Determinants in the choice of non-compulsory science subjects

Determinantes en la elección de materias optativas de ciencias

https://doi.org/10.4438/1988-592X-RE-2025-409-698

Radu Bogdan Toma

Universidad de Burgos

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4846-7323

Iraya Yánez Pérez

Universidad de Burgos

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5260-2228

Abstract

Introduction: The curricular structure provides the option to forego scientific subjects in the final year of compulsory secondary education. This decision can prematurely disrupt formal engagement with these disciplines, typically around the ages of 14-15. Therefore, it is crucial to identify attitudinal factors that influence the selection of elective science subjects at an early age. This research focuses on two key constructs: the perception of difficulty and the associated costs of studying sciences and mathematics. Methodology: The sample comprised 214 students from 4th to 6th grade of primary education. A non-probability convenience sampling method was used to select the participants. A Likert-type instrument was administered, and its validity and reliability were assessed, proving adequate for the current sample. Data were analyzed using inferential statistics and a hierarchical logistic regression model. Results: A high percentage of students, ranging from 60.2% to 79.7%, exhibited a low interest in choosing elective science subjects during secondary education. The primary reason for this lack of interest is the perceived difficulty associated with these disciplines. Unexpectedly, the perceived cost of studying sciences increases students´ intentions, which can be explained by various theories, such as expectancy-value theory, growth mindset theory, or self-determination theory. In contrast, neither the perceived cost nor difficulty of mathematics influences students´ intentions to pursue this field. Conclusions: These findings are discouraging and highlight the urgency of designing and implementing educational programs targeted at the primary education stage to address and reverse this trend.

Keywords:

student attitude, learning difficulties, natural sciences, mathematics, elementary school, choice of studies, science education

Resumen

Introducción: La estructura curricular ofrece la opción de no cursar materias científicas en el último curso de la Educación Secundaria Obligatoria. Esta decisión puede interrumpir prematuramente, alrededor de los 14-15 años, el contacto formal con estas disciplinas. Por tanto, resulta fundamental identificar a temprana edad los factores actitudinales que influyen en la elección de asignaturas optativas de ciencias. La presente investigación se enfoca en dos constructos clave: la percepción de dificultad y el coste asociado a las ciencias y a las matemáticas. Metodología: La muestra estuvo conformada por 214 estudiantes de 4º a 6º curso de Educación Primaria. Se utilizó un muestreo no probabilístico por conveniencia para seleccionar a los participantes. Se aplicó un instrumento de tipo Likert, cuya validez y confiabilidad fueron evaluadas y resultaron adecuadas para la muestra actual. Los datos fueron analizados mediante estadística inferencial y un modelo de regresión logística jerárquica. Resultados: Un alto porcentaje de los estudiantes encuestados, que oscila entre el 60.2% y el 79.7% en función del curso escolar, muestra un bajo interés por elegir asignaturas de ciencias optativas durante la secundaria. La principal razón para esta baja intención es la percepción de dificultad asociada a estas disciplinas. De manera inesperada, el coste percibido de estudiar ciencias actúa como un factor que incrementa las intenciones de los estudiantes, lo cual puede explicarse a través de diversas teorías, como la teoría de la expectativa-valor, la mentalidad de crecimiento o la teoría de la autodeterminación. En contraste, ni el coste ni la dificultad percibidos de las matemáticas influyen en las intenciones de los estudiantes de cursar esta área. Conclusiones: Estos hallazgos resultan desalentadores y ponen de manifiesto la urgencia de diseñar e implementar programas educativos focalizados en la etapa de Educación Primaria para abordar y revertir esta situación.

