919:1939: An Introduction to the Study of International Relations,Londres: Macmillan [reimpresión con prólogo de 1980 de la segunda edición, 1946. 1a. ed: 1939].
CASTELLS, C. (comp.) Perspectivas feministas en teoría política. Barcelona: Paidós, 1996.
CHECKEL, J. “International Norms and Domestic Politics: Bridging the Rationalist-Constructivist Divide”,European Journal of International Relations, 3, 4 (1997), p. 473-495.
CHECKEL, J. “The Constructivist Turn in International Relations Theory”, World Politics, 50 (1998), p. 342-347.
COX, R. “Social Forces, States and World Orders: Beyond International Relations Theory”, Millennium,12 (1983), p. 162-175.COX, R. Production, Power and World Order: Social Forces in the making of History. Nueva York:Columbia University Press, 1987.
DER DERIAN, J. On Diplomacy: A Genealogy of Western Estrangement. Oxford: Blackwell, 1987.DER DERIAN, J. “Introducing Philosophical Traditions in International Relations”, Millennium, 17 (1988),p. 189-193.
DER DERIAN, J. Antidiplomacy. Spies, Speed, Terror and War. Oxford: Blackwell, 1992.
DER DERIAN, J. “The Value of Security: Hobbes, Marx, Nietzche and Baudrillard”. En DILLON, G. y CAMP-BELL, D. (eds.), The Political Subject of Violence. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1993.
DER DERIAN, J. “A Reinterpretation of Realism: Genalogy, Semiology, Dromology”. En DER DERIAN,J. (ed.), International Theory. Critical Investigations. Londres: Macmillan, 1995, p. 263-396.
DER DERIAN, J. y SHAPIRO, M. (eds.), International / Intertextual Relations. Postmodern Readings ofWorld Politics. Lexington: Lexington Books, 1989.DERRIDA, J. De la Grammatologie. París: Editions du Minuit, 1967,
DERRIDA, J. Parages. París: Galilée, 1986.
DESSLER, D. “Constructivism within a positivist social science”, Review of International Studies, 25(1999), p. 123-137.
DEUTSCH, K. The Analysis of International Relations. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall, 1968.
DUNNE, T. “Realism”. En BAYLIS, J. y SMITH, S. (eds.), 1997a , p. 110-146.
DUNNE, T. Inventing International Society. A History of the English School. Oxford: Macmillan, 1998.
ELSHTAIN, J. B. Women and War. Nueva York: Basic Books, 1987.
ELSHTAIN, J. B. “Freud’s Discourse of War/Politics”, en DER DERIAN y SHAPIRO (eds.), 1989, p. 49-67.
ENLOE, C. Bananas, Beaches & Bases. Making Feminist Sense of International Politics. Los Angeles:University of California Press, 1994.
ENLOE, C. The Morning After: Sexual politics at the end of the Cold War. Los Angeles: University ofCalifornia Press, 1994.
FEARON, J. D. “Bargaining, Enforcement and International Cooperation”, International Organization,52, 2 (1998), p. 269-305.
FERGUSON, Y. y MANSBACH R. “Between Celebration and Despair: Constructive Suggestions forFuture International Theory”, International Studies Quaterly, 35 (1991), p. 363-386.
FINNEMORE, M. National Interests in International Society. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1996.
FLORINI, A. “The Evolution of International Norms”, International Studies Quaterly, 40 (1996), p. 363-389.
FORSYTH, M. “The Classical Theory of International Relations”, Political Studies, 26 (1978), p. 411-416.
GARCÍA PICAZO, P. Las Relaciones Internacionales en el siglo XX. La contienda teórica. Madrid:UNED, 1998.
GARCÍA SEGURA, C. “La contribución de la economía política internacional a la reflexión teórica delas Relaciones Internacionales”, Revista Española de Derecho Internacional. Vol. LI-1999, 2 (2000),pp. 427-468.
GARST, D. “Thucydides and Neorrealism”, International Studies Quaterly, 33 (1989), p. 3-27.
GEORGE, J. “International Relations and the Search for Thinking Space: Another View of the ThirdDebate”, International Studies Quaterly, 33, 3 (1989), p. 269-279.
GEORGE, J. Discourses of Global Politics: A Critical (Re)Introduction to International Relations. Boulder:Lynne Rienner, 1994.
GIDDENS, A. La estructura de clases en las sociedades avanzadas. Madrid: Alianza Editorial, 1979.