Palabras clave:

actitud del alumno, dificultad de aprendizaje, ciencias de la naturaleza, matemáticas, escuela primaria, elección de estudios, educación científica

Introduction

Student interest and participation in science decline as they progress through their studies (Toma & Lederman, 2022; Tytler & Ferguson, 2023). This global and persistent trend often leads to students abandoning science after completing their compulsory secondary education. In Spain, the situation is worsened by the curriculum structure. The option to avoid science subjects in the final year of secondary education results in an early end to formal engagement with these disciplines, typically around the ages of 14-15 (Toma, 2022a). This is concerning, given the importance of scientific literacy for active citizenship (Bybee & McCrae, 2011). Attitudes toward science significantly impact academic performance, career choices, future studies, and public support for scientific research funding (Besley, 2018; Bidegain & Lukas Mujika, 2020; Newell et al., 2015). Consequently, they have become a central focus of educational research. These attitudes reflect students’ subjective evaluations of science and its study, encompassing both affective aspects (emotions and feelings) and cognitive elements (thoughts and beliefs) that shape their behavior and decisions to pursue science-related studies (Tytler & Ferguson, 2023). Despite a growing body of research, most studies focus on secondary education. However, by this stage, students´ attitudes toward science are often already deteriorating, making it difficult to reverse the trend (Carrasquilla et al., 2022; Dapía et al., 2019; Robles et al., 2015). Disinterest in science is evident from primary education onward, with notable gender differences favoring boys (Dapía et al., 2019; Toma, 2022a). Therefore, identifying the attitudinal factors that influence the scientific aspirations of primary school students is crucial (Miller, 2021). This study addresses this objective, focusing particularly on two key factors: perceived cost and difficulty. The research aims to answer the following questions:

Theoretical underpinnings and operationalization of hypotheses

Cost represents the subjective assessment of the sacrifices associated with an activity (Eccles & Wigfield, 2023; Muenks et al., 2023). In the context of this study, the cost of studying science may involve, among other things, considerable mental effort or the forfeiting of other valued activities. This construct, initially proposed by the Expectancy-Value Theory, has been revitalized in recent research (Barron & Hulleman, 2015; Flake et al., 2015). These studies have refined and expanded its conceptualization and evaluation, demonstrating its relevance in the educational field. Research indicates that high levels of perceived cost are associated with a lower valuation of the activity being studied, as well as reduced persistence and intentions to continue with it (Eccles & Wigfield, 2023; Jiang & Rosenzweig, 2021). In the case of science, this phenomenon could help explain the lack of interest and eventual abandonment of scientific studies once they are no longer mandatory, as outlined in Hypothesis #1.

On the other hand, perceived difficulty reflects the subjective assessment of the complexity of an activity, such as studying science (Pattal et al., 2018; Toma, 2022b). According to the Self-Determination Theory (Ryan & Deci, 2000), an optimal challenge promotes a sense of competence. Activities that are either too easy or too difficult can lead to boredom, discouragement, and abandonment. A high perceived difficulty reduces student interest, negatively influencing career choices and academic achievements (Ong et al., 2022; Pattal et al., 2018). In this sense, many students, despite their initial interest, abandon scientific careers due to the high perceived difficulty of studying those (Chi et al., 2017). Therefore, perceiving the learning of science in primary education as excessively difficult may lead to frustration and disengagement in later stages, as proposed in Hypothesis #2.

Finally, it is crucial to also consider the perceived cost and difficulty of mathematics when analyzing students´ intentions to study science. Although mathematics is mandatory in secondary education, previous research suggests that its perceived cost and difficulty influence the choice to pursue scientific studies, particularly among women (Ellis et al., 2016; Wang & Degol, 2013). Therefore, it is likely that a high perceived cost, as outlined in Hypothesis #3, and a high perceived difficulty, as proposed in Hypothesis #4, of studying mathematics will also negatively impact students´ intentions to choose elective scientific subjects in secondary education.

Method

This is a quantitative research study. The design is cross-sectional, predictive, and observational, as it aims to predict the attitudinal factors that influence the intention to choose elective scientific subjects in secondary education.

Participants

A non-probabilistic convenience sampling method was used, selecting two schools from the city of Burgos—one public and one private. The final sample consisted of 214 Spanish primary school students enrolled in 4th (22%), 5th (36.9%), and 6th grade (41.1%). Nearly half of the participants were girls (48.6%), and the average age was 10.34 years (SD = .91). The minimum sample size was calculated based on Ogundimu et al.´s (2016) criteria, which recommend a minimum of 10-20 events or responses per independent or predictor variable. Given a logistic regression model with six variables (as described in the following sections), a minimum of 60-120 events was estimated. The final sample size (214 subjects) provided an event rate per variable of 35.7, which far exceeded the recommended minimum.

Instruments

Data were collected using five scales based on existing instruments with evidence of validity and reliability, utilizing a 5-point Likert scale (1 = Strongly Disagree, 5 = Strongly Agree). One of these scales measures the intention to choose elective science subjects, while the other two assess perceived difficulty—one applied to science and the other to mathematics. The two difficulty scales were replicated: first applied to science, then to mathematics, resulting in a total of five distinct scales. Anonymized data are available at the following link:

https://osf.io/buzhv/?view_only=d8ecaef1997c448d951cd1abe1162fc2.

Dependent variable

A single-item scale developed by Toma et al. (2019) was used to measure students´ intention to choose elective science subjects in secondary education. The specific question was: "It is very likely that I will enroll in elective science subjects in Secondary Education." Previous research has demonstrated that this is a valid and reliable measure for assessing this intention, showing high consistency in responses over time. It is important to note that in the Spanish education system, formal science education begins in Primary Education. In Secondary Education, a turning point occurs: Biology and Geology are mandatory in the first and third years, Physics and Chemistry in the second and third years, and in the fourth year, both subjects become elective. Therefore, the item explicitly refers to the Secondary Education stage.

Independent variables

To measure the perceived cost of science and mathematics, a six-item scale for each subject was used. To measure the difficulty perceived by students in these subjects, a six-item scale for each subject was also employed (Pattal et al., 2018; Toma, 2022b). The validity and reliability of the instruments were tested for this specific sample. Both scales underwent exploratory factor analysis according to the recommendations of Ferrando et al. (2022). Specifically, (i) a polychoric correlation matrix was used, and factors were extracted using the maximum likelihood method with Oblimin oblique rotation; (ii) the parallel analysis criterion was employed to determine the optimal number of factors; and (iii) only those items with factor loadings above 0.40 and no cross-loadings between factors were retained.

Optimal sample adequacy indices were obtained: the KMO was 0.851 for the science items and 0.867 for the mathematics items, and Bartlett´s test of sphericity was significant in both cases (p < 0.001). The parallel analysis confirmed the presence of the two proposed latent factors (Figure I). For the science-related questionnaire, the items grouped as expected, forming two factors that explained 50.4% of the variability in the science-related responses (Table I). However, for the mathematics-related questionnaire, items 4, 5, and 6 of cost loaded onto the perceived difficulty dimension, and item 5 of perceived difficulty loaded below the minimum threshold. After their removal, the two expected factors were obtained, explaining 49.6% of the variability in the mathematics responses. The factor analysis results revealed factor loadings above 0.40 for all items, indicating high factor saturation and a clear factor structure. No significant cross-loadings between factors were observed, confirming the unidimensionality of each construct.

FIGURE I. Results of the parallel analysis

a) Science-related items


b) Math-related items


Source: Compiled by the authors

TABLE I. Results of the exploratory factor analysis

Ítems and constructs Science Mathematics
I II I II
I. Cost
1. I must sacrifice a lot of my free time to be good at science/mathematics 0.724 -0.179 0.747 -0.154
2. I must give up many things to get good grades in science/mathematics 0.756 -0.026 0.562 0.156
3. I need to spend a lot of time studying to get good grades in science/mathematics 0.722 -0.112 0.832 0.079
4. I can not spend the needed studying time to get good grades in science/mathematics 0.630 0.041 - -
5. Science/mathematics requires too much effort from me 0.728 0.230 - -
6. Doing science/mathematics homework takes too much of my time 0.712 0.176 - -
II. Perceived difficulty
1. I am not good at science/mathematics -0.079 0.737 -0.036 0.667
2. I struggle with science/mathematics 0.150 0.645 0.019 0.684
3. I get bad grades in science/mathematics -0.039 0.703 -0.039 0.709
4. Science/mathematics seems difficult to me 0.318 0.469 0.195 0.624
5. I find it hard to understand science/mathematics lessons 0.048 0.560 - -
6. I cannot do the science/mathematics homework well 0.056 0.633 0.195 0.667