GILPIN, R. Power and the Multinational Corporation, Nueva York: Basic Books, 1975.
GILPIN, R. War and Change in World Politics, Nueva York: Cambridge University Press, 1981.
GRADER, S. “The English School of International Relations: Evidence and Evaluation”, Review ofInternational Studies, 14 (1988), p. 29-44.
GRASA, R. “La reestructuración de la teoría de las relaciones internacionales en la posguerra fría: elrealismo y el desafío del liberalismo institucional”, Cursos de Derecho Internacional de Vitoria Gasteiz1996, Madrid: Tecnos / Universidad del País Vasco, 1997, p. 103-147.
GRIECO, J. M. “Anarchy and the Limits of Cooperation: A Realist Critique of the Newest LiberalInstitutionalism”, International Organization, 42 (1988), p. 485-507.
GROOM, A. J. R. y LIGHT, M. (eds.), Contemporary International Relations. A Guide to Theory. Londres:Pinter, 1994.
GUZZINI, S. The Continuing Story of a Death Foretold. Realism in International Relations / InternationalPolitical Economy. Florencia: EUI Working Paper 92/20, 1992.
HAAS, E. B. The Uniting of Europe. Stanford: Stanford University Press. [1a. ed. 1958]HAAS, P. “Epistemic Communities and International Policy Coordination”, International Organization,46 (1992), p. 1-35.
HABERMAS, J. Erkentniss und Interesse. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp Verlag, 1968.
HALLIDAY, F. Rethinking International Relations. Londres: Macmillan, 1994.
HASENCLEVER, A., MAYER, P. y RITTBERGER, V. “Interest, Power, Knowledge: the Study ofInternational Regimes”, Mershon International Studies Review, 40 (1996), p. 177-228.
HASENCLEVER, A., MAYER, P. y RITTBERGER, V. “Integrating theories of international regimes”,Review of International Studies, 26 (2000), p. 3-33.HIGGOTT, R. “International Political Economy”. En GROOM, A. J. R. y LIGHT, M. (eds.), ContemporaryInternational Relations: A Guide to Theory. Londres: Pinter, 1994.
HILL, Ch. “The Origins of Liberal Realism”, Review of International Studies, 15 (1989), p. 319-328.HILL, Ch. y WALLACE, W. “Introduction”. En HILL, Ch. (ed.), The Actors in European Foreign Policy,Londres: Routledge, 1996, p. 1-15.
HOFFMAN, M. “Critical Theory and the Inter-Paradigm Debate”, Millennium, 16 (1987), p. 231-249.HOFFMANN, S. “The European process at Atlantic cross-purposes”, Journal of Common MarketStudies, 3-1 (1964), p. 85-95.
HOFFMANN, S. “Obstinate or obsolete? The fate of the nation-state and the case of western Europe”,Daedalus, 95 (1966), p. 862-915.HOFFMANN, S. Primacy and World Order. Nueva York: McGraw Hill, 1978.
HOFFMANN, S. “Raymond Aron and the Theory of International Relations”, International StudiesQuaterly, 29-1 (1985), p. 13-27.HOLSTI, K. J. “America meets the ‘English School’: State Interests in International Society”, MershonInternational Studies Review, 41 (1987), p. 275-280.
HOLSTI, K. J. “Mirror, Mirror on the wall, Which are the Fairest Theories of All?”, International StudiesQuaterly, 33 (1989), p. 255-261.HOLSTI, K. J. “Scholarship in an era of anxiety”, Review of International Studies, 24 (1998), p. 17-46.
HOLSTI, K. J. “The Problem of Change in International Relations Theory”, comunicación presentadaen la conferencia internacional organizada conjuntamente por ISA-ECIR en Viena, 16-19 de septiem-bre de 1998.
HORKHEIMER, M. “Traditional and Critical Theory”. En Critical Theory, Nueva York: Seabury Press, 1972.JACKSON, R. “The Weight of Ideas in Decolonization: Normative Change in International Relations”.En GOLDSTEIN, J. y KEOHANE, R. (eds.), Ideas and Foreign Policy: Beliefs, Institutions and PoliticalChange. Nueva York: Cornell University Press, 1993.
JONES, R. E. “The English School of International Relations: A Case for Closure”, Review of InternationalStudies, 7 (1981), p. 1-13.
KATZENSTEIN, P. J. (ed.), The Culture of National Security: Norms and Identity in World Politics. NuevaYork: Columbia University Press, 1996.KÉBABDJIAN, G. Les théories de l’économie politique internationale. París: Seuil, 1999.