Source: Compiled by the authors

The reliability of the scales was evaluated using McDonald´s Omega coefficient, as it is more appropriate than Cronbach´s Alpha for ordinal-type items (Hayes & Coutts, 2020). The results indicated adequate reliability for both the cost scales (science = 0.83, mathematics = 0.74) and the perceived difficulty scales (science = 0.78, mathematics = 0.74). In summary, the instruments used were valid and reliable for the present sample, allowing for the collection of accurate information regarding students´ perceptions of these subjects.

Control variables

The gender and age of the students were used as control variables.

Data analysis

A descriptive analysis was used to examine the perceived difficulty and cost associated with science and mathematics. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was statistically significant for all independent variables, indicating that the normality assumption required for parametric inferential tests was not met. Therefore, non-parametric tests such as the Mann-Whitney U test and the Kruskal-Wallis H test were used for comparisons based on gender and school year, respectively. The effect size was assessed using Cohen’s r, with values of 0.1 indicating a small effect, 0.3 a moderate effect, and 0.5 a large effect. Additionally, a frequency analysis was conducted to identify the intentions to choose elective science subjects in secondary education. The dependent variable, being a single-item scale, was dichotomized using the median split procedure (Iacobucci et al., 2015). Values below the median indicated low intentions and values of and above the median indicated high intentions. Comparisons based on gender and school year were made using the chi-square test, and the effect size was measured using Cramér’s V, with values of 0.1 indicating a small effect, 0.3 a moderate effect, and 0.5 a large effect. Finally, a hierarchical logistic regression model was used to predict the intention to enroll in non-mandatory science courses. The correlation between the independent variables ranged from 0.202 to 0.697, meeting the multicollinearity criterion. IBM SPSS Statistics version 26 (NY: IBM Corp.) was used for the data analysis.

Results

Descriptive analysis

Table II presents the perceived cost and difficulty of science and mathematics according to sociodemographic variables. Overall, students perceive both science and mathematics as relatively low in cost and difficulty. The cost associated with mathematics is higher than that of science, and in terms of difficulty, science is seen as slightly easier than mathematics. When breaking down the results by gender, boys perceive a higher cost in studying science (U = 4567, p = 0.01) compared to girls, but no such difference is found in mathematics (p > 0.05). It is worth noting that the effect size was small (r = 0.17). Additionally, both genders perceive similar levels of difficulty in both subjects (p > 0.05). Finally, when considering the school year, the cost of science and mathematics decreases as students progress through the grades, but this change is not significant (p > 0.05). On the other hand, the perception of difficulty for both subjects remains relatively constant (p > 0.05).

TABLE II. Cost and perceived difficulty of science and mathematics

Sociodemographic variables Cost of science Cost of mathematics Difficulty of science Difficulty of mathematics
All participants 2.27 (0.84) 2.59 (0.96) 2.06 (0.68) 2.15 (0.73)
Boys 2.40 (0.82) 2.68 (0.97) 2.04 (0.64) 2.15 (0.76)
Girls 2.13 (0.85) 2.50 (0.96) 2.08 (0.72) 2.14 (0.69)
4th grade 2.44 (0.74) 2.79 (0.93) 2.10 (0.70) 2.19 (0.80)
5th grade 2.19 (0.87) 2.53 (0.99) 2.03 (0.66) 2.17 (0.70)
7th grade 2.25 (0.86) 2.54 (0.96) 2.07 (0.69) 2.10 (0.71)

Mean (standard deviation)

Source: Compiled by the authors

Table III presents the intentions to choose elective science subjects in secondary education according to sociodemographic variables. The majority of students show low intentions to choose elective science subjects in secondary education. When analyzing the results by gender, both boys and girls display similar patterns in terms of low intentions (p > 0.05). However, the distribution of intentions varies considerably according to the school year (p = 0.023), albeit with a small effect size (Cramér’s V = 0.19). A significant decrease in intentions is observed in 5th grade, followed by a recovery in 6th grade.

TABLE III. Intentions to choose science electives in secondary school.

Sociodemographic variables Low intentions High intentions
All participants 68.7% 31.3%
Boys 68.2% 31.8%
Girls 69.2% 30.8%
4th grade 66% 34%
5th grade 79.7% 20.3%
7th grade 60.2% 39.8%

Source: Compiled by the authors

Hierarchical logistic regression analysis

Table IV presents the results of the hierarchical logistic regression model. The initial model, which included only the control variables (gender and age), did not show a significant fit to the data (χ² (2, N = 214) = 1.362, p = 0.506). As a result, gender and age do not influence students´ decisions to enroll in elective science subjects in secondary school. The expanded hierarchical logistic regression model, which included the independent variables, showed a significant fit to the data (χ² (6, N = 214) = 14.233, p = 0.007), explaining between 7% and 9.9% of the variance in students´ intentions to enroll in elective sciences. Of the independent variables analyzed, only the perceived cost and difficulty of science emerged as significant predictors. Specifically, the results indicate a negative relationship between the perceived difficulty of science and the intention to enroll. The odds ratio (Exp(B) = 0.363) reveals that a one-unit increase in perceived difficulty decreases the likelihood of choosing elective science subjects by 63.7%. Contrary to expectations, a positive relationship was found between the perceived cost of studying science and the intention to enroll. The odds ratio (Exp(B) = 1.695) suggests that a one-unit increase in the perceived cost increases the likelihood of selecting these subjects by 69.5%. Consequently, hypothesis #2 is accepted, while hypotheses #1, #3, and #4 are rejected.

TABLE IV. Hierarchical logistic regression análisis

Predictors Step 1 Step 2
B Exp(B) B Exp(B)
Gender 0.047 1.048 -0.094 0.910
Age 0.187 1.206 0.248 1.282
Cost of science - - 0.528* 1.695
Coste of mathematics - - -0.222 0.801
Difficulty of science - - -1.013** 0.363
Difficulty of mathematics - - -0.008 0.992

*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01

Source: Compiled by the authors

Discussion

This study examined the relationship between perceived cost, difficulties in science and mathematics, and the intention to take elective science subjects in secondary school among primary school students. This research contributes to the existing literature by analyzing a crucial stage in the development of scientific attitudes (Dapía et al., 2019; Miller, 2021).

The results indicate that students perceive mathematics as slightly more demanding than science, both in terms of cost and difficulty. Boys report higher costs in both science and mathematics, although the perception of difficulty is similar across genders. As they progress through primary school, the perceived cost in both areas decreases, but the perception of difficulty remains low and consistent. However, a high percentage of students, especially in 5th grade, show little intention to take elective science subjects in secondary school. This trend reveals an early decline in scientific attitudes and aspirations, which aligns with both international and national research (Toma, 2020; Tytler & Ferguson, 2023). Nevertheless, the results differ by gender. Previous studies suggest more positive attitudes toward science among boys than girls (Carrasquilla et al., 2022; Dapía et al., 2019). However, this study presents a contrary finding: boys reported higher levels of perceived cost in both areas. This discrepancy could be attributed to the different conceptualizations and instruments used to measure attitudes toward science. The term "attitude" serves as an umbrella for a wide range of constructs, such as self-efficacy, enjoyment, perceived relevance, and interest (Toma & Lederman, 2022). However, the cost aspect has been less explored (Flake et al., 2015), which may explain the differences found in contrast to previous studies.