KEOHANE, R. O. “Theory of World Politics: Structural Realism and Beyond”. En: FINIFTER, A. W. (ed.)Political Science. The State of the Discipline. Washington: American Political Science Association, p.503-540. [Reproducido en Keohoane, R. (ed.) (1986) Neorealism and its Critics, Nueva York: ColumbiaUniversity Press, p. 158-203].
KEOHANE, R. O. After Hegemony. Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton:Princeton University Press, 1984.KEOHANE, R. O. “A Personal Intellectual History”. En KRUZEL, J. y ROSENAU, J. N. (eds.)Understanding World Politics. Lexington: Lexington Books, 1989a, p. 403-415.
KEOHANE, R. O. International Institutions and State Power. Essays in International Relations Theory.Boulder: Westview Press, 1989b.
KEOHANE, R. O. “Institutional Theory and the Realist Challenge after the Cold War”. En BALDWIN,D. (ed.). 1993, p. 269-300.KEOHANE, R. O. “International Institutions: Can Interdependence Work?”, Foreign Policy, 110 (1998),p. 82-96.
KEOHANE, R. O. (ed.) Neorealism and its Critics.Nueva York: Columbia University Press, 1986.KEOHANE, R. O. y HOFFMANN, S. “Institutional Change in Europe in the 1980s”. En KEOHANE, R.O. y Hoffmann, S. (eds.) The New European Community: Decision-making and Institutional Change.Boulder: Westview Press, 1991.
KEOHANE, R. O. y MARTIN, L. “The Promise of International Institutions”, International Security, 20(1995), p. 39-51.
KEOHANE, R. y NYE, J. (eds.) Trasnational Relations and World Politics. Cambridge: Harvard University Press [publicado anteriormente como número extraordinario de la revista International Organization,25, 1971].
KEOHANE, R. y NYE, J. Power and Interdependence. World Politics in Transition, Boston: Little Brown,1977.KEOHANE, R. O. NYE, J. y Hoffmann, S. (eds.) After the Cold War. International Institutions and StateStrategies in Europe, 1989-1991. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1993.
KLEIN, B. “How the West Was Won: Representational politics of NATO”, International Studies Quaterly,34 (1990), p. 311-326.
KLOTZ, A. Norms in international Relations: The Struggle against Apartheid. Ithaca: Cornell UniversityPress, 1995.
KNORR, K. y ROSENAU, J. (eds.) Contending Approaches to International Politics. Princeton: PrincetonUniversity Press, 1969.
KRASNER, S.I nternational Regimes. Ithaca: Cornell University Press [publicado en 1982 como núme-ro extraordinario de la revista International Organizationvol. 36].
KRASNER, S. “The acomplishments of International Political Economy”. En SMITH, S., BOOTH, K. yZALEWSKI, M. (eds.), 1996, p. 108-127.
KRATOCHWIL, F. Rules, norms and decisions. On the conditions of practical and legal reasoning ininternational relations and domestic affairs. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989.
KUHN, T. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Chicago: University of Chicago PRESS, 1962.KUHN, T. “Reflections on my critics”. En LAKATOS, I. y MUSGRAVE, A. (eds.), Criticism and the Growthof Knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1970, p. 259-277.
LANDAU, A. y WHITMAN, R. G. (eds.), Rethinking the European Union. Institutions, Interests andIdentities. Londres, Macmillan, 1997.LAPID, Y. “The Third Debate: On the prospects of International Theory in a Post-positivist Era”,International Studies Quaterly, 33 (1989), p. 235-254.
LINDBERG, L. The Political Dynamics of European Economic Integration. Stanford: Stanford UniversityPress, 1970.LINKLATER, A. Men and Citizens in the Theory of International Relations. Londres: Macmillan, 1982(2ª ed., 1990).
LINKLATER, A. “Realism, Marxism and Critical International Theory”, Review of International Studies,12 (1986), p. 301-312.
LINKLATER, A. “The Question of the Next Stage in International Relations Theory: A Critical-TheoreticalPoint of View”, Millennium, 21, 1992, p. 77-98.
LONG, D. y WILSON, P. (eds.) Thinkers of the twenty years’ crisis: inter-war idealism reassessed.Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1995.
MAGHROORI, R. y RAMBERG, B. (eds.) Globalism versus Realism: International Relations Third Debate.Colorado: Westview Press, 1982.