On the other hand, the regression analysis indicates that the perception of cost and difficulty in science influences the intention to take elective science subjects in secondary school. However, these same factors in mathematics do not show a significant impact. This difference could be attributed to the characteristics of both subjects in primary school. Science is typically approached with a more conceptual focus, while mathematics centers on basic numerical and geometric skills. Additionally, the lesser presence of advanced mathematics in primary school science could reduce the association between the two areas as perceived by students. Future studies in secondary school, where the connection between science and mathematics is more evident, could further explore this relationship.

An unexpected finding was the positive effect of the perceived cost of science on students´ intentions. Specifically, the perceived cost significantly increased the intention to enroll in elective science subjects. Several explanations could support these results. According to the Expectancy-Value Model (Eccles & Wigfield, 2023), academic decisions are influenced by expectations of success and the value attributed to an activity. If a student perceives a high value in studying science (such as success or satisfaction), their intention to enroll will increase, even in the face of high costs. Additionally, students with a growth mindset may interpret the perceived cost of science as an opportunity to develop their skills (Dweck, 2006). This mindset, characterized by the belief in the malleability of abilities, is associated with greater persistence and a lower likelihood of avoiding tasks that require effort (Mrazek et al., 2018). As a result, these students may be more willing to choose science subjects despite the perceived costs.

Finally, these results could also be explained in light of Self-Determination Theory (Ryan & Deci, 2000). This theory distinguishes between intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. If a student is intrinsically motivated by science, the perceived cost may be viewed as an overcomeable obstacle, even a satisfying one, as it is part of an activity they find rewarding. Additionally, overcoming challenges can enhance the sense of competence, a central element in this theory. A greater sense of competence, in turn, strengthens intrinsic motivation and increases intentions. In this regard, students who perceive their studies as an investment in their professional future and who strive to meet their academic obligations are more likely to complete their studies (Abiétar López et al., 2023). However, the proposed explanations are hypothetical and require further research for confirmation.

These findings have important educational implications. At the educational level, it is crucial to intervene early, in primary education, to foster positive attitudes toward science. Given the low intention of many students to take elective science subjects in secondary school, primarily due to their perception of difficulty, pedagogical strategies should be implemented to reduce this perception, enabling meaningful learning. In this regard, it is essential to design teaching materials and activities that align with students´ capabilities. Although there are resources—both analog and digital—backed by research in science education (Yánez-Pérez et al., 2024a), their use in classrooms in Spain is limited. Therefore, the results also highlight the need for more effective educational policies (Yánez-Pérez et al., 2024b). It is suggested that initial and ongoing teacher training be improved to provide educators with the necessary pedagogical tools to foster positive attitudes toward science from an early age. The growth mindset theory (Dweck, 2006) can guide these efforts by teaching that scientific understanding and ability are not innate, but rather developed through practice and effort. Additionally, cognitive load theory is essential for planning effective learning, and avoiding the overload of working memory with overly complex or trivial tasks (Sweller, 2020).

The results of this study should be interpreted in light of the following limitations. Convenience sampling limits the generalizability of the findings to other populations and educational contexts. Additionally, while the instruments used have demonstrated validity and reliability, measuring cost as a unidimensional construct could be a limitation. Recent research with secondary and tertiary students indicates that cost is a multidimensional construct. In fact, the interaction between cost and the intention to enroll in science suggests the need for more comprehensive instruments that reflect the complex conceptualization of this construct.

Conclusions

The study reveals that a high proportion of primary school students show low intention to enroll in elective science subjects in secondary school, primarily due to the perception of difficulty in the subject. It is also observed that boys perceive a higher cost in both science and mathematics, suggesting the need for specific educational measures to address these differences. Finally, a higher perceived cost in science appears to increase the intention to take elective courses, which could indicate that perceived challenges may be viewed as motivating opportunities; an aspect that opens avenues for future research. Overall, these findings highlight the urgency of intervening to improve interest in science starting from the primary education stage.

Referencias bibliográficas

Abiétar López, M., Bernad i Garcia, J. C., Córdoba Iñesta, A. I., Giménez Urraco, E., Meri Crespo, E., y Navas Saurin, A. A. (2023). Factores diferenciales en los itinerarios en Formación Profesional: un estudio longitudinal. Revista de Educación, 401, 155–178. https://doi.org/10.4438/1988-592X-RE-2023-401-587

Barron, K. E., y Hulleman, C. S. (2015). Expectancy-Value-Cost Model of Motivation. International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences: Second Edition, 503–509. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.26099-6

Besley, J. C. (2018). The National Science Foundation’s science and technology survey and support for science funding, 2006–2014. Public Understanding of Science, 27(1), 94–109. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662516649803

Bidegain, G., y Lukas Mujika, J. F. (2020). Exploring the relationship between attitudes toward science and PISA scientific performance. Revista de Psicodidáctica, 25(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psicoe.2019.08.002

Bybee, R. W., y McCrae, B. (2011). Scientific literacy and student attitudes: Perspectives from PISA 2006 science. International Journal of Science Education, 33(1), 7–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2010.518644

Carrasquilla, O. M., Pascual, E. S., y Roque, I. M. S. (2022). La brecha de género en la Educación STEM. Revista de Educacion, 2022(396), 149–172. https://doi.org/10.4438/1988-592X-RE-2022-396-533

Chi, S., Wang, Z., Liu, X., y Zhu, L. (2017). Associations among attitudes, perceived difficulty of learning science, gender, parents’ occupation and students’ scientific competencies. International Journal of Science Education, 39(16), 2171–2188. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2017.1366675

Dapía, M., Escudero-Cid, R., y Vidal, M. (2019). ¿Tiene género la ciencia? Conocimientos y actitudes hacia la Ciencia en niñas y niños de Educación Primaria. Revista Eureka Sobre Enseñanza y Divulgación de Las Ciencias, 16(3), 3201. https://doi.org/10.25267/Rev_Eureka_ensen_divulg_cienc.2019.v16.i3.3302

Dweck, C. S. (2006). Mindset: The new psychology of success. Random House.

Eccles, J. S., y Wigfield, A. (2023). Expectancy-value theory to situated expectancy-value theory: Reflections on the legacy of 40+ years of working together. Motivation Science, 9(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1037/mot0000275

Ellis, J., Fosdich, B. K., y Rasmussen, C. (2016). Women 1.5 times more likely to leave STEM pipeline after calculus compared to men: Lack of mathematical confidence a potential culprit. PLoS ONE, 11(7), e0157447. https://doi.org/journal.pone.0157447

Ferrando, P. J., Lorenzo-Seva, U., Hernández-Dorado, A., y Muñiz, J. (2022). Decálogo para el análisis factorial de los ítems de un test [Decalogue for the factor analysis of test items]. Psicothema, 34(1), 7–17. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2021.456

Flake, J. K., Barron, K. E., Hulleman, C., McCoach, B. D., y Welsh, M. E. (2015). Measuring cost: The forgotten component of expectancy-value theory. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 41, 232–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2015.03.002

Hayes, A. F., y Coutts, J. J. (2020). Use Omega rather than Cronbach’s Alpha for estimating reliability. But…. Communication Methods and Measures, 14(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2020.1718629

Iacobucci, D., Posavac, S. S., Kardes, F. R., Schneider, M. J., y Popovich, D. L. (2015). The median split: Robust, refined, and revived. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 25(4), 690–704. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2015.06.014

Jiang, Y., y Rosenzweig, E. Q. (2021). Using cost to improve predictions of adolescent students’ future choice intentions, avoidance intentions, and course grades in mathematics and English. Learning and Individual Differences, 86(February), 101978. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2021.101978

Miller, B. (2021). Developing interest in STEM careers: The need to incorporate STEM in early education. School Science and Mathematics, 10–11. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12497

Mrazek, A. J., Ihm, E. D., Molden, D. C., Mrazek, M. D., Zedelius, C. M., y Schooler, J. W. (2018). Expanding minds: Growth mindsets of self-regulation and the influences on effort and perseverance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 79(June), 164–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2018.07.003