MANSBACH, R. “Neo-This and Neo-That: Or ‘Play It Sam’ (Again and Again)”, Mershon InternationalStudies Review, 40 (1996), p. 90-95.
MANSBACH, R., FERGUSON, Y. y LAMPERT, D. The Web of World Politics, Englewood Cliffs: PrenticeHall, 1977.
MANSBACH R. y VASQUEZ, J. In Search of Theory: A New Paradigm for Global Politics. Nueva York:Columbia University Press, 1981.MEDINA, M. Teoría y formación de la sociedad internacional. Madrid: Tecnos, 1983.
MESA, R. Teoría y práctica de Relaciones Internacionales. Madrid: Taurus, 1977.MORAVCSIK, A. “Negotiating the Single European Act: National Interests and Conventional Statecraftin the European Community”, International Organization, 45 (1991), p. 651-688.
MORAVCSIK, A. “Preferences and Power in the European Community: A Liberal IntergovernamentalistApproach”, Journal of Common Market Studies, 31 (1993), p. 473-524.
MORGENTHAU, H. Politics among Nations. The Struggle for Power and Peace. Nueva York: AlfredKnopf, 1978 [1ª. ed. 1948].
MOURITZEN, H. “Kenneth Waltz: a critical rationalist between international politics and foreign policy”.En NEUMANN, I. y WAEVER, O. (eds.), 1997, p. 66-89.
MESA, R. (1977) Teoría y práctica de Relaciones Internacionales. Madrid: Taurus.
MORGENTHAU, H. Politics among Nations. The Struggle for Power and Peace. Nueva York: AlfredA. Knopf 1978a [. edición 1948].
NEUFELD, M. The Restructuring of International Relations Theory, Cambridge: Cambridge UniversityPress, 1995.
NIOU, E. y ORDESHOOK, P. “Less Filling, Tastes Great’. The Realist-Neoliberal Debate”, World Politics,46 (1994), p. 209-234.
NYE, J. Peace in parts. Boston: Little Brown & Co., 1971.OLSON, W. y LEE, J. L. (eds.) The Theory and Practice of International Relations. Nueva York: Prentice-Hall (9ª. ed.), 1994.
ONUF, N. G. World of Our Making: Rules and Rule in Social Theory and International Relations. Columbia:University of South Carolina Press, 1989.
OSIANDER, A. “Rereading Early Twentieth-Century IR Theory: Idealism Revisited”, International StudiesQuaterly, 42-4 (1998), p. 409-432.
PALOMARES LERMA, G. “Hegemonía y cambio en la teoría de las relaciones internacionales”, RevistaCIDOB d’Afers Internacionals, 22 (1991), p. 19-51.RAWLS, J. “Two Concepts of Rules”, Philosophical Review, 64, 1955, p. 3-33.
RISSE-KAPPEN, TH. “Ideas Do Not Float Freely: Transnational Coalitions, Democratic Structures, andthe End of the Cold War”, International Organization, 48 (1994), p. 185-214.
ROSENAU, J. (ed.) Linkage Politics. Essays on the Confergence of National and International Systems.Nueva York: Free Press, 1969.
ROSENBERG, J. “What’s the Matter with Realism?”. Review of International Studies, 16-4 (1990), p.285-303.
ROSENBERG, J. “The International imaginations: International Relations Theory and classic socialanalysis”, Millennium, 33 (1994), p. 85-108.
RUGGIE, J. “International Responses to Technology: Concepts and Trends”, International Organization,29 (1975), p. 557-583.
RUGGIE, J. “What Makes the World Hang Together? Neo-utilitarism and the Social ConstructivistChalenge”, International Organization, 52 (1998), p. 855-885.
RUGGIE, J. y KRATOCHWIL, F. “International Organization: a State of the Art on an Art of the State”,International Organization, 40 (1986), p. 753-775.
SALOMÓN, M. “La PESC y las teorías de la integración europea: las aportaciones de los ‘nuevos inter-gubernamentalismos’”, Revista CIDOB d’Afers Internacionals, 45-46 (1999), p. 197-221.
SCOTT, A. M. The Revolution in Statecraft: Informal Penetration. Nueva York: Macmillan, 1967.SCHMIDT, B. “The historiography of academic international relations”, Review of International Studies,20-4 (1994), p. 340-367
SCHMIDT, B. “Lessons from the Past: Reassessing the Interwar Disciplinary History of InternationalRelations”, International Studies Quaterly, 42-4 (1998), p. 433-459.
SEARLE, J. “Rationality and Realism, What is at Stake?”, Daedalus, 122, 4 (1993), p. 55-83.SEARLE, J. The construction of social reality, Nueva York: The Free Press, 1995.
SHAPIRO, M. “Representing World Politics: The Sport/War Intertext”. En DER DERIAN, J. y SHAPI-RO, M. (eds.), 1989, p. 69-96.
SJOLANDER, C. T. y COX, W. (eds.), Beyond Positivism: Critical Reflections on International Relations,Boulder: Lynne Rienner, 1994.
SMITH, S. “The Forty Years Detour”, Millennium, 21 (1992), p. 489-506.
SMITH, S. “New Approaches to International Theory”. En BAYLIS, J. Y SMITH, S. (eds.), 1997, p.165-190.
SNYDER, G. H. y DIESING, P. Conflict among Nations: Bargaining, Decision Making and System Structure in International Crises. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1977.
SOKAL, A. y BRICMONT, J. Intelectual Impostures. Londres: Profile Books, 1998.SORENSEN, G. “IR Theory after the Cold War”, Review of International Studies, 24 (1998), p. 83-100.
STEANS, J. Gender and International Relations. An Introduction. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1998.
SUGANAMI, H. “The Structure of Institutionalism: An Anatomy of British Mainstream InternationalRelations”, International Relations, 7 (1983), p. 2363-2381.
SUHR, M. “Robert O. Keohane: a contemporary classic”. En NEUMANN, I. Y WAEVER, O. (eds.) Thefuture of International Relations. Masters in the Making ?Londres: Routledge, 1997, p. 90-120.
SYLVESTER, CH. Feminist Theory and International Relations in a Postmodern Era. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press, 1994.
TAYLOR, P. “The European Community and the State: assumptions, theories and propositions”, Reviewof International Studies, 17 (1991), p. 109-125.TAYLOR, P. The European Union in the 1990's. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996.
TICKNER, J. A. “Hans Morgenthau’s Principles of Political Realism: A Feminist Reformulation”, Millennium,17 (1988), p. 429-440.TONG, R. Feminist Thought: A Comprehensive Introduction. Londres: Unwin, 1989.
TRUYOL, A. La sociedad internacional. Madrid: Alianza, 1993 [1ª. ed. 1974].
VIOTTI, M. y KAUPPI, M. International Relations Theory. Realism, Pluralism, Globalism. Londres: Macmillan, 1987.
WAEVER, O. “International Society – Theoretical Promises Unfulfilled?” Cooperation and Conflict, 27(1992), p. 97-129.
WAEVER, O. “The rise and fall of the interparadigm debate”. En SMITH, S., BOOTH, K. Y ZALEWS-KI, M. (eds.), 1996, p. 149-185.
WALKER, R. B. J. “The Prince and the Pauper: Tradition, Modernity and Practice in the Theory ofInternational Relations”. En DER DERIAN, J. y SHAPIRO, M. (eds.), 1989, pp. 25-48.
WALT, M. “International Relations: One World, Many Theories”, Foreign Policy, 110 (1998), p. 29-46.WALTZ, K. “Theory of International Relations”. En GREENSTEIN, F. Y POLSBI, N. (eds.), InternationalPolitics, Handbook of Political Science. Reading: Addison-Wesley, 1975, p.1-85.
WALTZ, K. Theory of International Politics. Nueva York: Random House, 1979.WALTZ, K. “The Myth of National Interdependence”. En MAGHROORI Y RAMBERG (eds.), 1982, p. 81-96.
WALTZ, K. “Reflections on Theory of International Politics: A Response to My Critics”. En KEOHANE,R. (ed.), 1986, p. 322-345.
ZACHER, M. W. y MATTHEW R. A. “Liberal International Theory: Common Threads, Divergent Strands”.En KEGLEY, Ch. (ed.), Controversies in International Relations Theory. Nueva York: St. Martin’s Press,1995, p. 108-126.
WENDT, A. “The Agent-Structure Problem in International Relations Theory”, International Organization,41 (1987), p. 335-370.
WENDT, A. “Anarchy is what states make of it: the social construction of power politics”, InternationalOrganization, 46 (1992), p. 391-425.
WENDT, A. “Constructing International Politics”, International Security, 30, 1 (1995), p. 71-81.
WENDT, A. Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.
WIGHT, M. International Theory. The three traditions. Londres: Leicester University Press, 1991.