Muenks, K., Miller, J. E., Schuetze, B. A., y Whittaker, T. A. (2023). Is cost separate from or part of subjective task value? An empirical examination of expectancy-value versus expectancy-value-cost perspectives. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 72, 102149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2023.102149

Newell, A. D., Zientek, L. R., Tharp, B. Z., Vogt, G. L., y Moreno, N. P. (2015). Students’ attitudes toward science as predictors of gains on student content knowledge: Benefits of an after-school program. School Science and Mathematics, 115(5), 216–225. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12125

Ogundimu, E. O., Altman, D. G., y Collins, G. S. (2016). Adequate sample size for developing prediction models is not simply related to events per variable. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 76, 175–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.02.031

Ong, A. K. S., Prasetyo, Y. T., Pinugu, J. N. J., Chuenyindee, T., Chin, J., y Nadlifatin, R. (2022). Determining factors influencing students’ future intentions to enroll in chemistry-related courses: integrating self-determination theory and theory of planned behavior. International Journal of Science Education, 44(4), 556–578. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2022.2036857

Ong, A. K. S., Prasetyo, Y. T., Pinugu, J. N. J., Chuenyindee, T., Chin, J., y Nadlifatin, R. (2022). Determining factors influencing students’ future intentions to enroll in chemistry-related courses: integrating self-determination theory and theory of planned behavior. International Journal of Science Education, 44(4), 556–578. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2022.2036857

Robles, A., Solbes, J., Cantó, J. R., y Lozano, Ó. R. (2015). Actitudes de los estudiantes hacia la ciencia escolar en el primer ciclo de la Enseñanza Secundaria Obligatoria. Revista Electrónica de Enseñanza de Las Ciencias, 14(3), 361–376.

Ryan, R. M., y Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1037110003-066X.55.1.68

Sweller, J. (2020). Cognitive load theory and educational technology. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-019-09701-3

Toma, R. B. (2020). Revisión sistemática de instrumentos de actitudes hacia la ciencia (2004-2016) [Systematic review of attitude toward science instruments (2004-2016)]. Enseñanza de Las Ciencias, 38(3), 143–159. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/ensciencias.2854

Toma, R. B. (2022a). Elementary school students’ interests and attitudes towards biology and physics. Journal of Biological Education, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2022.2147208

Toma, R. B. (2022b). Perceived difficulty of school science and cost appraisals: A valuable relationship for the STEM pipeline? Research in Science Education, 52, 553–565. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-020- 09963-5

Toma, R. B., y Lederman, N. G. (2022). A comprehensive review of instruments measuring attitudes toward science. Research in Science Education, 52, 567–582. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-020-09967-1

Toma, R. B., y Meneses-Villagrá, J. A. (2019). Validation of the single-items Spanish-school science attitude survey (S-SSAS) for elementary education. PLoS ONE, 14(1), e0209027. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0209027

Tytler, R., y Ferguson, J. P. (2023). Student attitudes, identity, and aspirations toward science. En N. G. Lederman, D. L. Zeidler, y J. S. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Science Education, Volume III (pp. 158–192). Routledge.

Wang, M. T., y Degol, J. (2013). Motivational pathways to STEM career choices: Using expectancy-value perspective to understand individual and gender differences in STEM fields. Developmental Review, 33(4), 304–340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2013.08.001

Yánez-Pérez, I., Toma, R. B., y Meneses-Villagrá, J. Á. (2024a). Design and usability evaluation of a mobile app for elementary school inquiry-based science learning. School Science and Mathematics, June, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.18303

Yánez-Pérez, I., Toma, R. B., y Meneses-Villagrá, J. A. (2024b). La brecha digital en la enseñanza de las ciencias en España durante las leyes educativas LOE y LOMCE. Revista Tecnología, Ciencia y Educación.

Información de contacto / Contact info: Radu Bogdan Toma. Universidad de Burgos, Facultad de Educación, Departamento de Didácticas Específicas. E-mail: rbtoma@ubu.es